Leonard J Paulozzi1, Chao Zhou1, Christopher M Jones2, Likang Xu1, Curtis S Florence1. 1. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA. 2. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: When providers recognize that patients are abusing prescription drugs, review of the drugs they are prescribed and attempts to treat the substance use disorder are warranted. However, little is known about whether prescribing patterns change following such a diagnosis. METHODS: We used national longitudinal health claims data from the Market Scan® commercial claims database for January 2010-June 2011. We used a cohort of 1.85 million adults 18-64 years old prescribed opioid analgesics but without abuse diagnoses during a 6-month "preabuse" period. We identified a subset of 9009 patients receiving diagnoses of abuse of non-illicit drugs (abuse group) during a 6-month "abuse" period and compared them with patients without such a diagnosis (nonabuse group) during both the abuse period and a subsequent 6-month "postabuse" period. RESULTS: During the abuse period 5.78% of the abuse group and 0.14% of the nonabuse group overdosed. Overdose rates declined to 2.12% in the abuse group in the postabuse period. Opioid prescribing rates declined 13.5%, and benzodiazepine rates declined 12.3% in the abuse group in the post-abuse period. Antidepressants and gabapentin were prescribed to roughly one half and one quarter of the abuse group, respectively, during all three periods. Daily opioid dosage did not decline in the abuse group following diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing to people who abuse drugs changes little after their abuse is documented. Actions such as tapering opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions, maximizing alternative treatments for pain, and greater use of medication-assisted treatment such as buprenorphine could help reduce risk in this population. Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
PURPOSE: When providers recognize that patients are abusing prescription drugs, review of the drugs they are prescribed and attempts to treat the substance use disorder are warranted. However, little is known about whether prescribing patterns change following such a diagnosis. METHODS: We used national longitudinal health claims data from the Market Scan® commercial claims database for January 2010-June 2011. We used a cohort of 1.85 million adults 18-64 years old prescribed opioid analgesics but without abuse diagnoses during a 6-month "preabuse" period. We identified a subset of 9009 patients receiving diagnoses of abuse of non-illicit drugs (abuse group) during a 6-month "abuse" period and compared them with patients without such a diagnosis (nonabuse group) during both the abuse period and a subsequent 6-month "postabuse" period. RESULTS: During the abuse period 5.78% of the abuse group and 0.14% of the nonabuse group overdosed. Overdose rates declined to 2.12% in the abuse group in the postabuse period. Opioid prescribing rates declined 13.5%, and benzodiazepine rates declined 12.3% in the abuse group in the post-abuse period. Antidepressants and gabapentin were prescribed to roughly one half and one quarter of the abuse group, respectively, during all three periods. Daily opioid dosage did not decline in the abuse group following diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing to people who abuse drugs changes little after their abuse is documented. Actions such as tapering opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions, maximizing alternative treatments for pain, and greater use of medication-assisted treatment such as buprenorphine could help reduce risk in this population. Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: Sara E Heins; Mark J Sorbero; Christopher M Jones; Andrew W Dick; Bradley D Stein Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Tej D Azad; Yi Zhang; Martin N Stienen; Daniel Vail; Jason P Bentley; Allen L Ho; Paras Fatemi; Daniel Herrick; Lily H Kim; Austin Feng; Kunal Varshneya; Michael Jin; Anand Veeravagu; Jayanta Bhattacharya; Manisha Desai; Anna Lembke; John K Ratliff Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ingrid A Binswanger; Deborah Rinehart; Shane R Mueller; Komal J Narwaney; Melanie Stowell; Nicole Wagner; Stan Xu; Rebecca Hanratty; Josh Blum; Kevin McVaney; Jason M Glanz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Gregory Eigner; Brian Henriksen; Philip Huynh; David Murphy; Christopher Brubaker; Jana Sanders; Deborah McMahan Journal: Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol Date: 2017-09-08