| Literature DB >> 26858330 |
Daniele Rosellini1, Nicoletta Ferradini2, Stefano Allegrucci2, Stefano Capomaccio2, Elisa Debora Zago3, Paola Leonetti4, Bachir Balech5, Riccardo Aversano6, Domenico Carputo6, Lara Reale2, Fabio Veronesi2.
Abstract
Polyploidization as the consequence of 2n gamete formation is a prominent mechanism in plant evolution. Studying its effects on the genome, and on genome expression, has both basic and applied interest. We crossed two diploid (2n = 2x = 16) Medicago sativa plants, a subsp. falcata seed parent, and a coerulea × falcata pollen parent that form a mixture of n and 2n eggs and pollen, respectively. Such a cross produced full-sib diploid and tetraploid (2n = 4x = 32) hybrids, the latter being the result of bilateral sexual polyploidization (BSP). These unique materials allowed us to investigate the effects of BSP, and to separate the effect of intraspecific hybridization from those of polyploidization by comparing 2x with 4x full sib progeny plants. Simple sequence repeat marker segregation demonstrated tetrasomic inheritance for all chromosomes but one, demonstrating that these neotetraploids are true autotetraploids. BSP brought about increased biomass, earlier flowering, higher seed set and weight, and larger leaves with larger cells. Microarray analyses with M. truncatula gene chips showed that several hundred genes, related to diverse metabolic functions, changed their expression level as a consequence of polyploidization. In addition, cytosine methylation increased in 2x, but not in 4x, hybrids. Our results indicate that sexual polyploidization induces significant transcriptional novelty, possibly mediated in part by DNA methylation, and phenotypic novelty that could underpin improved adaptation and reproductive success of tetraploid M. sativa with respect to its diploid progenitor. These polyploidy-induced changes may have promoted the adoption of tetraploid alfalfa in agriculture.Entities:
Keywords: DNA methylation; alfalfa; polysomic polyploids; tetrasomic inheritance; transcriptome
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26858330 PMCID: PMC4825662 DOI: 10.1534/g3.115.026021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Figure 1Obtaining diploid and tetraploid hybrids. PG-F9 and 12P are diploid plants that produce a significant percentage of 2n eggs and pollen, respectively. The PG-F9 × 12P cross produced 2x and 4x hybrids. The typical greenish flower color derives from crossing yellow-flowered PG-F9 with purple-flowered 12P.
Summary of the results of χ2 analysis of segregation mode of SSR markers mapping on all chromosomes in the three BSP plants
| Significance of Chi Square Values | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chromosome | S29 | S48 | S60 | |||
| Disomic | Tetrasomic | Disomic | Tetrasomic | Disomic | Tetrasomic | |
| I | ** | NS | ** | NS | ** | NS |
| II | * | ** | NT | NS | ** | NS |
| III | ** | NS | ** | NS | NT | NS |
| IV | NT | NS | NT | NS | NT | ** |
| V | * | * | NS | ** | NS | ** |
| ** | NS | NS | ** | |||
| VI | ** | NS | NT | NS | ** | NS |
| VII | ** | NS | NS | ** | — | — |
| VIII | ** | NS | NS | NS | NT | NS |
Significant at P ≤ 0.05; **significant at P ≤ 0.01. NS, not significant; NT, nontestable (because one or more of the expected numbers is 0).
See Table S3, Table S4, and Table S5 for marker segregation data in single progenies of the three BSP plants.
Data from two SSR loci of chromosome V are available for plants S29 and S60.
Figure 3Leaf morphology and dry matter yield of parental genotypes, their mean, and comparisons of the mean with those of 2x and 4x hybrids (three genotypes per ploidy level). (A) Central leaflet surface area (n = 20 per genotype). (B) Ratio between length and width of the central leaflet (n = 20 per genotype). (C) Surface area of epidermal cells (n = 20 per genotype). (D) and (E) Size of stomata of adaxial and abaxial leaf epidermis, calculated from their axes length. (F) and (G) Number of stomata per mm2 of adaxial and abaxial leaf epidermis (n = 20 per genotype), (H)–(J) Dry matter per plant at each of three consecutive cuts at 10% flowering (n = 2–6 per genotype). Different letters above columns indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 (see text for details on statistical analyses).
