Literature DB >> 26854790

Long-term Safety of Living Kidney Donation in an Emerging Economy.

S Adibul Hasan Rizvi1, Mirza Naqi Zafar, Fatema Jawad, Tahir Aziz, Zafar Hussain, Altaf Hashmi, Manzoor Hussain, Fazal Akhtar, Ejaz Ahmed, Rubina Naqvi, S A Anwar Naqvi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term follow-up and management of donors was undertaken in a specialist kidney transplant unit in Pakistan to identify risk and prevent adverse outcomes in living related kidney donors.
METHODS: In an observation cohort study between 1985 and 2012, 3748 donors were offered free medical follow-up and treatment 6 to 12 months after donation and annually thereafter. Each visit included history, physical examination, blood tests for renal, lipid, glucose profiles, and 24-hour urine for proteinuria and creatinine clearance. Preventive intervention was undertaken for new onset clinical conditions. Donor outcomes were compared with 90 nondonor healthy siblings matched for age, sex, and body mass index.
RESULTS: Of the 3748 donors, 2696 (72%) were in regular yearly follow-up for up to 27 years (median, 5.6; interquartile range, 7.9). Eleven (0.4%) died 4 to 22 years after donation with all-cause mortality of 4.0/10 000 person years. Six (0.2%) developed end-stage renal disease 5 to 17 years after donation, (2.7/10 000 person years). Proteinuria greater than 1000 mg/24 hours developed in 28 patients (1%), hypertension in 371 patients (13.7%), and diabetes in 95 patients (3.6%). Therapeutic intervention-controlled protein was less than 1000 mg/24 hours, blood pressure was below 140/90 mm Hg, and glycemic control in 85% up to 15 years after onset. Creatinine clearance fell from 109.8 ± 22.3 mL/min per 1.73 m predonation to 78 ± 17 at 1 year, 84 ± 19 at 5 years, and 70 ± 20 at 25 years. Comparison of 90 nondonor sibling and donor pairs showed significantly higher fasting glucose and hypertension in nondonors.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up of donors has demonstrated end-stage renal disease in 0.6% at 25 years. Regular follow-up identified new onset of disease and allowed interventions that may have prevented adverse outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26854790     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  6 in total

1.  Identifying Outcomes that Are Important to Living Kidney Donors: A Nominal Group Technique Study.

Authors:  Camilla S Hanson; Jeremy R Chapman; John S Gill; John Kanellis; Germaine Wong; Jonathan C Craig; Armando Teixeira-Pinto; Steve J Chadban; Amit X Garg; Angelique F Ralph; Jule Pinter; Joshua R Lewis; Allison Tong
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Renal and cardiac assessment of living kidney donor candidates.

Authors:  Ngan N Lam; Krista L Lentine; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  Current trends in kidney transplantation in India.

Authors:  Sunil Shroff
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

Review 4.  Chronic kidney disease as a cardiovascular risk factor: lessons from kidney donors.

Authors:  Anna M Price; Nicola C Edwards; Manvir K Hayer; William E Moody; Richard P Steeds; Charles J Ferro; Jonathan N Townend
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2018-05-09

Review 5.  Risk for subsequent hypertension and cardiovascular disease after living kidney donation: is it clinically relevant?

Authors:  Charles J Ferro; Jonathan N Townend
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2021-12-13

6.  Increased risk of ischaemic heart disease after kidney donation.

Authors:  Anders J Haugen; Stein Hallan; Nina E Langberg; Dag Olav Dahle; Hege Pihlstrøm; Kåre I Birkeland; Anna V Reisæter; Karsten Midtvedt; Anders Hartmann; Hallvard Holdaas; Geir Mjøen
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 5.992

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.