This study aimed to examine whether daily intake of citrus juice containing heat-killed Lactobacillus plantarum YIT 0132 (LP0132-fermented juice) alleviates symptoms of atopic dermatitis. This was a natural extension of our previous study in which LP0132 was shown to enhance IL-10 production in vitro and LP0132-fermented juice was found to alleviate symptoms and enhance quality of life (QOL) in patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis. In two open trials, Trial 1 and Trial 2, 32 and 18 adult patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis consumed LP0132-fermented juice for 8 weeks. Skin conditions and QOL were subjectively evaluated using Skindex-16 before intake of the juice (Pre-treatment), 8 weeks after starting intake (Treatment) and 8 weeks after termination of intake (Post-treatment). Blood parameters were also analyzed. Comparison of the Treatment and Post-treatment time points with the Pre-treatment time point revealed significant reductions in the Skindex-16 overall score and the 3 domain subscores (symptoms, emotions, and functioning domains) in both trials. Moreover, blood levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), total immunoglobulin E (IgE) and specific IgEs for Japanese cedar and cypress pollen were significantly attenuated in Trial 2. The findings suggest that daily intake of citrus fermented juice containing heat-killed LP0132 has beneficial effects on symptoms and QOL in patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis due to an immunomodulatory effect via attenuation of IgE and ECP.
This study aimed to examine whether daily intake of citrus juice containing heat-killed Lactobacillus plantarum YIT 0132 (LP0132-fermented juice) alleviates symptoms of atopic dermatitis. This was a natural extension of our previous study in which LP0132 was shown to enhance IL-10 production in vitro and LP0132-fermented juice was found to alleviate symptoms and enhance quality of life (QOL) in patients with Japanese cedarpollinosis. In two open trials, Trial 1 and Trial 2, 32 and 18 adult patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis consumed LP0132-fermented juice for 8 weeks. Skin conditions and QOL were subjectively evaluated using Skindex-16 before intake of the juice (Pre-treatment), 8 weeks after starting intake (Treatment) and 8 weeks after termination of intake (Post-treatment). Blood parameters were also analyzed. Comparison of the Treatment and Post-treatment time points with the Pre-treatment time point revealed significant reductions in the Skindex-16 overall score and the 3 domain subscores (symptoms, emotions, and functioning domains) in both trials. Moreover, blood levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), total immunoglobulin E (IgE) and specific IgEs for Japanese cedar and cypress pollen were significantly attenuated in Trial 2. The findings suggest that daily intake of citrus fermented juice containing heat-killed LP0132 has beneficial effects on symptoms and QOL in patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis due to an immunomodulatory effect via attenuation of IgE and ECP.
Entities:
Keywords:
Lactobacillus plantarum; Skindex-16; atopic dermatitis; citrus juice; eosinophil cationic protein; immunoglobulin E; quality of life
The number of patients complaining of allergic symptoms such as atopic dermatitis and pollinosis is on the
increase [1]. Also, many patients experiencing allergy-specific symptoms
often experience additional symptoms of headache, malaise, insomnia, frustration, and anxiety. Although these
symptoms are not fatal, they significantly reduce quality of life (QOL), lowering working and learning
efficiency, and therefore they are becoming a major social problem [2,
3]. In general, anti-allergy drugs such as antihistamines, steroids and
immune suppressors are used to alleviate symptoms. However, such treatment is expensive, and long-term
administration of these drugs frequently results in side effects. Prevention or improved treatment of allergies
such as atopic dermatitis without drugs is therefore urgently required.Recently, use of functional foods with anti-allergic activity for the treatment or prevention of allergies has
attracted attention. For example, certain lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are known to show immunomodulatory effects
[4,5,6], with several clinical trials demonstrating an effect in alleviating symptoms of pollinosis
[7,8,9,10] and atopic dermatitis [11, 12]. Certain herbs and natural herbal products are
also known to have anti-allergic potential. For example, hesperidin, a flavanone glycoside found in citrus
fruits, has been found to have anti-inflammatory activity, inhibiting degranulation of mast cells, relieving
edema and preventing anaphylaxis [13,14,15].Previously, we reported on Lactobacillus plantarum YIT 0132 (LP0132), which shows high
potential to proliferate in citrus juice. In mouse intraperitoneal macrophage culture, LP0132 was found to
induce IL-10, which is an anti-inflammatory cytokine, and LP0132 and citrus juice were found to have an
additional effect on allergic symptoms in an animal model of Japanese cedarpollinosis (JCPsis). A single-blind,
placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial also revealed that daily intake of citrus juice fermented with LP0132
alleviates symptoms while enhancing QOL in patients with JCPsis [16].
