| Literature DB >> 26858370 |
Sachiko Ozawa1, Samantha Clark2, Allison Portnoy3, Simrun Grewal4, Logan Brenzel5, Damian G Walker6.
Abstract
An analysis of return on investment can help policy makers support, optimize, and advocate for the expansion of immunization programs in the world's poorest countries. We assessed the return on investment associated with achieving projected coverage levels for vaccinations to prevent diseases related to ten antigens in ninety-four low- and middle-income countries during 2011-20, the Decade of Vaccines. We derived these estimates by using costs of vaccines, supply chains, and service delivery and their associated economic benefits. Based on the costs of illnesses averted, we estimated that projected immunizations will yield a net return about 16 times greater than costs over the decade (uncertainty range: 10-25). Using a full-income approach, which quantifies the value that people place on living longer and healthier lives, we found that net returns amounted to 44 times the costs (uncertainty range: 27-67). Across all antigens, net returns were greater than costs. But to realize the substantial positive return on investment from immunization programs, it is essential that governments and donors provide the requisite investments. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.Entities:
Keywords: Developing World < International/global health studies; Health Economics; Health Spending; Maternal And Child Health; Public Health
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26858370 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1086
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) ISSN: 0278-2715 Impact factor: 6.301