| Literature DB >> 26857963 |
Shoyebmohamad F Shaikh1,2, Rajaram S Mane3, Byoung Koun Min1,2,4, Yun Jeong Hwang1,2, Oh-shim Joo1,2.
Abstract
Using a simple hydrothermal synthesis, the crystal structure of TiO2 nanoparticles was controlled from rutile to anatase using a sugar alcohol, D-sorbitol. Adding small amounts of D-sorbitol to an aqueous TiCl4 solution resulted in changes in the crystal phase, particle size, and surface area by affecting the hydrolysis rate of TiCl4. These changes led to improvements of the solar-to-electrical power conversion efficiency (η) of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC) fabricated using these nanoparticles. A postulated reaction mechanism concerning the role of D-sorbitol in the formation of rutile and anatase was proposed. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, (13)C NMR spectroscopy, and dynamic light scattering analyses were used to better understand the interaction between the Ti precursor and D-sorbitol. The crystal phase and size of the synthesized TiO2 nanocrystallites as well as photovoltaic performance of the DSSC were examined using X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, field-emission scanning electron microscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, and photocurrent density-applied voltage spectroscopy measurement techniques. The DSSC fabricated using the anatase TiO2 nanoparticles synthesized in the presence of D-sorbitol, exhibited an enhanced η (6%, 1.5-fold improvement) compared with the device fabricated using the rutile TiO2 synthesized without D-sorbitol.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26857963 PMCID: PMC4746568 DOI: 10.1038/srep20103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Reaction mechanism for the formation of anatase TiO2.
Figure 2FT-IR spectra powder pellet of; (a) pure D-sorbitol and (b) an intermediate complex of TiO2–D-sorbitol. 13C NMR spectra of (c) 0.1M D-sorbitol in aqueous solution of pH = 0.6 and (d) 1M TiCl4–0.1M D-sorbitol in aqueous solution of pH = 0.6. D2O was used as an external standard.
Figure 3FE-SEM images of; (a) rutile-TiO2 and (b) anatase-TiO2; HR-TEM images of (c) rutile-TiO2 and (d) anatase-TiO2, and SAED patterns of; (e) rutile-TiO2 and (f) anatase-TiO2. Rutile-TiO2 was obtained when D-sorbitol was not used, whereas anatase-TiO2 was obtained when D-sorbitol was used.
Figure 4(a) XRD, and (b) Raman spectra of rutile and anatase TiO2 nanocrystallites.
DSSC parameters of various TiO2 nanocrystallite photoanodes.
| Photoanode | Crystalsize (nm) | Dye Adsorption[×10−7mol cm−2] | Jsc (mA cm−2) | Voc (V) | FF | η (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rutile TiO2 | 19.5 | 0.42 | 7.96 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 3.8 |
| Anatase TiO2 | 15.1 | 0.95 | 12.19 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 6.0 |
| Commercial anatase TiO2 | 16.2 | 0.81 | 12.25 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 5.8 |
Figure 5DLS spectra of; (a) 1M TiCl4 in aqueous solution, (b) TiCl4–0.05MD-sorbitol, and (c) TiCl4-0.1M D-sorbitol in aqueous solution and (d) diagram of room-temperature hydrolysis reaction of TiO2.
Figure 6BET analysis (the inset shows the pore size distribution of TiO2 nanocrystallites).
Figure 7(a) UV–Vis, (b) J–V curve, (c) EIS, and (d) τ (vs.Voc) measurements of various TiO2 nanocrystal DSSC-photoanodes.