However, it remains unknown whether citrus juice fermented with LP0132 also alleviates symptoms of atopic
dermatitis in adult patients. To examine this question, we conducted two open trials of daily intake of citrus
juice fermented with LP0132 in adult patients with atopic dermatitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Test beverage
Satsuma Mandarin (Citrus unshiu) juice (Nankaikako Co., Ltd., Wakayama, Japan) was fermented
with LP0132, obtained from the Culture Collection Research Laboratory of Yakult Central Institute, at 37°C for
48 hr and then sterilized by heating at 90°C for 5 min (LP0132-fermented juice). The composition of the
resulting beverage is shown in Table 1. The final product contained LP0132 cells at a concentration of approximately 6 ×
1010 cells/100 ml, as determined by the DAPI counting method [17]. The beverage was distributed and stored at 4°C.
Table 1.
Composition of the test beverage in Trials 1 and 2
Calories
kcal/100 ml
39.0
Protein
g/100 ml
0.4
Fat
g/100 ml
<0.1
Carbohydrates
g/100 ml
9.4
Sodium
g/100 ml
ND
Heat-killed LP0132
cells/100 ml
6.0 × 1010
ND: not detected
ND: not detectedData are shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). BMI: body mass index; DBP: diastolic blood
pressure; SBP: systolic blood pressure
Design
The study consisted of two single-arm, non-randomized, open trials, Trials 1 and 2, conducted from October to
February in 2012 and 2013, respectively. Subjects were asked to consume a bottle (100 ml) of test beverage
once a day after breakfast from 13 October to 15 December 2012 in Trial 1, and from 21 October to 15 December
2013 in Trial 2 (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Study protocol.
A total of 33 subjects who consented to participation in Trial 1 consumed the test beverage for 8 weeks
and then underwent an 8-week Post-treatment period from Oct 2012 to Feb 2013. Of the Trial 1 subjects,
19 participated in Trial 2 (Oct 2013 to Feb 2014) after giving further consent. The protocol of Trial 2
was the same as that of Trial 1, except for photographs, which were taken in Trial 1 only, and blood
samples, which were taken in Trial 2 only.
Study protocol.A total of 33 subjects who consented to participation in Trial 1 consumed the test beverage for 8 weeks
and then underwent an 8-week Post-treatment period from Oct 2012 to Feb 2013. Of the Trial 1 subjects,
19 participated in Trial 2 (Oct 2013 to Feb 2014) after giving further consent. The protocol of Trial 2
was the same as that of Trial 1, except for photographs, which were taken in Trial 1 only, and blood
samples, which were taken in Trial 2 only.
Subjects
Male and female subjects aged 18 to 77 years with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis according to the 2008
guidelines for the treatment of atopic dermatitis [18] were recruited.
In Trial 1, a total of 33 subjects (12 men, 21 women) were enrolled, with none meeting any of the exclusion
criteria: severe atopic dermatitis, other dermatitis, food allergy, drug allergy, pregnant or lactating,
planning to become pregnant, or severe diseases such as cancer, diabetes, disorders of the liver, kidneys,
heart, respiratory system, endocrine system, metabolic disorders, or mental illness. In Trial 2, 19 subjects
(6 men, 13 women) were enrolled from the 33 who participated in Trial 1, and the exclusion criteria were again
checked. In both trials, no dietary restrictions, medications, or hospital visits were required during the
test period, and any notes of interest were recorded in a diary. Subjects were asked to self-record intake of
the test beverage, diet, medicine usage, lifestyle habits and any adverse events that occurred. Subjects were
recommended to follow an invariant lifestyle during the trial. Each trial was conducted in accordance with the
Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Human Trials
Committee of Kagawa Nutrition University, Tokyo, Japan. Written informed consent was obtained from all
subjects prior to enrollment in each trial.
Evaluation of symptoms and QOL
Subjects were required to answer a questionnaire, the Skindex-16 (Table
3) [19,20,21], which was comprised of 16 items and scored on a 7-point scale ranging
from 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered), to evaluate symptoms of atopic dermatitis and reduced QOL
prior to intake of the test beverage (Pre-treatment), 8 weeks after starting intake (Treatment), and 8 weeks
after termination of intake (Post-treatment). In both trials, the overall score for all question items and the
3 domain subscores, that is the symptoms domain (items No. 1 to No. 4), the emotions domain (No. 5 to No. 11)
and the functioning domain (No. 12 to No. 16), were analyzed to compare the Treatment and Post-treatment time
points with the Pre-treatment time point.
Table 3.
Skindex-16 item
No.
During the past week, how often have you been bothered by:
1
Your skin condition itching
2
Your skin condition burning or stinging
3
Your skin condition hurting
4
Your skin condition being irritated
5
The persistence/reoccurrence of your skin condition
6
Worry about your skin (for example, that it will spread, get worse,
scar, be unpredictable, etc.)
7
The appearance of your skin condition
8
Frustration about your skin condition
9
Embarrassment about your skin condition
10
Being annoyed about your skin condition
11
Feeling depressed about your skin condition
12
The effects of your skin condition on your interactions with others (for
example, interactions with family, friends, close relationships, etc.)
