Literature DB >> 26859797

A qualitative investigation of factors influencing participation in bowel screening in New South Wales.

Greer Dawson1, Melanie Crane2, Claudine Lyons3, Anna Burnham4, Tara Bowman4, Joanne Travaglia5.   

Abstract

Issue addressed Bowel cancer is Australia's second biggest cancer killer. Yet, despite the existence of a free national bowel-screening program, participation in this program remains low. The aim of the present study was to understand the current factors contributing to this trend to help inform future strategies to increase participation. Methods Eight focus groups (n=61 in total) were conducted with participants aged 45 years and over from metropolitan and regional New South Wales (NSW). Discussions canvassed awareness, knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding bowel cancer and screening, and explored how these factors influenced decisions to screen. Results The low public profile of bowel cancer compared with other cancers, together with poor knowledge of its prevalence and treatability, has contributed to a low perception of risk in the community. Minimal understanding of the often-asymptomatic presentation of bowel cancer and the role of screening in prevention has appeared to compromise the perceived value of screening. In addition, confusion regarding when, and how often, individuals should screen was apparent. Knowledge of bowel cancer and screening, and its role in motivating intention to screen, emerged as a dominant theme in the data. Conclusions The present study highlights specific knowledge gaps and confusion with regard to bowel cancer and screening. Addressing these gaps through the provision of clear, coordinated information may shift attitudes to screening and increase participation. So what? Given the Australian Government's recent commitment to expand the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program, insight into what is driving current perceptions, attitudes and subsequent participation in bowel cancer screening is crucial to the development and targeting of new approaches and initiatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26859797     DOI: 10.1071/HE15026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot J Austr        ISSN: 1036-1073


  3 in total

1.  General practitioners' perceptions of population based bowel screening and their influence on practice: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Greer Dawson; Melanie Crane; Claudine Lyons; Anna Burnham; Tara Bowman; Donna Perez; Joanne Travaglia
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.497

2.  Motives for non-adherence to colonoscopy advice after a positive colorectal cancer screening test result: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lucinda Bertels; Peter Lucassen; Kristel van Asselt; Evelien Dekker; Henk van Weert; Bart Knottnerus
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.581

3.  Barriers and facilitators to participation in breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening in rural Victoria: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Denise Azar; Michael Murphy; Alana Fishman; Lauren Sewell; Megan Barnes; Amanda Proposch
Journal:  Health Promot J Austr       Date:  2021-03-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.