Literature DB >> 26861007

Intraabdominal Pressure and Postoperative Discomfort in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) Surgery: a Randomized Study.

Y Caesar1, I Sidlovskaja1, A Lindqvist2, H Gislason1, J L Hedenbro3,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High intraabdominal pressure (IAP) during laparoscopic surgery has been associated with postoperative discomfort. Effects on nausea and access have not been subjected to randomized studies. In cholecystectomy, lower IAP may cause less pain, but nausea and surgical access in RYGB surgery have not been investigated. We studied the influence of two IAP levels on surgical access, operation time, postoperative pain, and nausea.
METHODS: Fifty consecutive female gastric bypass patients were randomized to intraabdominal pressure of 12 (IAP12) or 18 (IAP18) mm Hg. Surgeons and personnel were blinded to randomization; study groups were well matched for age and BMI. Operative time was noted in minutes. Visual analogue scales were used for assessing access and for patients assessing pain (abdomen-shoulder) and nausea (supine-standing) at six time points during the first 16 postoperative hours. Rescue medication was recorded.
RESULTS: In 3/25 patients in the IAP12 group, the code was broken due to access problems vs. 0/25 in the IAP18 group (p = 0.1398). Operative time did not differ. Access was significantly better for IAP18 (92.2 ± 2.3 vs. 69.3 ± 4.2; p = 0.0001). Postoperative shoulder pain was maximal after 6 h but throughout less than in the abdomen (p < 0.0001); there were no differences in pain between IAP18 and IAP12 (p = 0.7408). Postoperative nausea was significantly greater standing than supine but without differences between groups.
CONCLUSION: Higher IAP gives better surgical access in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with no negative effect on pain or nausea.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal pressure; Anesthesia; ERAS; Gastric bypass; Laparoscopy; Nausea; Pain

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26861007     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-016-2091-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  14 in total

1.  Cardiac function during laparoscopic vs open gastric bypass.

Authors:  N T Nguyen; H S Ho; N W Fleming; P Moore; S J Lee; C D Goldman; C J Cole; B M Wolfe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Fast-track surgery for bariatric laparoscopic gastric bypass with focus on anaesthesia and peri-operative care. Experience with 500 cases.

Authors:  A Bergland; H Gislason; J Raeder
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.105

3.  Influence of median surgeon operative duration on adverse outcomes in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Bradley N Reames; Daniel Bacal; Robert W Krell; John D Birkmeyer; Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Jonathan F Finks
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.734

4.  A prospective randomized trial on comparison of low-pressure (LP) and standard-pressure (SP) pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M Barczyński; R M Herman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Effects of Posture and Meal Volume on Gastric Emptying, Intestinal Transit, Oral Glucose Tolerance, Blood Pressure and Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Nam Q Nguyen; Tamara L Debreceni; Carly M Burgstad; Judith M Wishart; Max Bellon; Chris K Rayner; Gary A Wittert; Michael Horowitz
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Randomized, prospective comparison of postoperative pain in low- versus high-pressure pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  Mahmut Koc; Tamer Ertan; Mesut Tez; M Ali Kocpinar; Mehmet Kilic; Erdal Gocmen; A Kessaf Aslar
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.872

7.  Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum versus standard pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Trichak Sandhu; Sirikan Yamada; Veeravorn Ariyakachon; Thiraphat Chakrabandhu; Wilaiwan Chongruksut; Wasana Ko-iam
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Preoperative Nutrition and Postoperative Discomfort in an ERAS Setting: A Randomized Study in Gastric Bypass Surgery.

Authors:  A Karlsson; K Wendel; S Polits; H Gislason; J L Hedenbro
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Effects of pneumoperitoneum on intraoperative pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange during laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  N T Nguyen; J T Anderson; M Budd; N W Fleming; H S Ho; J Jahr; C M Stevens; B M Wolfe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Internal hernia after gastric bypass: a new and simplified technique for laparoscopic primary closure of the mesenteric defects.

Authors:  Ebrahim Aghajani; Hedin J Jacobsen; Bent Johnny Nergaard; Jan L Hedenbro; Björn Geir Leifson; Hjörtur Gislason
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  4 in total

1.  Lower intra-abdominal pressure has no cardiopulmonary benefits during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Youn Joung Cho; Hyesun Paik; Seung-Yong Jeong; Ji Won Park; Woo Young Jo; Yunseok Jeon; Kook Hyun Lee; Jeong-Hwa Seo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Corticosteroids or Not for Postoperative Nausea: A Double-Blinded Randomized Study.

Authors:  L Nordin; A Nordlund; A Lindqvist; H Gislason; J L Hedenbro
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet System (SSTS) for the management of postoperative pain after major abdominal and gynecological surgery within an ERAS protocol: an observational study.

Authors:  Stefano Turi; Francesco Deni; Gaetano Lombardi; Marilena Marmiere; Francesco Giuseppe Nisi; Luigi Beretta
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Comparison of Intraperitoneal Normal Saline Infusion with Pulmonary Recruitment Maneuver in Reducing Shoulder and Upper Abdomen Pain Following Gynecologic Laparoscopic Procedures: A Randomized, Controlled, Triple-Blind Trial.

Authors:  Fatemeh Davari-Tanha; Saghar Samimi; Zahra Khalaj; Ehsan Bastanhagh
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2019-06-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.