13
The effects of your skin condition on your desire to be with people
14
Your skin condition making it hard to show affection
15
The effects of your skin condition on your daily activities
16
Your skin condition making it hard to work or do what you enjoy
Each question asks the patient the degree to which they have been bothered about their skin condition,
and each is graded on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered).
Each question asks the patient the degree to which they have been bothered about their skin condition,
and each is graded on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered).
Photographs
In Trial 1, photographs of the sites of symptoms were taken in all subjects at the Pre-treatment, Treatment
and Post-treatment time points.
Serum parameters
In Trial 2, consent was obtained from 13 subjects for collection of blood samples at the Pre-treatment,
Treatment and Post-treatment time points. Serum levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE) (total, specific for Japanese
cedar pollen and specific for Japanese cypress pollen) and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) were determined
by fluorescent enzyme immunoassay. The percentages of Th1 cells (IFN-γ+/IL-4–)/helper T cells (CD4+ T cells),
Th2 cells (IFN-γ–/IL-4+)/helper T cells (CD4+ T cells), Th1/Th2 and Treg cells (CD4+CD25+Foxp3+)/helper T
cells (CD4+ T cells) were determined by flow cytometry using an automated hematology analyzer (Sysmex XE-2100,
Sysmex Co., Ltd., Hyogo, Japan). General biochemical parameters in serum and hematologic parameters were also
examined.
Statistics
Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation. All data were analyzed using the SAS preclinical package
ver. 5.0 (SAS Institute Japan, Tokyo, Japan). Questionnaire data were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test
between the Pre-treatment time point and each analysis point. Blood data were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-rank
test between Pre-treatment and each analysis point. Multiple comparison was followed by Bonferroni correction.
Two-sided p-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Trial 1
Inclusion of subjects
Figure 1 shows the inclusion of subjects. A total of 33 subjects
consumed the test beverage for 8 weeks. One subject was unable to answer the questionnaire after treatment
for personal reasons. The compliance rate was about 98%, and no subjects recorded any adverse events or
major changes in diet or lifestyle habits during the trial. As a result, 32 subjects (12 men, 20 women) were
included in the final analysis after exclusion of the abovementioned subject. Background data of the
subjects are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Background data of the subjects in Trials 1 and 2
Trial 1
Trial 2
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
n
12
20
32
6
12
18
Age
47.4 ± 19.0
42.4 ± 11.1
44.5 ± 14.3
50.3 ± 21.3
42.2 ± 12.0
43.1 ± 14.0
Height (cm)
166.1 ± 4.3
159.0 ± 4.7
161.7 ± 5.7
165.2 ± 4.3
161.0 ± 5.3
162.2 ± 5.5
Weight (kg)
67.0 ± 14.9
54.5 ± 13.4
59.2 ± 15.0
66.8 ± 16.2
51.1 ± 9.2
56.0 ± 14.0
BMI
24.2 ± 4.7
21.5 ± 4.9
22.5 ± 4.9
24.3 ± 4.8
21.5 ± 4.9
19.7 ± 2.4
Body fat (%)
22.5 ± 6.1
29.1 ± 8.1
25.0 ± 8.1
22.1 ± 5.3
29.1 ± 8.1
24.8 ± 5.7
DBP (mmHg)
77.6 ± 15.7
70.3 ± 4.8
73.0 ± 14.3
84.1 ± 8.2
70.3 ± 4.8
64.2 ± 11.5
SBP (mmHg)
123.8 ± 20.9
114.2 ± 17.9
117.8 ± 19.4
127.3 ± 18.0
114.2 ± 17.9
104.7 ± 13.7
Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). BMI: body mass index; DBP: diastolic blood
pressure; SBP: systolic blood pressure
Evaluation of symptoms and QOL
Figure 2-(a) shows the changes in overall score (average score of all items) in Trial 1. Compared with the
Pre-treatment time point, the overall score was significantly reduced at the Treatment and Post-treatment
time points (each p<0.0005). Figure 3-(a) shows the changes in the average domain subscores. Compared with the Pre-treatment time point, the
symptoms domain (p<0.005), emotions domain (p<0.0005) and functioning domain (p<0.005)) were
significantly lower at the Treatment time point. Also, compared with the Pre-treatment time point, the
symptoms domain (p<0.025), emotions domain (p<0.0005) and functioning domain (p<0.005) were
significantly lower at the Post-Treatment time point.
Fig. 2.
Changes of overall score of Skindex-16 during Trials 1 and 2.
The effect of test beverage intake was evaluated by comparing scores at the Treatment and
Post-treatment time points with those at the Pre-treatment time point, respectively. (A) Trial 1, (B)
Trial 2. Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical difference were determined
by Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction (vs. Pre-treatment). *p<0.05/2;
**p<0.01/2; ***p<0.001/2.
Fig. 3.
Changes of three domain subscores of Skindex-16 during Trials 1 and 2.
