| Literature DB >> 26858829 |
Noriko Shinoda1, Satoshi Mitarai2, Eri Suzuki3, Mineo Watanabe4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multi-drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis has been an important problem in public health around the world. However, limited information about disinfectant-susceptibility of multi-drug-resistant strain of M. tuberculosis was available.Entities:
Keywords: Disinfectant; Microbicide; Multi-drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Year: 2016 PMID: 26858829 PMCID: PMC4745152 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-016-0102-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ISSN: 2047-2994 Impact factor: 4.887
M. tuberculosis strains used in this study
| Strain | Place | Year | Multidrug resistance | Disinfectant | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADEG | CG | PI | BK | OX | CS | EtOH | BK + EtOH | ||||
| H37Rv | US | 1934 | Type strain | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 2A-3-6 | Japan | 2002 | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | – |
| 2E-1-9 | Japan | 2002 | – | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – |
| 2U-5-12 | Japan | 2002 | – | – | – | + | – | + | + | – | – |
| 2U-11-2 | Japan | 2002 | – | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – |
| 2Z-1-3 | Japan | 2002 | – | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | – |
| LV-15 | Japan | 2008 | INH, RFP, SM, EB, LVFX | – | + | + | + | + | + | – | – |
| LV-36 | Japan | 2010 | INH, RFP, SM | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | + |
| LV-79 | Japan | 2009 | INH, RFP, SM, LVFX | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
INH, isoniazid; RFP, rifampicin; SM, streptomycin; EB, ethambutol; and LVFX, levofloxacin, ADEG alkyldiaminoethylglycine-HCl (0.2 % W/V); CG chlorhexidine gluconate (0.1 % W/V); PI, povidine iodine (10 mg/ml as active iodine); BK benzalkonium-HCl (0.1 % W/V); OX oxydol (3 % W/V); CS cresol soap (2 % V/V); EtOH ethanol (70 % V/V); and BK + EtOH benzalkonium-HCl (0.1 % W/V) + ethanol (70 % V/V)
+: the disinfectant inhibited growth of the bacteria (effective disinfectants)
−: the disinfectant did not inhibit growth of the bacteria (not effective)
Fig. 1Efficacy of disinfectants to M. tuberculosis stains. Each M. tuberculosis stain was exposed to the disinfectants for 1 min at room temperature. The bacteria were incubated in Middlebrook 7H9 broth for 14 days at 37 °C. Bacterial growth was measured by 16S rRNA targeted real-time qPCR. Control was not exposure by any disinfectants. Dashed line indicates the genome copy number on the day of inoculation. ADEG, alkyldiaminoethylglycine-HCl (0.2 % W/V); CG, chlorhexidine gluconate (0.1 % W/V); PI, povidine iodine (10 mg/ml as active iodine); BK, benzalkonium-HCl (0.1 % W/V); OX, oxydol (3 % W/V); CS, cresol soap (2 % V/V); EtOH, ethanol (70 % V/V); and BK + EtOH, benzalkonium-HCl (0.1 % W/V) + ethanol (70 % V/V). The results are expressed as means ± SD. *: p <0.05 (v.s. genome number on the day of inoculation). Black bars: the disinfectant inhibited growth of M. tuberculosis (effective disinfectant). White bars: the disinfectant did not inhibit growth of the bacteria (not effective)