Literature DB >> 26855432

The Effects of Forefoot Striking, Increasing Step Rate, and Forward Trunk Lean Running on Trunk and Lower Limb Kinematics and Comfort.

A F Dos Santos1, T H Nakagawa1, G Y Nakashima2, C D Maciel2, F Serrão3.   

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the immediate effects of 3 running technique modifications on the ankle, knee, hip and trunk kinematics and on the perceived comfort in healthy runners. The modifications were: forefoot striking pattern (FFOOT); increasing 10% of step rate (10% SR); and increasing forward trunk lean (FTL). 31 healthy runners participated. 3-dimensional lower limb and trunk kinematics were quantified while performing each condition on a treadmill. At initial contact, the FFOOT showed an increase in plantar flexion and knee external rotation, and reduction in knee flexion and adduction. During the stance phase, this condition showed greater peak knee external rotation and less mean and peak dorsiflexion and knee flexion. The 10% SR resulted in less hip flexion at initial contact. During the stance phase this technique showed less mean and peak knee flexion, peak reduction for dorsiflexion, knee abduction, hip flexion and hip adduction. At initial contact and during the stance phase, the FTL caused greater knee adduction and hip flexion. The usual running was the most comfortable technique. The techniques showed different lower limb kinematic modifications; which could potentially reduce knee injury risk. This knowledge is clinically relevant as it can be used to better prescribe techniques in prevention and rehabilitation programs. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26855432     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  7 in total

1.  Running Footwear and Impact Peak Differences in Recreational Runners.

Authors:  Federico Roggio; Bruno Trovato; Marta Zanghì; Luca Petrigna; Gianluca Testa; Vito Pavone; Giuseppe Musumeci
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-26

2.  Effects of 12-week cadence retraining on impact peak, load rates and lower extremity biomechanics in running.

Authors:  Junqing Wang; Zhen Luo; Boyi Dai; Weijie Fu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  What are the Benefits and Risks Associated with Changing Foot Strike Pattern During Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Injury, Running Economy, and Biomechanics.

Authors:  Laura M Anderson; Daniel R Bonanno; Harvi F Hart; Christian J Barton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Validation of a Video-Based Performance Analysis System (Mediacoach®) to Analyze the Physical Demands during Matches in LaLiga.

Authors:  Jose Luis Felipe; Jorge Garcia-Unanue; David Viejo-Romero; Archit Navandar; Javier Sánchez-Sánchez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  What is the Effect of Changing Running Step Rate on Injury, Performance and Biomechanics? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura M Anderson; Joel F Martin; Christian J Barton; Daniel R Bonanno
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-09-04

6.  Effects of Foot Strike Techniques on Running Biomechanics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yilin Xu; Peng Yuan; Ran Wang; Dan Wang; Jia Liu; Hui Zhou
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.843

7.  Increasing Step Rate Affects Rearfoot Kinematics and Ground Reaction Forces during Running.

Authors:  Kathryn A Farina; Michael E Hahn
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.