The effect of test beverage intake was evaluated by comparing scores at the Treatment and
Post-treatment time points with those at the Pre-treatment time point, respectively. (A) Trial 1, (B)
Trial 2. Data are shown as the mean ± SD. Statistical difference were determined by Wilcoxon
signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction (vs. Pre-treatment), *p<0.05/2; **p<0.01/2;
***p<0.001/2.
Changes of overall score of Skindex-16 during Trials 1 and 2.The effect of test beverage intake was evaluated by comparing scores at the Treatment and
Post-treatment time points with those at the Pre-treatment time point, respectively. (A) Trial 1, (B)
Trial 2. Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical difference were determined
by Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction (vs. Pre-treatment). *p<0.05/2;
**p<0.01/2; ***p<0.001/2.Changes of three domain subscores of Skindex-16 during Trials 1 and 2.The effect of test beverage intake was evaluated by comparing scores at the Treatment and
Post-treatment time points with those at the Pre-treatment time point, respectively. (A) Trial 1, (B)
Trial 2. Data are shown as the mean ± SD. Statistical difference were determined by Wilcoxon
signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction (vs. Pre-treatment), *p<0.05/2; **p<0.01/2;
***p<0.001/2.Table 4 shows the changes in score for each of the 16 items in Skindex-16. Compared with the
Pre-treatment time point, the scores for item No. 1, No. 5 to 11, No. 15 (each p<0.0005), No. 4, No. 16
(each p<0.005) and No. 12 (p<0.025) were significantly reduced at the Treatment time point. Also, the
scores for item No. 7 to No. 11 (each p<0.0005), No. 1, No. 6, No. 15 (each p<0.005) and No. 5
(p<0.025) were significantly reduced at the Pre-treatment time point.
Table 4.
Skindex-16 scores in Trial 1
No.
Items
Pre-treatment
Treatment
Post-treatment
Avg SD
p-value
Avg SD
p-value
1
Itching
3.8
±
1.8
2.3
±
1.6
0.0004***
2.3
±
1.9
0.0032**
2
Burning or stinging
1.9
±
1.6
1.3
±
1.6
0.0624
1.2
±
1.6
0.0675
3
Hurting
1.3
±
1.4
0.6
±
0.9
0.0392
0.7
±
1.3
0.1027
4
Being irritated
2.0
±
1.6
1.2
±
1.5
0.0049**
1.3
±
1.6
0.0620
5
Persistence/reoccurrence
3.4
±
2.2
1.7
±
1.6
0.0004***
1.9
±
1.7
0.0100*
6
Worry
3.1
±
2.2
1.1
±
1.6
<0.0001***
1.4
±
1.5
0.0028**
7
Appearance
3.5
±
1.8
1.6
±
1.6
<0.0001***
1.5
±
1.6
<0.0001***
8
Frustration
2.7
±
1.9
0.9
±
1.4
<0.0001***
0.9
±
1.3
<0.0001***
9
Embarrassment
2.8
±
1.9
1.2
±
1.4
<0.0001***
0.9
±
1.5
<0.0001***
10
Being annoyed
3.6
±
2.1
1.7
±
1.9
<0.0001***
1.2
±
1.6
<0.0001***
11
Feeling depressed
2.5
±
2.1
0.9
±
1.4
0.0003***
0.7
±
1.1
0.0004***
12
Affecting interactions with others
0.9
±
1.2
0.3
±
0.7
0.0193*
0.4
±
0.8
0.0495
13
Desire to be with people
0.8
±
1.1
0.3
±
0.7
0.0540
0.4
±
0.8
0.1762
14
Show affection
0.6
±
1.0
0.3
±
0.7
0.1123
0.4
±
0.8
0.3150
15
Daily activities
1.8
±
1.7
0.6
±
1.0
0.0003***
0.6
±
1.0
0.0008**
16
Work or do what you enjoy
1.2
±
1.4
0.4
±
0.9
0.0022**
0.5
±
1.0
0.0415
Skindex-16 scores for 32 subjects. Data are shown as the shown as mean ± SD. The Pre-treatment time
point was compared with the Treatment and Post-treatment time points by Wilcoxon signed-rank test with
Bonferroni correction (vs. Pre-treatment). *p<0.05/2; **p<0.01/2; ***p<0.001/2
Skindex-16 scores for 32 subjects. Data are shown as the shown as mean ± SD. The Pre-treatment time
point was compared with the Treatment and Post-treatment time points by Wilcoxon signed-rank test with
Bonferroni correction (vs. Pre-treatment). *p<0.05/2; **p<0.01/2; ***p<0.001/2
Photographs
In most photographs taken at the Pre-treatment time point, symptoms of atopic dermatitis were observed. In
clear contrast, at the Treatment time point, symptoms were reduced in many subjects. Figure 4 shows representative photographs of this improvement for 3 subjects.
Fig. 4.
