Nii Koney1, Alexandra Roudenko2, Maryann Ro2, Sumeet Bahl2, Alexander Kagen2. 1. Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai West & Mount Sinai St Luke's, New York, New York. Electronic address: nkoney@chpnet.org. 2. Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai West & Mount Sinai St Luke's, New York, New York.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The evolving health care landscape demands a multidisciplinary approach to care and increased emphasis on patient engagement. Radiologists may play an important role in this respect, by improving patient agency and understanding through direct patient interaction. The purpose of this study is to assess patient preferences and perceptions regarding direct communication with radiologists, focusing on a medically underserved demographic. METHODS: Our institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study. English- and/or Spanish-speaking adults undergoing imaging studies across two tertiary-care hospitals and a busy outpatient center were surveyed over a consecutive two-month period, to assess knowledge of the role of a radiologist, interest in, and perceived benefits of reviewing examination results with imaging experts. RESULTS: A total of 628 surveys were completed: 20% of total respondents accurately identified the role of radiologists; 28% identified radiologists as doctors. A total of 68% of respondents expressed an interest in receiving imaging results immediately, or whenever results became available, regardless of when referring physicians received results. An interest in reviewing imaging results with an expert was indicated by 81% of respondents; 88% anticipated that reviewing imaging results with an expert would be beneficial. Although 58% of respondents indicated that they might be willing to pay out of pocket for such a service, 50% selected $0 when asked to indicate an amount. CONCLUSIONS: Although most patients do not know the role of radiologists, they want immediate results, and perceive value in consulting directly with imaging experts.
PURPOSE: The evolving health care landscape demands a multidisciplinary approach to care and increased emphasis on patient engagement. Radiologists may play an important role in this respect, by improving patient agency and understanding through direct patient interaction. The purpose of this study is to assess patient preferences and perceptions regarding direct communication with radiologists, focusing on a medically underserved demographic. METHODS: Our institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study. English- and/or Spanish-speaking adults undergoing imaging studies across two tertiary-care hospitals and a busy outpatient center were surveyed over a consecutive two-month period, to assess knowledge of the role of a radiologist, interest in, and perceived benefits of reviewing examination results with imaging experts. RESULTS: A total of 628 surveys were completed: 20% of total respondents accurately identified the role of radiologists; 28% identified radiologists as doctors. A total of 68% of respondents expressed an interest in receiving imaging results immediately, or whenever results became available, regardless of when referring physicians received results. An interest in reviewing imaging results with an expert was indicated by 81% of respondents; 88% anticipated that reviewing imaging results with an expert would be beneficial. Although 58% of respondents indicated that they might be willing to pay out of pocket for such a service, 50% selected $0 when asked to indicate an amount. CONCLUSIONS: Although most patients do not know the role of radiologists, they want immediate results, and perceive value in consulting directly with imaging experts.
Authors: Andreas Gutzeit; Regine Heiland; Sonja Sudarski; Johannes M Froehlich; Klaus Hergan; Matthias Meissnitzer; Sebastian Kos; Peter Bertke; Orpheus Kolokythas; Dow M Koh Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Andrew W Phillips; Rebecca A Landon; Gregory S Stacy; Larry Dixon; Andrea L Magee; Stephen D Thomas; Xi Dai; Christopher Straus Journal: Cureus Date: 2020-05-17
Authors: Andreas Gutzeit; Arne Fischmann; Rosemarie Forstner; Romana Goette; Bernhard Herzog; Claudia Kurtz; Chantal Hebler; Andrea Ladinger; Johannes M Froehlich; Janusch Blautzik; Orpheus Kolokythas; Simon Matoori; Sebastian Kos; Carolin Reischauer; Hubert Schefer; Peter Dubsky; Simon Peter Gampenrieder; Klaus Hergan; Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Dow-Mu Koh; Matthias Meissnitzer Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 3.909
Authors: Selina Largiader; Andreas Gutzeit; Elisabeth Sartoretti; Thomas Sartoretti; Dow Mu Koh; Sabine Sartoretti-Schefer; Sebastian Kos; Romana Goette; Ricardo Donners; Robyn Benz; Johannes M Froehlich; Simon Matoori; Peter Dubsky; Tino Plümecke; Rosemarie Forstner; Willibald Ruch; Matthias Meissnitzer; Klaus Hergan Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2022-10-08 Impact factor: 5.605
Authors: Monica Zigman Suchsland; Maria Jessica Cruz; Victoria Hardy; Jeffrey Jarvik; Gianna McMillan; Anne Brittain; Matthew Thompson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-07-20 Impact factor: 2.692