Antonio J Neri1, Behnoosh R Momin1, Trevor D Thompson1, Jennifer Kahende2, Lei Zhang2, Mary C Puckett1, Sherri L Stewart1. 1. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Comparative effectiveness studies of state tobacco quitlines and Web-based tobacco cessation interventions are limited. In 2009, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention undertook a study of the comparative effectiveness of state quitlines and Web-based tobacco cessation interventions. METHODS: Standardized questionnaires were administered to smokers who enrolled exclusively in either quitlines or Web-based tobacco cessation services in 4 states in 2011-2012. The primary outcome was the 30-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) rate at 7 months both between and within interventions. RESULTS: A total of 4086 participants were included in the analysis. Quitline users were significantly older, more heterogeneous in terms of race and ethnicity, less educated, less likely to be employed, and more often single than Web-based users. The 7-month 30-day PPA rate was 32% for quitline users and 27% for Web-based users. Multivariate models comparing 30-day PPA rates between interventions indicated that significantly increased odds of quitting were associated with being partnered, not living with another smoker, low baseline cigarette use, and more interactions with the intervention. After adjustments for demographic and tobacco use characteristics, quitline users had 1.26 the odds of being abstinent in comparison with Web-based users (95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.58; P = .053). CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the largest comparative effectiveness studies of state tobacco cessation interventions to date. These findings will help public health agencies develop and tailor evidence-based tobacco cessation programs. Further research should focus on users of Web-based cessation interventions sponsored by state health departments and their cost-effectiveness. Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
BACKGROUND: Comparative effectiveness studies of state tobacco quitlines and Web-based tobacco cessation interventions are limited. In 2009, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention undertook a study of the comparative effectiveness of state quitlines and Web-based tobacco cessation interventions. METHODS: Standardized questionnaires were administered to smokers who enrolled exclusively in either quitlines or Web-based tobacco cessation services in 4 states in 2011-2012. The primary outcome was the 30-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) rate at 7 months both between and within interventions. RESULTS: A total of 4086 participants were included in the analysis. Quitline users were significantly older, more heterogeneous in terms of race and ethnicity, less educated, less likely to be employed, and more often single than Web-based users. The 7-month 30-day PPA rate was 32% for quitline users and 27% for Web-based users. Multivariate models comparing 30-day PPA rates between interventions indicated that significantly increased odds of quitting were associated with being partnered, not living with another smoker, low baseline cigarette use, and more interactions with the intervention. After adjustments for demographic and tobacco use characteristics, quitline users had 1.26 the odds of being abstinent in comparison with Web-based users (95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.58; P = .053). CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the largest comparative effectiveness studies of state tobacco cessation interventions to date. These findings will help public health agencies develop and tailor evidence-based tobacco cessation programs. Further research should focus on users of Web-based cessation interventions sponsored by state health departments and their cost-effectiveness. Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Entities:
Keywords:
comparative effectiveness research; health care economics and organizations; intervention studies; social media; tobacco use cessation
Authors: Lawrence C An; Anne Betzner; Barbara Schillo; Michael G Luxenberg; Matthew Christenson; Ann Wendling; Jessie E Saul; Annette Kavanaugh Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2010-08-16 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Paula A Keller; Annamaria Feltracco; Linda A Bailey; Zhanhai Li; Jeff Niederdeppe; Timothy B Baker; Michael C Fiore Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Amanda L Graham; George D Papandonatos; Beth C Bock; Nathan K Cobb; Arielle Baskin-Sommers; Raymond Niaura; David B Abrams Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Michael S Amato; George D Papandonatos; Sarah Cha; Xi Wang; Kang Zhao; Amy M Cohn; Jennifer L Pearson; Amanda L Graham Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Mollie M Mustoe; James M Clark; Timothy T Huynh; Elisa K Tong; Terri P Wolf; Lisa M Brown; David T Cooke Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Madeleine Solenhill; Alessandra Grotta; Elena Pasquali; Linda Bakkman; Rino Bellocco; Ylva Trolle Lagerros Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 5.428