Literature DB >> 26855824

A Prototype for a Hybrid System to Support Systematic Review Teams: A Case Study of Organ Transplantation.

Tanja Bekhuis1, Eugene Tseytlin2, Kevin J Mitchell2.   

Abstract

We describe a prototype for a hybrid system designed to reduce the number of citations needed to re-screen (NNRS) by systematic reviewers, where citations include titles, abstracts, and metadata. The system obviates the need for screening the entire set of citations a second time, which is typically done to control human error. The reference set is based on a complex review about organ transplantation (N=10,796 citations). Data were split into 50% training and test sets, randomly stratified for percentage eligible citations. The system consists of a rule-based module and a machine-learning (ML) module. The former substantially reduces the number of negative citations passed to the ML module and improves imbalance. Relative to the baseline, the system reduces classification error (5.6% vs 2.9%) thereby reducing NNRS by 47.3% (300 vs 158). We discuss the implications of de-emphasizing sensitivity (recall) in favor of specificity and negative predictive value to reduce screening burden.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26855824      PMCID: PMC4742277          DOI: 10.1109/BIBM.2015.7359810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proceedings (IEEE Int Conf Bioinformatics Biomed)        ISSN: 2156-1125


  8 in total

1.  Towards automating the initial screening phase of a systematic review.

Authors:  Tanja Bekhuis; Dina Demner-Fushman
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2010

2.  Precision of healthcare systematic review searches in a cross-sectional sample.

Authors:  Margaret Sampson; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Christine Urquhart
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.273

Review 3.  The effectiveness of integrated health information technologies across the phases of medication management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  K Ann McKibbon; Cynthia Lokker; Steven M Handler; Lisa R Dolovich; Anne M Holbrook; Daria O'Reilly; Robyn Tamblyn; Brian J Hemens; Runki Basu; Sue Troyan; Pavel S Roshanov
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Screening nonrandomized studies for medical systematic reviews: a comparative study of classifiers.

Authors:  Tanja Bekhuis; Dina Demner-Fushman
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?

Authors:  Hilda Bastian; Paul Glasziou; Iain Chalmers
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 6.  Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches.

Authors:  Alison O'Mara-Eves; James Thomas; John McNaught; Makoto Miwa; Sophia Ananiadou
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-14

7.  Following 411 Cochrane protocols to completion: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Jamie Brehaut; Maggie H Chen; David Moher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Feature engineering and a proposed decision-support system for systematic reviewers of medical evidence.

Authors:  Tanja Bekhuis; Eugene Tseytlin; Kevin J Mitchell; Dina Demner-Fushman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.