Representative photographs of skin lesions after treatment with LP0132-fermented juice during Trial
1.
(A) A 34-year-old man (subject No. 34) with erythema and exanthema. (B) A 74 year-old male (subject
No. 16) with scaling and desquamation. (C) A 51 year-old female (subject No. 05) with slight erythema
and exanthema. Almost all subjects showed significant improvement of skin lesions after treatment.
Representative photographs of skin lesions after treatment with LP0132-fermented juice during Trial
1.(A) A 34-year-old man (subject No. 34) with erythema and exanthema. (B) A 74 year-old male (subject
No. 16) with scaling and desquamation. (C) A 51 year-old female (subject No. 05) with slight erythema
and exanthema. Almost all subjects showed significant improvement of skin lesions after treatment.
Trial 2
Figure 1 shows the inclusion of subjects. The compliance rate for
intake of the test beverage was 100% during the intervention period, and no subject recorded any adverse
events or major changes in diet or lifestyle habits during the trial. One subject whose biochemical
measurements were abnormal was excluded at the discretion of the doctor. As a result, 18 subjects (6 men, 12
women) were included in the final analysis after exclusion of the abovementioned subject. Background data of
the analysis subjects are shown in Table 2.
Evaluation of symptoms and QOL in Skindex-16
Figure 2-(b) shows the changes in overall score (average score
for all items). Compared with the Pre-treatment point time, the scores at the Treatment and Post-treatment
time points were significantly reduced (each p<0.005). Figure
3-(b) shows the changes in average domain subscores. At the Treatment time point, the emotions
domain was significantly lower (p<0.005) compared with the Pre-treatment time point. Also, at the
Post-Treatment time point, the symptoms domain (p<0.025) and emotions domain (p<0.005) were
significantly lower compared with the Pre-treatment time point. Table
5 shows the changes in score for each of the 16 items in Skindex-16. Compared with the
Pre-treatment time point, the scores for item No. 7 (p<0.005), No. 5, No. 6, No. 11 and No. 12 (each
p<0.025) were significantly reduced at the Treatment time point. The scores for item No. 1, No. 7 (each
p<0.005), No. 5, No. 7, No. 9 and No. 13 (each p<0.025) were significantly reduced at the
Pre-treatment time point.
Table 5.
Skindex-16 scores in Trial 2
No.
Items
Pre-treatment
Treatment
Post-treatment
Avg SD
p-value
Avg SD
p-value
1
Itching
3.2
±
1.5
2.4
±
1.8
0.0322
2.5
±
1.6
0.0006**
2
Burning or stinging
2.4
±
1.8
1.7
±
1.6
0.1202
1.8
±
1.6
0.0571
3
Hurting
1.6
±
1.5
1.1
±
1.5
0.1682
1.1
±
1.2
0.0863
4
Being irritated
1.9
±
1.8
1.4
±
1.6
0.2129
1.3
±
1.3
0.0281
5
Persistence/reoccurrence
2.9
±
1.8
2.1
±
1.8
0.0235*
2.0
±
1.7
0.0123*
6
Worry
2.4
±
2.1
1.8
±
1.9
0.0197*
1.8
±
1.9
0.0334
7
Appearance
2.7
±
1.9
1.8
±
1.6
0.0031**
1.9
±
1.8
0.0116*
8
Frustration
1.7
±
1.8
1.2
±
1.6
0.0391
1.1
±
1.4
0.002**
9
Embarrassment
2.0
±
2.0
1.5
±
1.8
0.0938
1.3
±
1.6
0.0215*
10
Being annoyed
2.7
±
2.1
2.2
±
2.1
0.0654
2.0
±
1.9
0.0450
11
Feeling depressed
1.6
±
1.8
0.9
±
1.2
0.0234*
1.2
±
1.4
0.2148
12
Affecting interactions with others
0.7
±
1.2
0.3
±
0.8
0.0156*
0.4
±
0.8
0.0469
13
Desire to be with people
0.6
±
1.1
0.4
±
0.9
0.2031
0.4
±
0.8
0.0156*
14
Show affection
0.5
±
1.0
0.3
±
0.8
0.1875
0.3
±
0.8
0.2656
15
Daily activities
0.8
±
1.2
0.6
±
1.0
0.0938
0.4
±
1.0
0.1563
16
Work or do what you enjoy
0.6
±
1.2
0.4
±
1.0
0.5000
0.4
±
1.0
0.2500
Skindex-16 scores for 18 subjects. Data are shown as the mean ± SD. The Pre-treatment time point was
compared with the Treatment and Post-treatment time point by Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni
correction (vs. Pre-treatment). *p<0.05/2; **p<0.01/2; ***p<0.001/2
Skindex-16 scores for 18 subjects. Data are shown as the mean ± SD. The Pre-treatment time point was
compared with the Treatment and Post-treatment time point by Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni
correction (vs. Pre-treatment). *p<0.05/2; **p<0.01/2; ***p<0.001/2
Serum parameters
Table 6 shows the data for serum parameters as the mean ± standard deviation in 13 subjects who
consented to collection of blood samples. Compared with the Pre-treatment time point, the serum levels of
specific IgEs for Japanese cedar pollen and Japanese cypress pollen, detected in 9 subjects, were
significantly reduced at Treatment and Post-treatment (each p<0.005). In contrast, specific IgEs for mite
and house dust, considerable antigens of atopic dermatitis, were detected in 7 subjects. The levels were
reduced at the Treatment and Post-treatment time points, however, the differences were not significant. The
serum levels of ECP were significantly reduced at the Treatment (p<0.025) and Post-treatment time points
(p<0.0005). Also, serum total IgE was significantly reduced at the Post-treatment time point
(p<0.0005). However, there were no significant changes in the percentage of Th1/helper T cells,
Th2/helper T cells, Th1/Th2 and Treg/helper T cells during the trial.
