Literature DB >> 26855374

Combined exposure to big endothelin-1 and mechanical loading in bovine sternal cores promotes osteogenesis.

Luisa A Meyer1, Michael G Johnson2, Diane M Cullen3, Juan F Vivanco4, Robert D Blank5, Heidi-Lynn Ploeg6, Everett L Smith7.   

Abstract

Increased bone formation resulting from mechanical loading is well documented; however, the interactions of the mechanotransduction pathways are less well understood. Endothelin-1, a ubiquitous autocrine/paracrine signaling molecule promotes osteogenesis in metastatic disease. In the present study, it was hypothesized that exposure to big endothelin-1 (big ET1) and/or mechanical loading would promote osteogenesis in ex vivo trabecular bone cores. In a 2×2 factorial trial of daily mechanical loading (-2000με, 120cycles daily, "jump" waveform) and big ET1 (25ng/mL), 48 bovine sternal trabecular bone cores were maintained in bioreactor chambers for 23days. The bone cores' response to the treatment stimuli was assessed with percent change in core apparent elastic modulus (ΔEapp), static and dynamic histomorphometry, and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) secretion. Two-way ANOVA with a post hoc Fisher's LSD test found no significant treatment effects on ΔEapp (p=0.25 and 0.51 for load and big ET1, respectively). The ΔEapp in the "no load + big ET1" (CE, 13±12.2%, p=0.56), "load + no big ET1" (LC, 17±3.9%, p=0.14) and "load + big ET1" (LE, 19±4.2%, p=0.13) treatment groups were not statistically different than the control group (CC, 3.3%±8.6%). Mineralizing surface (MS/BS), mineral apposition (MAR) and bone formation rates (BFR/BS) were significantly greater in LE than CC (p=0.037, 0.0040 and 0.019, respectively). While the histological bone formation markers in LC trended to be greater than CC (p=0.055, 0.11 and 0.074, respectively) there was no difference between CE and CC (p=0.61, 0.50 and 0.72, respectively). Cores in LE and LC had more than 50% greater MS/BS (p=0.037, p=0.055 respectively) and MAR (p=0.0040, p=0.11 respectively) than CC. The BFR/BS was more than two times greater in LE (p=0.019) and LC (p=0.074) than CC. The PGE2 levels were elevated at 8days post-osteotomy in all groups and the treatment groups remained elevated compared to the CC group on days 15, 19 and 23. The data suggest that combined exposure to big ET1 and mechanical loading results in increased osteogenesis as measured in biomechanical, histomorphometric and biochemical responses.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioreactor; Endothelin; Mechanical loading; Osteogenesis; Trabecular bone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26855374      PMCID: PMC4792706          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  62 in total

1.  Development of a mechanical testing and loading system for trabecular bone studies for long term culture.

Authors:  D B Jones; E Broeckmann; T Pohl; E L Smith
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2003-06-30       Impact factor: 3.942

2.  The Wnt co-receptor LRP5 is essential for skeletal mechanotransduction but not for the anabolic bone response to parathyroid hormone treatment.

Authors:  Kimihiko Sawakami; Alexander G Robling; Minrong Ai; Nathaniel D Pitner; Dawei Liu; Stuart J Warden; Jiliang Li; Peter Maye; David W Rowe; Randall L Duncan; Matthew L Warman; Charles H Turner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Comprehensive skeletal phenotyping and linkage mapping in an intercross of recombinant congenic mouse strains HcB-8 and HcB-23.

Authors:  Neema Saless; Suzanne J Litscher; Meghan J Houlihan; In Kyu Han; Derek Wilson; Peter Demant; Robert D Blank
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 2.481

4.  In situ microdialysis in bone tissue. Stimulation of prostaglandin E2 release by weight-bearing mechanical loading.

Authors:  K Thorsen; A O Kristoffersson; U H Lerner; R P Lorentzon
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Bone biomechanical properties in LRP5 mutant mice.

Authors:  M P Akhter; D J Wells; S J Short; D M Cullen; M L Johnson; G R Haynatzki; P Babij; K M Allen; P J Yaworsky; F Bex; R R Recker
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Role of endothelin-1 in osteoblastic bone metastases.

Authors:  Theresa A Guise; Juan Juan Yin; Khalid S Mohammad
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  A novel peptide vasoconstrictor, endothelin, is produced by vascular endothelium and modulates smooth muscle Ca2+ channels.

Authors:  M Yanagisawa; H Kurihara; S Kimura; K Goto; T Masaki
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1988-12

8.  The influence of mechanical stimulation on osteocyte apoptosis and bone viability in human trabecular bone.

Authors:  V Mann; C Huber; G Kogianni; D Jones; B Noble
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.041

9.  Prostaglandin E2 signals through PTGER2 to regulate sclerostin expression.

Authors:  Damian C Genetos; Clare E Yellowley; Gabriela G Loots
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Regulation of postnatal trabecular bone formation by the osteoblast endothelin A receptor.

Authors:  Gregory A Clines; Khalid S Mohammad; Jessica M Grunda; Katrina L Clines; Maria Niewolna; C Ryan McKenna; Christopher R McKibbin; Masashi Yanagisawa; Larry J Suva; John M Chirgwin; Theresa A Guise
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  4 in total

1.  Endothelin signaling regulates mineralization and posttranscriptionally regulates SOST in TMOb cells via miR 126-3p.

Authors:  Michael G Johnson; Kathryn Konicke; Jasmin Kristianto; Anne Gustavson; Rachel Garbo; Xiaohu Wang; Baozhi Yuan; Robert D Blank
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-02

2.  The -839(A/C) Polymorphism in the ECE1 Isoform b Promoter Associates With Osteoporosis and Fractures.

Authors:  Karen E Hansen; Michael G Johnson; Tonia C Carter; John Mayer; Nicholas S Keuler; Robert D Blank
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2019-07-15

Review 3.  A Comparison of Osteoblast and Osteoclast In Vitro Co-Culture Models and Their Translation for Preclinical Drug Testing Applications.

Authors:  Alexander Sieberath; Elena Della Bella; Ana Marina Ferreira; Piergiorgio Gentile; David Eglin; Kenny Dalgarno
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Ex vivo Bone Models and Their Potential in Preclinical Evaluation.

Authors:  E E A Cramer; K Ito; S Hofmann
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 5.096

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.