Literature DB >> 26860711

Natural fast speech is perceived as faster than linearly time-compressed speech.

Eva Reinisch1.   

Abstract

Listeners compensate for variation in speaking rate: In a fast context, a given sound is interpreted as longer than in a slow context. Experimental rate manipulations have been achieved either through linear compression or by using natural fast speech. However, in natural fast speech, segments are subject to processes such as reduction or deletion. If speaking rate is then defined as the number of segments per unit time, the question arises as to what impact such processes have on listeners' normalization for speaking rate. The present study tested the effect of sentence duration and fast-speech processes on rate normalization for a German vowel duration contrast. Results showed that a naturally produced short sentence containing segmental reductions and deletions led to the most "long" vowel responses whereas the long sentence with clearly articulated segments led to the fewest. This suggests that speaking rate is not merely calculated as the number of segments realized per unit time. Rather, listeners associate properties of natural fast speech with a higher speaking rate. This contrasts with earlier results and a second experiment in which perceived speaking rate was measured in an explicit task. Models of speech comprehension are evaluated with regard to the present findings.

Keywords:  Speaking rate; Speech perception; Spoken word recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26860711     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1067-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  4 in total

1.  Accounting for rate-dependent category boundary shifts in speech perception.

Authors:  Hans Rutger Bosker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Foreign Languages Sound Fast: Evidence from Implicit Rate Normalization.

Authors:  Hans Rutger Bosker; Eva Reinisch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-28

3.  Encoding speech rate in challenging listening conditions: White noise and reverberation.

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; Hans Rutger Bosker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  Temporal contrast effects in human speech perception are immune to selective attention.

Authors:  Hans Rutger Bosker; Matthias J Sjerps; Eva Reinisch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.