Literature DB >> 26854820

Incidence of nonresponse and individual patterns of response following sprint interval training.

Brendon J Gurd1,1, Matthew D Giles1,1, Jacob T Bonafiglia1,1, James P Raleigh1,1, John C Boyd1,1, Jasmin K Ma1,1, Jason G E Zelt1,1, Trisha D Scribbans1,1.   

Abstract

The current study sought to explore the incidence of nonresponders for maximal or submaximal performance following a variety of sprint interval training (SIT) protocols. Data from 63 young adults from 5 previously published studies were utilized in the current analysis. Nonresponders were identified using 2 times the typical error (TE) of measurement for peak oxygen uptake (2 × TE = 1.74 mL/(kg·min)), lactate threshold (2 × TE = 15.7 W), or 500 kcal time-to-completion (TTC; 2 × TE = 306 s) trial. TE was determined on separate groups of participants by calculating the test-retest variance for each outcome. The overall rate of nonresponders for peak oxygen uptake across all participants studied was 22% (14/63) with 4 adverse responders observed. No nonresponders for peak oxygen uptake were observed in studies where participants trained 4 times per week (n = 18), while higher rates were observed in most studies requiring training 3 times per week (30%-50%; n = 45). A nonresponse rate of 44% (8/18) and 50% (11/22) was observed for the TTC test and lactate threshold, respectively. No significant correlations were observed between the changes in peak oxygen uptake and TTC (r = 0.014; p = 0.96) or lactate threshold (r = 0.17; p = 0.44). The current analysis demonstrates a significant incidence of nonresponders for peak oxygen uptake and heterogeneity in the individual patterns of response following SIT. Additionally, these data support the importance of training dose and suggest that the incidence of nonresponse may be mitigated by utilizing the optimal dose of SIT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  V̇O2peak; V̇O2pointe; adverse responder; dose d’exercice; entraînement par intervalle d’intensité élevée (HIIT); erreur typique; exercise dose; high-intensity interval training (HIIT); individual response; lactate threshold; non-répondeur; nonresponder; performance sous-maximale; réponde individuelle; répondeur marginal; seuil de lactate; submaximal performance; time trial; typical error; épreuve contre la montre

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26854820     DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  25 in total

Review 1.  Variability in Individual Response to Aerobic Exercise Interventions Among Older Adults.

Authors:  Mary O Whipple; Erica N Schorr; Kristine M C Talley; Ruth Lindquist; Ulf G Bronas; Diane Treat-Jacobson
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 1.961

2.  Cardiorespiratory coordination reveals training-specific physiological adaptations.

Authors:  S Garcia-Retortillo; M Gacto; T J O'Leary; M Noon; R Hristovski; N Balagué; M G Morris
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Concurrent exercise training: do opposites distract?

Authors:  Vernon G Coffey; John A Hawley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-10-09       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Changes in fat oxidation in response to various regimes of high intensity interval training (HIIT).

Authors:  Todd Anthony Astorino; Matthew M Schubert
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Is a verification phase needed to determine [Formula: see text]O2max across fitness levels?

Authors:  Seth F McCarthy; Jarryd M P Leung; Tom J Hazell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Change in VO2max and time trial performance in response to high-intensity interval training prescribed using ventilatory threshold.

Authors:  Todd A Astorino; Jamie deRevere; Theodore Anderson; Erin Kellogg; Patrick Holstrom; Sebastian Ring; Nicholas Ghaseb
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Cardiorespiratory Adaptations in Elderly Men Following Different Concurrent Training Regimes.

Authors:  E L Cadore; R S Pinto; J L Teodoro; L X N da Silva; E Menger; C L Alberton; G Cunha; M Schumann; M Bottaro; F ZamboM-Ferraresi; M Izquierdo
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.075

8.  Exploring Differences in Cardiorespiratory Fitness Response Rates Across Varying Doses of Exercise Training: A Retrospective Analysis of Eight Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jacob T Bonafiglia; Nicholas Preobrazenski; Hashim Islam; Jeremy J Walsh; Robert Ross; Neil M Johannsen; Corby K Martin; Timothy S Church; Cris A Slentz; Leanna M Ross; William E Kraus; Glen P Kenny; Gary S Goldfield; Denis Prud'homme; Ronald J Sigal; Conrad P Earnest; Brendon J Gurd
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Increased Duration of Exercise Decreases Rate of Nonresponse to Exercise but May Not Decrease Risk for Cancer Mortality.

Authors:  Dan Lin; Melanie Potiaumpai; Kathryn Schmitz; Kathleen Sturgeon
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2021-05-01

10.  Inter-Individual Variability in the Adaptive Responses to Endurance and Sprint Interval Training: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Authors:  Jacob T Bonafiglia; Mario P Rotundo; Jonathan P Whittall; Trisha D Scribbans; Ryan B Graham; Brendon J Gurd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.