Figure 4Reproductive traits of parental genotypes, their means, and comparisons with 2x and 4x hybrids (three genotypes per progeny per ploidy level). (A) and (B) Flowering dates of two consecutive regrowths (A, days from June 1; B days from previous cut; n = 2–7 per genotype). (C) Number of ovules per ovary (n = 20–22 per genotype). (D) Percentage of callosized ovules, estimating ovule sterility (n = 20 per genotype). (E) Pollen diameter (n = 30–55 per genotype). (F) Seeds produced per floret upon hand pollinations with an unrelated pollen parent of the same ploidy level (n = 8–30 florets for each of four racemes, used as replications). Genotype by environment and ploidy × environment interactions for seed set were not significant (not shown), so the mean data across environments are presented (Table S12). (G) Weight of 1000 seeds (n = 23–291 per genotype). Different letters above columns indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 (see text for details on statistical analyses).
Figure 2Determination of the ploidy state of 2x and 4x progeny plants (one plant per ploidy state is shown as an example). In 4x plants, leaf size is larger, and leaflets shape are less elongated, seeds are bigger, and the number of chloroplasts in stomata guard cells is higher (for example, S16-2x, 8 chloroplasts; S29-4x, 13 chloroplasts) than in 2x plants. Root tip cell chromosomes counts (for example, S16-2x, 16 chromosomes; S29-4x, 32 chromosomes) confirmed the ploidy estimation based on morphological traits (see text for details).
Figure 5Venn diagram summarizing the results of the microarray experiment. Pink: genes differing in transcription level between the parents and the 2x progeny (Hybridization-sensitive, HS). Green: genes differing between the parents and the 4x hybrids (Hybridization and Polyploidization sensitive, HPS). Blue: genes differing between the 2x and the 4x hybrids (Polyploidization sensitive, PS). The red arrows refer to subset of genes that are underexpressed in the former group of each comparison, while the green arrows refer to the subset of genes that are overexpressed in the former group of each comparison.
Figure 6Number of differentially expressed genes in single genotype comparisons. The red bar corresponds to the genes overexpressed in the first genotype of each comparison, the blue bar to the genes overexpressed in the second genotype of each comparison.
Numbers of genes whose transcription levels differed significantly between single progeny plants and the parental mean
| 2x Hybrids | 4x Hybrids | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S8-2x | S16-2x | S24-2x | Mean | S29-4x | S48-4x | S60-4x | Mean | |
| Overexpressed (O) | 236 | 240 | 562 | 346 | 432 | 818 | 393 | 547 |
| Underexpressed (U) | 74 | 117 | 490 | 227 | 299 | 680 | 404 | 461 |
| Ratio O/U | 3.19 | 2.05 | 1.15 | 2.13 | 1.44 | 1.20 | 0.97 | 1.20 |
| Differentially expressed (O+U) | 310 | 357 | 1052 | 573 | 731 | 1498 | 797 | 1009 |
| Percentage differentially expressed | 0.75 | 0.86 | 2.53 | 1.38 | 1.76 | 3.61 | 1.92 | 2.43 |
Transcripts differentially expressed between 2x and 4x hybrids whose GO IDs are significantly enriched in the polyploidization-sensitive group of genes with respect to the genes present on the microarray, according to BiNGO analysis
| Gene | Log2 2x/4x Expression | Best Blast Hit | E Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4x > 2x | |||
| TC172620 | −4.419 | XP_003622001.1: Heat shock protein Hsp70, | 0.0 |
| TC198142 | −2.17 | XP_003636970.1: Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small chain 3A, | 3e-118 |
| TC183902 | −1.723 | AAC25775.1: Chlorophyll | 1e-90 |
| TC177786 | −1.697 | AAC25775.1: Chlorophyll | 2e-167 |
| TC201583 | −1.59 | XP_003627181.1: Lipoxygenase, | 0.0 |
| TC173777 | −1.571 | XP_003627187.1: Lipoxygenase, | 0.0 |
