Literature DB >> 26856210

Multivessel vs culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention among patients 65 years or older with acute myocardial infarction.

Tracy Y Wang1, Lisa A McCoy2, Deepak L Bhatt3, Sunil V Rao2, Matthew T Roe2, Frederic S Resnic4, Matthew A Cavender3, John C Messenger5, Eric D Peterson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older adults presenting with acute myocardial infarction (MI) often have multivessel coronary artery disease amenable to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), yet the risks of multivessel intervention may outweigh potential benefits in these patients. We sought to determine if nonculprit intervention during the index PCI is associated with better outcomes among older patients with acute MI and multivessel disease.
METHODS: We examined 19,271 ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) and 31,361 non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients 65years or older with multivessel disease in a linked CathPCI Registry-Medicare database, excluding patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting, left main disease, or cardiogenic shock. Using inverse probability-weighted propensity adjustment, we compared mortality between patients receiving culprit-only vs multivessel intervention during the index PCI procedure.
RESULTS: Most older MI patients (91% STEMI and 74% NSTEMI) received culprit-only intervention during the index PCI. Among STEMI patients, multivessel intervention during the index PCI was associated with higher 30-day mortality (8.3% vs 6.3%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.36, 95% CI 1.14-1.62) than culprit-only intervention, and this trend persisted at 1year (13.8% vs 12.2%, adjusted HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.99-1.31). No significant mortality differences were observed among NSTEMI patients at 30days (3.4% vs 4.1%, adjusted HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.88-1.15) or at 1year (10.1% vs 10.8%, adjusted HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91-1.08).
CONCLUSIONS: Nonculprit intervention during the index PCI was associated with worse outcomes among STEMI patients, but not NSTEMI patients.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26856210     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  7 in total

Review 1.  Complete versus incomplete coronary revascularization: definitions, assessment and outcomes.

Authors:  Prakriti Gaba; Bernard J Gersh; Ziad A Ali; Jeffrey W Moses; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Physiology-guided revascularization versus optimal medical therapy of nonculprit lesions in elderly patients with myocardial infarction: Rationale and design of the FIRE trial.

Authors:  Simone Biscaglia; Vincenzo Guiducci; Andrea Santarelli; Ignacio Amat Santos; Francisco Fernandez-Aviles; Valerio Lanzilotti; Ferdinando Varbella; Luca Fileti; Raul Moreno; Francesco Giannini; Iginio Colaiori; Mila Menozzi; Alfredo Redondo; Marco Ruozzi; Enrique Gutiérrez Ibañes; José Luis Díez Gil; Elisa Maietti; Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai; Javier Escaned; Matteo Tebaldi; Emanuele Barbato; Dariusz Dudek; Antonio Colombo; Gianluca Campo
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Prognostic stratification of older patients with multivessel coronary artery disease treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty based on clinical and biochemical measures: protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ada Del Mar Carmona-Segovia; María Victoria Doncel-Abad; Víctor M Becerra-Muñoz; Jorge Rodríguez-Capitán; Fernando Sabatel-Pérez; María Flores-López; María José Sánchez-Quintero; Dina Medina-Vera; Ana Isabel Molina-Ramos; Rajaa El Bekay; José Miguel Morales-Asencio; María Angullo-Gómez; Luis García-Rodríguez; Lucía Palma-Martí; Francisco Javier Pavón-Morón; Manuel F Jiménez-Navarro
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Comparative Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: An National Cardiovascular Data Registry Research to Practice Project.

Authors:  Eric A Secemsky; Neel Butala; Aishwarya Raja; Rohan Khera; Yongfei Wang; Jeptha P Curtis; Thomas M Maddox; Salim S Virani; Ehrin J Armstrong; Kendrick A Shunk; Ralph G Brindis; Deepak Bhatt; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 7.514

5.  Revascularization Practices and Outcomes in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Who Presented With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock in the US, 2009-2018.

Authors:  Rohan Khera; Eric A Secemsky; Yongfei Wang; Nihar R Desai; Harlan M Krumholz; Thomas M Maddox; Kendrick A Shunk; Salim S Virani; Deepak L Bhatt; Jeptha Curtis; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 44.409

6.  Multivessel Versus Culprit Vessel-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the TRANSLATE-ACS Observational Study.

Authors:  Homam Ibrahim; Praneet K Sharma; David J Cohen; Gregg C Fonarow; Lisa A Kaltenbach; Mark B Effron; Marjorie E Zettler; Eric D Peterson; Tracy Y Wang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Timing and completeness of revascularisation in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jorge Sanz-Sánchez; Giulio G Stefanini
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.994

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.