| Literature DB >> 26858750 |
Stefan Sorin Arama1, Catalin Tiliscan2, Cristina Negoita3, Alexandru Croitoru4, Victoria Arama5, Carmen Marina Mihai6, Florinel Pop7, Amit Garg8.
Abstract
Objective. This study compared the eradication rates of of Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection by a 7-day and 14-day anti-HP regimen. Materials and Methods. An open, randomized, prospective study was performed to evaluate the response to anti-HP treatment in adult HP-positive patients following a 7-day course (Regimen A) of a proton pump inhibitor in association with clarithromycin and amoxicillin compared to a 14-day course (Regimen B). Gastric biopsies were performed at baseline and two months after anti-HP treatment. Results. Seventy-eight patients aged 18-64 years (28 males, 50 females) diagnosed with HP infection were included. Fifty-two (66.7%) patients received Regimen B and 26 (33.3%) Regimen A. The overall eradication rate was 70.5%. Better treatment response (p < 0.01) was seen in Regimen B (44/52, 84.2% versus 11/26, 42.3%). Significant improvement in histological features was seen in regimen B. There has been significant overall reduction in endoscopic aspects of gastric and duodenal lesions in both regimens. Younger patients ≤35 years had a better response to Regimen B. Better treatment response was seen in women, urban residents, and those with tertiary level of education in both groups. Conclusion. 14-day anti-HP regimen offered a significant better overall eradication of HP in study population.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26858750 PMCID: PMC4706907 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5061640
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract ISSN: 1687-6121 Impact factor: 2.260
Comparison of demography, disease characteristics, and outcome among Regimen A and Regimen B.
| Characteristics | Seven-day treatment (Regimen A) | 14-day treatment (Regimen B) | Total | 95% confidence interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demography | ||||
| Number of patients | 26 (33.3%) | 52 (66.7%) | 78 | NA |
| Male : female | 9 : 17 | 19 : 33 | 28 : 50 | NA |
| Mean age | 45 | 38 | 40 | 18–64 |
| Tertiary level of education | 6 (23.1%) | 26 (50.0%) | 32 (42.7%) | NA |
| Alcohol intake | 8 (30.8%) | 27 (51.9%) | 35 (46.7%) | NA |
| Smoking | 10 (38.5%) | 22 (42.3%) | 32 (42.7%) | NA |
| Urban residency | 21 (80.8%) | 44 (84.6%) | 65 (85.9%) | NA |
| Rural residency | 5 (19.2%) | 6 (11.5%) | 11 (14.1%) | NA |
| Disease characteristics | ||||
| High histologic activity | 18 (23.7%) | NA | ||
| After treatment | ||||
| Eradication of | 11 (42.3%) | 44 (84.6%) | 55 (70.5%) | NA |
| Treatment response in men | 05 (19.2%) | 17 (32.7%) | 22 | NA |
| Treatment response in women | 06 (23.1%) | 27 (51.9%) | 33 | NA |
| Treatment response in tertiary level education | 04 (15.4%) | 23 (44.2%) | 27 | NA |
| Treatment response in those with lower level education | 7 (26.9%) | 19 (36.5%) | 26 | NA |
| Treatment response in alcohol consumers | 03 (11.5%) | 23 (44.2%) | 26 | NA |
| Treatment response in smokers | 03 (11.5%) | 21 (40.4%) | 24 | NA |
| Treatment response in rural residents | 01 (3.8%) | 05 (9.6%) | 06 | NA |
| Treatment response in urban residents | 10 (38.5%) | 38 (73.1%) | 48 | NA |
| Normal endoscopy | 05 (19.2%) | 08 (15.4%) | 13 | NA |
P < 0.05.
Endoscopic features before and after treatment in both groups.
| Seven-day regimen | 14-day regimen | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretreatment | Posttreatment | Pretreatment | Posttreatment | |
| Number of patients | 26 (33.3%) | 26 (33.3%) | 52 (66.7%) | 52 (66.7%) |
| Oesophagitis | 2 (7.7%) | 2 (7.7%) | 6 (11.5%) | 4 (7.7%) |
| Stage A | 0 (0%) | 02 (7.7%) | 2 (3.8%) | 04 (7.7%) |
| Stage B | 02 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) |
| Gastritis | 22 (84.6%) | 15 (57.7%) | 51 (98.1%) | 29 (55.8%) |
| Erythematous gastritis | 10 (38.5%) | 14 (53.8%) | 39 (75.0%) | 28 (53.8%) |
| Exudative gastritis | 10 (38.5%) | 01 (3.8%) | 08 (15.4%) | 01 (1.9%) |
| Erosive gastritis | 02 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) | 04 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) |
| Site of gastritis | ||||
| Antral | 13 (50.0%) | 14 (53.8%) | 44 (84.0%) | 28 (53.8%) |
| Corporal | 01 (3.8%) | 0 (0%) | 02 (3.8%) | 0 (0%) |
| Pangastric | 08 (30.8%) | 01 (3.8%) | 05 (9.6%) | 01 (1.9%) |
| Duodenitis | 9 (34.6%) | 5 (19.2%) | 14 (26.9%) | 3 (5.8%) |
| Erythematous duodenitis | 0 (0%) | 02 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Exudative duodenitis | 05 (19.2%) | 03 (11.5%) | 05 (9.6%) | 02 (3.8%) |
| Erosive duodenitis | 04 (15.4%) | 0 (0%) | 09 (17.3%) | 01 (1.9%) |
| Gastric ulcer | 3 (11.5%) | 1 (3.8%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) |
| Duodenal ulcer | 4 (15.4%) | 1 (3.8%) | 2 (3.8%) | 1 (1.9%) |
Figure 1Vacuolising lesions of the foveolar epithelium. Numerous HP (H. pylori) colonies are visible in the foveolar mucus. (Alcian yellow stain; 40x magnification.)
Figure 2Numerous HP colonies on the surface of the foveolar epithelium. Epithelial cells present marked vacuolising lesions and destruction of the apical pole, giving the impression of intracellular HP invasion. (IHC, ACMo Anti-HP Biocare, clone BC 7; 40x magnification.)
Figure 3Healing processes after 7-day therapy: marked reduction of vacuolising lesions, restoring of foveolar architecture, reduction of inflammatory reaction, and persistence of HP colonies. (Alcian yellow; 20x magnification.)