Sandra Jellema1, Rob van der Sande2, Suzanne van Hees3, Jana Zajec3, Esther M Steultjens4, Maria W Nijhuis-van der Sanden5. 1. IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Faculty of Health and Social Studies, Institute of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: sandra.jellema@han.nl. 2. Faculty of Health and Social Studies, Institute of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 4. Faculty of Health and Social Studies, Institute of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 5. IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Faculty of Health and Social Studies, Institute of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate how reengagement in valued activities poststroke is influenced by environmental factors. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched to June 2015 using multiple search terms for stroke, activities, disability, and home and community environments, with the following constraints: English, humans, and adults. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included that contained data on how reengagement in valued activities of community-dwelling stroke survivors was influenced by the environment. Two reviewers independently selected the studies. The search yielded 3726 records; 39 studies were eventually included. DATA EXTRACTION: Findings were extracted from qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-design studies. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality using the Oxford Critical Appraisal Skills Programme lists and independently extracted results. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thematic analysis was conducted on qualitative data, revealing 9 themes related to the iterative nature of the process of reengagement and the associated environmental factors. During the process of reengagement, environmental factors interact with personal and disease-related factors in a gradual process of shaping or abandoning valued activities. The sociocultural context in this case determines what activities are valued and can be resumed by stroke survivors. Social support; activity opportunities and obligations; familiar and accessible environments; resources and reminders; and a step-by-step return facilitate stroke survivors to explore, adapt, resume, and maintain their activities. Social support is helpful at all stages of the process and particularly is important in case stroke survivors are fearful to explore their activity possibilities. The quantitative data identified largely endorsed these findings. No quantitative data were found in respect to the iterative nature of the process, familiar environments, or accessibility. CONCLUSIONS: Reengagement in valued activities is a gradual process. In each stage of the process, several environmental factors play a role. During rehabilitation, professionals should pay attention to the role physical and social environmental factors have in reengagement poststroke and find ways to optimize stroke survivors' environments.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate how reengagement in valued activities poststroke is influenced by environmental factors. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched to June 2015 using multiple search terms for stroke, activities, disability, and home and community environments, with the following constraints: English, humans, and adults. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included that contained data on how reengagement in valued activities of community-dwelling stroke survivors was influenced by the environment. Two reviewers independently selected the studies. The search yielded 3726 records; 39 studies were eventually included. DATA EXTRACTION: Findings were extracted from qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-design studies. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality using the Oxford Critical Appraisal Skills Programme lists and independently extracted results. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thematic analysis was conducted on qualitative data, revealing 9 themes related to the iterative nature of the process of reengagement and the associated environmental factors. During the process of reengagement, environmental factors interact with personal and disease-related factors in a gradual process of shaping or abandoning valued activities. The sociocultural context in this case determines what activities are valued and can be resumed by stroke survivors. Social support; activity opportunities and obligations; familiar and accessible environments; resources and reminders; and a step-by-step return facilitate stroke survivors to explore, adapt, resume, and maintain their activities. Social support is helpful at all stages of the process and particularly is important in case stroke survivors are fearful to explore their activity possibilities. The quantitative data identified largely endorsed these findings. No quantitative data were found in respect to the iterative nature of the process, familiar environments, or accessibility. CONCLUSIONS: Reengagement in valued activities is a gradual process. In each stage of the process, several environmental factors play a role. During rehabilitation, professionals should pay attention to the role physical and social environmental factors have in reengagement poststroke and find ways to optimize stroke survivors' environments.
Authors: Aviva Beit Yosef; Nirit Refaeli; Jeremy M Jacobs; Jeffrey Shames; Yafit Gilboa Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-10 Impact factor: 4.614