Literature DB >> 26857451

Volatile signature for the early diagnosis of lung cancer.

Roberto Gasparri1, Marco Santonico, Claudia Valentini, Giulia Sedda, Alessandro Borri, Francesco Petrella, Patrick Maisonneuve, Giorgio Pennazza, Arnaldo D'Amico, Corrado Di Natale, Roberto Paolesse, Lorenzo Spaggiari.   

Abstract

Exhaled breath contains hundreds of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Several independent researchers point out that the breath of lung cancer patients shows a characteristic VOC-profile which can be considered as lung cancer signature and, thus, used for diagnosis. In this regard, the analysis of exhaled breath with gas sensor arrays is a potential non-invasive, relatively low-cost and easy technique for the early detection of lung cancer. This clinical study evaluated the gas sensor array response for the identification of the exhaled breath of lung cancer patients. This study involved 146 individuals: 70 with lung cancer confirmed by computerized tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography-(PET) imaging techniques and histology (biopsy) or with clinical suspect of lung cancer and 76 healthy controls. Their exhaled breath was measured with a gas sensor array composed of a matrix of eight quartz microbalances (QMBs), each functionalized with a different metalloporphyrin. The instrument produces, for each analyzed sample, a vector of signals encoding the breath (breathprint). Breathprints were analyzed with multivariate analysis in order to correlate the sensor signals to the disease. Breathprints of the lung cancer patients were differentiated from those of the healthy controls with a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 91%. Similar values were obtained in patients with and without metabolic comorbidities, such as diabetes, obesity and dyslipidemia (sensitivity 85%, specificity 88% and sensitivity 76%, specificity 94%, respectively). The device showed a large sensitivity to lung cancer at stage I with respect to stage II/III/IV (92% and 58% respectively). The sensitivity for stage I did not change for patients with or without metabolic comorbidities (90%, 94%, respectively). Results show that this electronic nose can discriminate the exhaled breath of the lung cancer patients from those of the healthy controls. Moreover, the largest sensitivity is observed for the subgroup of patients with a lung cancer at stage I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26857451     DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/10/1/016007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breath Res        ISSN: 1752-7155            Impact factor:   3.262


  28 in total

Review 1.  Electronic Nose Technology in Respiratory Diseases.

Authors:  Silvano Dragonieri; Giorgio Pennazza; Pierluigi Carratu; Onofrio Resta
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 2.  Canine olfaction as an alternative to analytical instruments for disease diagnosis: understanding 'dog personality' to achieve reproducible results.

Authors:  Klaus Hackner; Joachim Pleil
Journal:  J Breath Res       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.262

3.  Integrating exhaled breath diagnostics by disease-sniffing dogs with instrumental laboratory analysis.

Authors:  Joachim Pleil; Roger Giese
Journal:  J Breath Res       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.262

Review 4.  Breath Analysis: A Promising Tool for Disease Diagnosis-The Role of Sensors.

Authors:  Maria Kaloumenou; Evangelos Skotadis; Nefeli Lagopati; Efstathios Efstathopoulos; Dimitris Tsoukalas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Diagnostic Performance of Electronic Noses in Cancer Diagnoses Using Exhaled Breath: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Max H M C Scheepers; Zaid Al-Difaie; Lloyd Brandts; Andrea Peeters; Bart van Grinsven; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

Review 6.  Animal-Free Chemical Safety Assessment.

Authors:  George D Loizou
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 7.  Exhaled breath analysis for the early detection of lung cancer: recent developments and future prospects.

Authors:  Inbar Nardi-Agmon; Nir Peled
Journal:  Lung Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2017-05-17

8.  Sensor Array and Gas Chromatographic Detection of the Blood Serum Volatolomic Signature of COVID-19.

Authors:  Yolande Ketchanji Mougang; Lorena Di Zazzo; Marilena Minieri; Rosamaria Capuano; Alexandro Catini; Jacopo Maria Legramente; Roberto Paolesse; Sergio Bernardini; Corrado Di Natale
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-07-10

Review 9.  Electronic Noses for Well-Being: Breath Analysis and Energy Expenditure.

Authors:  Julian W Gardner; Timothy A Vincent
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study.

Authors:  Kevin Lamote; Paul Brinkman; Lore Vandermeersch; Matthijs Vynck; Peter J Sterk; Herman Van Langenhove; Olivier Thas; Joris Van Cleemput; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Jan P van Meerbeeck
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.