Table 6.
The allergy related parameters of blood samples in Trial 2
Number of detected subject
Pre-treatment
Treatment
Post-treatment
Avg SD
p-value
Avg SD
p-value
Th1 (IFN+/IL4–)
(%)
16.5
±
7.9
16.5
±
6.92
0.9097
16.15
±
7.43
1
Th2 (IFN–/IL4+)
(%)
1.1
±
0.47
0.81
±
0.23
0.0566
0.9
±
0.4
0.292
Th1/Th2
(%)
21.58
±
27.34
23.69
±
17.16
0.0923
23.28
±
20.92
0.8394
Treg (CD25+Foxp3+)
(%)
1.48
±
0.63
1.44
±
0.68
0.6848
1.63
±
0.92
0.6848
Total IgE
(IU/ml)
314.62
±
352.48
285.23
±
308.14
0.105
227.31
±
232.23
0.0005***
Specific IgE for Japanese cedar pollen
(IU/ml)
9
30.31
±
33.44
22.87
±
27.74
0.0039**
18.65
±
22.02
0.0039**
Specific IgE for Japanese cypress pollen
(IU/ml)
9
1.97
±
3.6
1.53
±
2.73
0.0039**
1.17
±
1.98
0.0039**
Specific IgE for mites
(IU/ml)
7
24.04
±
34.67
25.69
±
37.34
0.375
21.78
±
29.91
0.1094
Specific IgE for house dust
(IU/ml)
7
24.26
±
34.94
25.09
±
37.23
0.2188
19.66
±
26.91
0.1094
ECP
(μg/l)
15.74
±
13.53
10.4
±
8.13
0.0105*
6.58
±
5.59
0.0002***
Blood samples were taken from 13 subjects. Data are shown as the mean ± SD. Specific IgEs for
Japanese cedar pollen and Japanese cypress pollen were not detected in 4 subjects. Specific IgEs for
mites and house dust were not detected in 6 subjects. The Pre-treatment time point was compared with
the Treatment and Post-treatment time points by paired t-test with Bonferroni correction (vs.
Pre-treatment), *p<0.05/2; **p<0.01/2; ***p<0.001/2
Blood samples were taken from 13 subjects. Data are shown as the mean ± SD. Specific IgEs for
Japanese cedar pollen and Japanese cypress pollen were not detected in 4 subjects. Specific IgEs for
mites and house dust were not detected in 6 subjects. The Pre-treatment time point was compared with
the Treatment and Post-treatment time points by paired t-test with Bonferroni correction (vs.
Pre-treatment), *p<0.05/2; **p<0.01/2; ***p<0.001/2
DISCUSSION
To determine whether LP0132-fermented juice alleviates symptoms of atopic dermatitis, two single-arm,
non-randomized, open trials, Trials 1 and 2, were conducted with overlapping adult subjects with mild to
moderate atopic dermatitis. The same design was used for 2 consecutive years. The present study demonstrated
that daily intake of LP0132-fermented juice significantly reduced the overall score (Fig. 2) and the subscore for the emotions domain (Fig.
3) in Skindex-16 compared with the scores before intake (Pre-treatment) in both trials. In Trial l, a
distinct improvement was observed in some subjects (Fig. 4), whose
QOLs were also remarkably enhanced. These findings suggest that LP0132-fermented juice has the potential to
improve symptoms in adult patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis.In Japan, there are seasonal variations in factors such as dryness, heavy sweating and pollen dispersal that
aggravate symptoms of atopic dermatitis. Many patients with atopic dermatitis experience aggravated symptoms
during the dry winter months [22]. Accordingly, both trials were
conducted from October to February to avoid heavy sweating and pollen dispersal. That is, the period between the
Treatment and Post-treatment time points was a dry season (December to February). Interestingly, significant
reductions in overall score (Fig. 2) and subscores for the emotions
domain (Fig. 3) in Skindex-16 were observed and maintained at a
constant level for 8 weeks, even after termination of daily intake of the test beverage (between the Treatment
and Post-treatment time points) in both trials. Moreover, exploratory analysis of 18 subjects in Trial 2 was
conducted to compare scores between the Treatment time point in Trial l and Pre-treatment time point in Trial 2
using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (Table 7). The results were significantly higher at the Pre-treatment time point in Trial 2 than at the
Treatment time point in Trial 1 for overall score (p=0.0020), the symptoms domain (p=0.0315), emotions domain
(p=0.0037) and the functioning domain (p=0.0234). These findings suggest that the improvements due to consuming
LP0132-fermented juice occurred not because of seasonal changes or temporary remission, but rather because of a
persistent effect lasting for at least the 8 weeks after termination of daily intake. However, it is prudent to
consider that the potential for improvement possibly decreased by about 10 months after terminating daily
intake, since data were not available for this time frame.
