Literature DB >> 26855255

Depicting as a method of communication.

Herbert H Clark1.   

Abstract

In everyday discourse, people describe and point at things, but they also depict things with their hands, arms, head, face, eyes, voice, and body, with and without props. Examples are iconic gestures, facial gestures, quotations of many kinds, full-scale demonstrations, and make-believe play. Depicting, it is argued, is a basic method of communication. It is on a par with describing and pointing, but it works by different principles. The proposal here, called staging theory, is that depictions are physical scenes that people stage for others to use in imagining the scenes they are depicting. Staging a scene is the same type of act that is used by children in make-believe play and by the cast and crew in stage plays. This theory accounts for a diverse set of features of everyday depictions. Although depictions are integral parts of everyday utterances, they are absent from standard models of language processing. To be complete, these models will have to account for depicting as well as describing and pointing. (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26855255     DOI: 10.1037/rev0000026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  22 in total

Review 1.  Social play as joint action: A framework to study the evolution of shared intentionality as an interactional achievement.

Authors:  Raphaela Heesen; Emilie Genty; Federico Rossano; Klaus Zuberbühler; Adrian Bangerter
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Linguistic inferences without words.

Authors:  Lyn Tieu; Philippe Schlenker; Emmanuel Chemla
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Gesture as simulated action: Revisiting the framework.

Authors:  Autumn B Hostetter; Martha W Alibali
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

Review 4.  Language is more abstract than you think, or, why aren't languages more iconic?

Authors:  Gary Lupyan; Bodo Winter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Iconicity as Multimodal, Polysemiotic, and Plurifunctional.

Authors:  Gabrielle Hodge; Lindsay Ferrara
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-13

6.  When Gesture "Takes Over": Speech-Embedded Nonverbal Depictions in Multimodal Interaction.

Authors:  Hui-Chieh Hsu; Geert Brône; Kurt Feyaerts
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-11

7.  Rising tones and rustling noises: Metaphors in gestural depictions of sounds.

Authors:  Guillaume Lemaitre; Hugo Scurto; Jules Françoise; Frédéric Bevilacqua; Olivier Houix; Patrick Susini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Demonstration and Pantomime in the Evolution of Teaching.

Authors:  Peter Gärdenfors
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-22

9.  Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction.

Authors:  Lindsay Ferrara; Gabrielle Hodge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-23

10.  Iconicity in Signed and Spoken Vocabulary: A Comparison Between American Sign Language, British Sign Language, English, and Spanish.

Authors:  Marcus Perlman; Hannah Little; Bill Thompson; Robin L Thompson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.