| TC195187 | −1.537 | AAC25775.1: Chlorophyll | 2e-167 |
| TC178665 | −1.305 | XP_004505250.1: UDP-glucose flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase 7-like, | 0.0 |
| TC174046 | −1.293 | XP_003610706.1: Photosystem I reaction center subunit II, | 9e-138 |
| TC178639 | −1.226 | XP_003627185.1: Lipoxygenase, | 0.0 |
| TC180095 | −1.168 | XP_003618482.1: Chlorophyll | 4e-131 |
| TC188202 | −1.158 | AAC25775.1: Chlorophyll | 7e-101 |
| TC182218 | −1.154 | XP_003592196.1: Heat shock protein, | 1e-180 |
| TC179482 | −1.058 | XP_003618482.1: Chlorophyll | 2e-174 |
| TC172508 | −1.001 | XP_003627196.1: Lipoxygenase, | 0.0 |
| 4x < 2x | |||
| TC179350 | 1.042 | XP_003617150.1: Protein kinase 2B, | 0.0 |
| TC176016 | 1.056 | XP_003626805.1: 10 kDa chaperonin, | 0.0 |
| TC185299 | 1.063 | CAH05011.1: Alpha-dioxygenase, | 0.0 |
| TC176166 | 1.078 | XP_003594497.1: Peroxidase, | 0.0 |
| TC200070 | 1.187 | XP_003623202.1: Glutathione S-transferase GST 8, | 2e-159 |
| TC186568 | 1.203 | XP_003591357.1: Myb-like transcription factor, | 2e-179 |
| TC183565 | 1.286 | XP_003604514.1: Disease resistance response protein, | 1e-135 |
| TC179158 | 1.602 | XP_003618998.1: GDSL esterase/lipase, | 0.0 |
| TC173466 | 1.983 | XP_003609791.1: DNA replication licensing factor mcm2, | 0.0 |
| TC175139 | 2.088 | XP_003625706.1: Thaumatin-like protein, | 2e-180 |
The genes are listed according to decreasing Log2 2x/4x expression ratio: negative values mean that the gene has higher expression in 4x that in 2x plants, and vice-versa. The best blast hit of each transcript and its E value are presented.
Best hit from Blastx as of March 15, 2014. When the best hit was an ’unknown protein’ the best annotated hit was taken instead.
Figure 7The average cytosine methylation levels in PG—F9 and 12P parents (gray bars), and their 2x and 4x hybrid hybrids (black bars). (A) Methylation changes at hemi-methylated sites. (B) methylation changes at fully methylated sites. ** Different at P < 0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test.
Results of MSAP analysis
| Genotypes | Total | Monomorphic | Parental Pattern Inheritance | Nonparental Pattern Inheritance | Ambiguous | MR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG-F9 like | 12-P like | Demethylation | ||||||
| 2x progenies | ||||||||
| S8 | 221 | 100 | 41 (18.55) | 28 (12.67) | 24 (10.86) | 22 (9.95) | 6 (2.71) | 0.9 |
| S16 | 235 | 101 (42.98) | 54 (22.98) | 21 (8.94) | 26 (11.06) | 27 (11.49) | 6 (2.55) | 1.0 |
| S24 | 234 | 87 (37.18) | 43 (18.38) | 39 (16.67) | 16 (6.84) | 46 (19.66) | 3 (1.28) | 2.9 |
| Total | 690 | 288 (41.74) | 138 (20.00) | 88 (12.75) | 66 (9.57) | 95 (13.77) | 15 (2.17) | 1.4 |
| 4x progenies | ||||||||
| S29 | 250 | 90 (36.00) | 63 (25.20) | 30 (12.00) | 30 (12.00) | 33 (13.20) | 4 (1.60) | 1.1 |
| S48 | 242 | 79 (32.64) | 50 (20.66) | 42 (17.36) | 42 (17.36) | 28 (11.57) | 1 (0.41) | 0.7 |
| S60 | 250 | 87 (34.80) | 41 (16.40) | 43 (17.20) | 43 (17.20) | 32 (12.80) | 4 (1.60) | 0.7 |
| 742 | 256 (34.50) | 154 (20.75) | 115 (15.50) | 115 (15.50) | 93 (12.53) | 9 (1.21) | 0.8 | |
Number and percentage of methylation markers scored in each 2x or 4x hybrid in comparison with their parents. MR, methylation ratio.
Methylation changes difficult to interpret according to Fulneček and Kovařík (2014).
MR: methylation ratio is the percent ratio of the number of markers revealing de novo methylation over the number of markers revealing demethylation.
The number of corresponding sites.
The frequency of the corresponding sites.
These two figures differ significantly at P ≤ 0.05.
Figure 8Results of principal coordinates analysis (PCA) of MSAP patterns. The first two coordinates (PCO1 and PCO2) are displayed with the indication of the percentage of variance explained in brackets. Labels indicate the centroids of each group.