Table 7.
Comparison of Skindex-16 scores between the Treatment time point in Trial 1 and Pre-treatment time
point in Trial 2
Treatment in Trial 1
Pre-treatment in Trial 2
Avg SD
Avg SD
p-value
Symptoms domain score
1.40
±
1.38
2.28
±
1.56
0.0315*
Emotions domain score
1.38
±
1.40
2.30
±
1.78
0.0037**
Functioning domain score
0.28
±
0.58
0.64
±
1.09
0.0234*
Overall score
1.04
±
0.99
1.78
±
1.33
0.002**
Exploratory analysis was performed for 18 subjects who participated in both trials to examine the changes
that occurred in the period when the test beverage was not consumed (between the Treatment time point in
Trial 1 and the Pre-treatment time point in Trial 2). Data are shown as the mean ± SD. Statistical
differences were assessed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test (vs. Treatment time point in Trial 1). *p<0.05;
**p<0.01
Exploratory analysis was performed for 18 subjects who participated in both trials to examine the changes
that occurred in the period when the test beverage was not consumed (between the Treatment time point in
Trial 1 and the Pre-treatment time point in Trial 2). Data are shown as the mean ± SD. Statistical
differences were assessed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test (vs. Treatment time point in Trial 1). *p<0.05;
**p<0.01Changes in score for the 16 items of Skindex-16 showed a significant reduction in scores for all 7 emotions
domain items, “persistence/reoccurrence,” “worry,” “appearance,” “frustration,” “embarrassment,” “being annoyed”
and “feeling depressed”; 2 symptom domain items, “itching” and “being irritated”; and 3 functioning domain
items, “affecting interactions with others,” “daily activity” and “work or do what you enjoy” at the Treatment
time point in Trial 1. There were also significant reductions in scores for “persistence/reoccurrence,” “worry,”
“appearance” and “feeling depressed” in the emotions domain and “affecting interactions with others” in the
functioning domain at the Treatment time point in Trial 2. As mentioned above, the emotions domain subscore
showed the lowest p-value among all scores of Skindex-16 between the Treatment time point in Trial 1 and the
Pre-treatment time point in Trial 2 (Fig. 5). These findings suggest that the emotions domain is largely affected by improvement and aggravation of
atopic dermatitis. The improvement in these items with daily intake of LP0132-fermented juice therefore plays an
important role in enhancing QOL in patients.
Fig. 5.
Relative changes in immune-related parameters during Trial 2.
Values at the Pre-treatment time point were defined as baseline. The dot plots represent the relative
changes in parameters at the Treatment and Post-treatment time points compared with the Pre-treatment time
point. The effect of test beverage intake was evaluated by comparing changes at the Treatment and
Post-treatment time points with those at the Pre-treatment time point. (A) Eosinophil cationic protein
(ECP), (B) total immunoglobulin E (IgE), (C) Specific IgE for Japanese cedar pollen, (D) Specific IgE for
Japanese cypress pollen. Statistical differences were determined by Wilcoxon signed-rank test with
Bonferroni correction (vs. Pre-treatment). *p<0.05/2; **p<0.01/2; ***p<0.001/2.
Relative changes in immune-related parameters during Trial 2.Values at the Pre-treatment time point were defined as baseline. The dot plots represent the relative
changes in parameters at the Treatment and Post-treatment time points compared with the Pre-treatment time
point. The effect of test beverage intake was evaluated by comparing changes at the Treatment and
Post-treatment time points with those at the Pre-treatment time point. (A) Eosinophil cationic protein
(ECP), (B) total immunoglobulin E (IgE), (C) Specific IgE for Japanese cedar pollen, (D) Specific IgE for
Japanese cypress pollen. Statistical differences were determined by Wilcoxon signed-rank test with
Bonferroni correction (vs. Pre-treatment). *p<0.05/2; **p<0.01/2; ***p<0.001/2.Of 13 subjects who participated in Trials 1 and 2 and consented to collection of blood samples, a reduction in
the symptoms domain subscore was observed in 10 subjects in both trials and in 2 subjects in either Trial 1 or
2. One subject (ID No. 03) did not show any improvement in either trial (Fig.
6). Moreover, of all 13 subjects who participated in blood parameter analysis in Trial 2, specific IgEs for
Japanese cedar pollen and Japanese cypress pollen were detected in the same 9 subjects, and the levels were
reduced. ECP was also improved, with the exception of one subject (ID No. 03) (Fig. 7). In contrast, the 5 other subjects who participated in Trials 1 and 2 and did not consent to collection
of blood samples showed a reduction in the symptom domain subscore in both trials. It appears that all 18
subjects who participated in Trials 1 and 2 responded well to the LP0132-fermented juice, although some may have
experienced a time lag or low symptoms subscore at the Pre-treatment time point.
