Literature DB >> 26860676

Cumulative radiation exposure and associated cancer risk estimates for scoliosis patients: Impact of repetitive full spine radiography.

Martin Law1, Wang-Kei Ma2, Damian Lau2, Eva Chan2, Lawrance Yip2, Wendy Lam2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively evaluate the cumulative effective dose and associated cancer risk for scoliotic patients undergoing repetitive full spine radiography during their diagnosis and follow up periods.
METHODS: Organ absorbed doses of full spine exposed scoliotic patients at different age were computer simulated with the use of PCXMC software. Gender specific effective dose was then calculated with the ICRP-103 approach. Values of lifetime attributable cancer risk for patients exposed at different age were calculated for both patient genders and for Asian and Western population. Mathematical fitting for effective dose and for lifetime attributable cancer risk, as function of exposed age, was analytically obtained to quantitatively estimate patient cumulated effective dose and cancer risk.
RESULTS: The cumulative effective dose of full spine radiography with posteroanterior and lateral projection for patients exposed annually at age between 5 and 30 years using digital radiography system was calculated as 15mSv. The corresponding cumulative lifetime attributable cancer risk for Asian and Western population was calculated as 0.08-0.17%. Female scoliotic patients would be at a statistically significant higher cumulated cancer risk than male patients under the same full spine radiography protocol.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the use of computer simulation and analytic formula to quantitatively obtain the cumulated effective dose and cancer risk at any age of exposure, both of which are valuable information to medical personnel and patients' parents concern about radiation safety in repetitive full spine radiography.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cumulative cancer risk; Cumulative effective dose; Full spine scoliosis radiography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26860676     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.12.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  15 in total

1.  What is the variability in shoulder, axillae and waist position in a group of adolescents?

Authors:  Adrian Gardner; Fiona Berryman; Paul Pynsent
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality in low radiation dose chest CT: a phantom study.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Ting-Ting Zhang; Zhi-Hai Hu; Juan Li; Hong-Jun Hou; Zu-Shan Xu; Wen He
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  Cobb angle measurement with a conventional convex echography probe and a smartphone.

Authors:  Joan Ferràs-Tarragó; J M Morales Valencia; P Rubio Belmar; S Pérez Vergara; P Jordà Gómez; J L Bas Hermida; P Bas Hermida; T Bas Hermida
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lowered dose full-spine radiography in pediatric patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Caroline Ernst; Nico Buls; Armand Laumen; Gert Van Gompel; Filip Verhelle; Johan de Mey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Validity of sagittal thoracolumbar curvature measurement using a non-radiographic surface topography method.

Authors:  Erin Hannink; Helen Dawes; Thomas M L Shannon; Karen L Barker
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-07-09

6.  Accuracy assessment of pedicle screw insertion with patient specific 3D‑printed guides through superimpose CT-analysis in thoracolumbar spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  J Cool; J van Schuppen; M A de Boer; B J van Royen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Dose, image quality and spine modeling assessment of biplanar EOS micro-dose radiographs for the follow-up of in-brace adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Authors:  Baptiste Morel; Sonia Moueddeb; Eleonore Blondiaux; Stephen Richard; Manon Bachy; Raphael Vialle; Hubert Ducou Le Pointe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Does the law of diminishing returns apply to the lengthening of the MCGR rod in early onset scoliosis with reference to growth velocity?

Authors:  Adrian Gardner; Alistair Beaven; David Marks; Jonathan Spilsbury; Jwalant Mehta; Matthew Newton Ede
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

9.  The effects of scoliosis and subsequent surgery on the shape of the torso.

Authors:  Adrian Gardner; Fiona Berryman; Paul Pynsent
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2017-11-20

10.  Spinal phantom comparability study of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis using digital radiographic imaging.

Authors:  Ni Chung; Yi-Hong Cheng; Hiu-Lam Po; Wai-Kit Ng; Kam-Ching Cheung; Ho-Yin Yung; Yau-Ming Lai
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.