| Literature DB >> 26859850 |
Nick Van Laeken1, Olivia Taylor2, Ingeborgh Polis3, Sara Neyt1, Ken Kersemans4, Andre Dobbeleir4, Jimmy Saunders2, Ingeborg Goethals4, Kathelijne Peremans2, Filip De Vos1.
Abstract
This first-in-dog study evaluates the use of the PET-radioligand [11C]DASB to image the density and availability of the serotonin transporter (SERT) in the canine brain. Imaging the serotonergic system could improve diagnosis and therapy of multiple canine behavioural disorders. Furthermore, as many similarities are reported between several human neuropsychiatric conditions and naturally occurring canine behavioural disorders, making this tracer available for use in dogs also provide researchers an interesting non-primate animal model to investigate human disorders. Five adult beagles underwent a 90 minutes dynamic PET scan and arterial whole blood was sampled throughout the scan. For each ROI, the distribution volume (VT), obtained via the one- and two- tissue compartment model (1-TC, 2-TC) and the Logan Plot, was calculated and the goodness-of-fit was evaluated by the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). For the preferred compartmental model BPND values were estimated and compared with those derived by four reference tissue models: 4-parameter RTM, SRTM2, MRTM2 and the Logan reference tissue model. The 2-TC model indicated in 61% of the ROIs a better fit compared to the 1-TC model. The Logan plot produced almost identical VT values and can be used as an alternative. Compared with the 2-TC model, all investigated reference tissue models showed high correlations but small underestimations of the BPND-parameter. The highest correlation was achieved with the Logan reference tissue model (Y = 0.9266 x + 0.0257; R2 = 0.9722). Therefore, this model can be put forward as a non-invasive standard model for future PET-experiments with [11C]DASB in dogs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26859850 PMCID: PMC4747581 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148943
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1(A) Time course for the percentage of radioactivity in plasma (mean ± SD) corresponding to unchanged [.
Fig 2Distribution of [11C]DASB in the canine brain: dorsal and sagital sections of a summed PET-image, fused with MRI.
Regions of interest delineated on the image: 1. Frontal cortex right – 2. Frontal cortex left – 3. Temporal cortex right – 4. Temporal cortex left – 5. Occipital cortex right – 6. Occipital cortex left – 7. Basal ganglia right – 8. Basal ganglia left – 9. Thalamus right – 10. Thalamus left – 11. Hippocampus right – 12. Hippocampus left – 13. Region in brainstem containing raphe nuclei – 14. Cerebellar cortex, vermis excluded – 15. Anterior cingulate gyrus – 16. Posterior cingulate gyrus.
Fig 3Regional time-activity curves measured after injection of 29 MBq/kg [11C]DASB in a six year old female beagle.
Distribution Volumes (Mean ± SD) and AIC values (Mean) for Single- and Two-Tissue Compartmental Models and the Logan Plot.
| 1-TC | AIC | 2-TC | AIC | Logan | Logan (t* = 24,83 min) | Ratio 1-TC/2-TC | Ratio Logan/2-TC | Ratio Logan (t* = 24,83 min)/2-TC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.41±0.31 | 49 | 3.63±0.46 | -22 | 3.53±0.41 | 3.54±0.41 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.97 | |
| 2.37±0.40 | 52 | 2.48±0.48 | 10 | 2.44±0.46 | 2.44±0.47 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.98 | |
| 2.28±0.18 | 42 | 2.38±0.21 | 2 | 2.37±0.20 | 2.37±0.22 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 3.42±0.65 | 53 | 3.63±0.76 | 10 | 3.49±0.67 | 3.49±0.69 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.96 | |
| 3.34±0.33 | 48 | 3.53±0.42 | 2 | 3.44±0.38 | 3.44±0.38 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.97 | |
| 2.81±0.82 | 41 | 2.94±0.95 | 6 | 2.87±0.85 | 2.88±0.87 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.98 | |
| 2.69±0.52 | 39 | 2.82±0.61 | -2 | 2.76±0.54 | 2.76±0.55 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.98 | |
| 1.78±0.22 | 56 | 1.83±0.26 | 34 | 1.80±0.28 | 1.80±0.29 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.98 | |
| 1.58±0.11 | 54 | 1.62±0.14 | 38 | 1.61±0.19 | 1.60±0.20 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.99 | |
| 1.87±0.17 | 43 | 1.93±0.24 | 14 | 1.93±0.26 | 1.93±0.27 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 1.88±0.17 | 36 | 1.94±0.23 | 5 | 1.95±0.24 | 1.95±0.25 | 0.97 | 1.01 | 1.00 | |
| 1.64±0.15 | 48 | 1.68±0.17 | 32 | 1.67±0.19 | 1.67±0.20 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 | |
| 1.62±0.05 | 45 | 1.65±0.07 | 28 | 1.64±0.09 | 1.64±0.10 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.99 | |
| 1.36±0.12 | 49 | 1.41±0.16 | 37 | 1.37±0.18 | 1.37±0.18 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | |
| 1.36±0.11 | 53 | 1.39±0.10 | 39 | 1.37±0.16 | 1.36±0.17 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | |
| 1.54±0.19 | 46 | 1.57±0.20 | 29 | 1.55±0.17 | 1.54±0.17 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | |
| 1.49±0.15 | 44 | 1.52±0.18 | 26 | 1.51±0.20 | 1.51±0.21 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 | |
| 1.27±0.10 | 37 | 1.29±0.07 | 27 | 1.31±0.10 | 1.31±0.10 | 0.98 | 1.02 | 1.01 | |
L = left, R = right, ACG = anterior cingulate gyrus, PCG = posterior cingulate gyrus
Fig 4Correlations between [11C]DASB binding potentials (BPND) calculated from PET data using different kinetic models.