Fig. 6.
Subjects showing improvement of the symptoms domain subscore in Skindex-16 in Trials 1 and 2.
ID numbers of subjects showing improvements compared with the Pre-treatment time point in Trial 1 and
Trial 2 are shown within circles.
Fig. 7.
Subjects showing improvement of the symptoms domain subscore in Skindex-16 and blood parameters in Trial
2 compared with the Pre-treatment time point.
(A) Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), (B) Total immunoglobulin E (IgE), (C) Specific IgE for Japanese
cedar pollen, (D) Specific IgE for Japanese cypress pollen. ID numbers of subjects showing improvements
compared with the Pre-treatment time point in Trial 2 are shown within circles.
Subjects showing improvement of the symptoms domain subscore in Skindex-16 in Trials 1 and 2.ID numbers of subjects showing improvements compared with the Pre-treatment time point in Trial 1 and
Trial 2 are shown within circles.Subjects showing improvement of the symptoms domain subscore in Skindex-16 and blood parameters in Trial
2 compared with the Pre-treatment time point.(A) Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), (B) Total immunoglobulin E (IgE), (C) Specific IgE for Japanese
cedar pollen, (D) Specific IgE for Japanese cypress pollen. ID numbers of subjects showing improvements
compared with the Pre-treatment time point in Trial 2 are shown within circles.It has already been reported that LAB alleviates symptoms of atopic dermatitis in children [11] as well as adult subjects [12].
However, to the best of our knowledge, no clinical studies have demonstrated a significant improvement due to
LAB treatment in both symptoms and blood parameters of atopic dermatitis. This study demonstrated that daily
intake of LP0132-fermented juice significantly reduced serum levels of IgE, especially in specific IgEs for
Japanese cedar pollen and Japanese cypress pollen. Decreasing trends in specific IgEs for mites and house dust
were also observed at the Treatment and Post-treatment time points. The levels of ECP decreased at the Treatment
and Post-treatment time points. Our previous study found significant attenuation of serum total IgE, various
specific IgEs and ECP in subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis [23].
These observations suggest that LP0132-fermented juice supports improvement of allergy symptoms through
reduction of ECP and IgE.Our previous report showned that LP0132 stimulates IL-10 production in vitro [16]. It has been reported that IL-10 suppress IgE production from B cells
[24, 25]. Thus, IL-10 may be
involved in the possible mechanism of LP0132 inducing alterations in serum IgE levels. However, in the present
study, the serum levels of IL-10 were below the detection limit in all subjects. Ohmen et al. [26] reported that IL-10 mRNA is over-repressed in the skin lesion of patients
with atopic dermatitis. It may be that IL-10 was induced from intestinal immune cells by LP0132 and that the
levels increased in only local sites such as the skin lesion of atopic dermatitis.Kaji et al. [5] reported that teichoic acids and the conformation of the
cell wall of L. plantarum play an important role in inducing IL-10 production. Therefore, it is
speculated that the cell wall of LP0132 is a major active component in the fermented juice. Hesperidin has also
been reported to exert anti-allergy activity in vitro and in animal models [13, 14]. Citrus juice-derived
components and fermented products might have minor roles, and it might be possible that the combination of them
results in synergistic or additive anti-allergy effects.In conclusion, this study demonstrated that daily intake of fermented citrus juice containing heat-killed
LP0132 has beneficial effects on symptoms and QOL in patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis due to
immunomodulating activity via the attenuation of IgE and ECP. Further studies are now necessary to obtain
further evidence in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and to clarify the mechanism both in
vitro and in animal studies.
Authors: Oscar Palomares; Görkem Yaman; Ahmet K Azkur; Tunc Akkoc; Mübeccel Akdis; Cezmi A Akdis Journal: Eur J Immunol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: J-Z Xiao; S Kondo; N Yanagisawa; N Takahashi; T Odamaki; N Iwabuchi; K Miyaji; K Iwatsuki; H Togashi; K Enomoto; T Enomoto Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: J D Ohmen; J M Hanifin; B J Nickoloff; T H Rea; R Wyzykowski; J Kim; D Jullien; T McHugh; A S Nassif; S C Chan Journal: J Immunol Date: 1995-02-15 Impact factor: 5.422