Literature DB >> 26853699

Comparative effects of two different doses of low-level laser therapy on wound healing third-degree burns in rats.

Patricia Brassolatti1, Paulo Sérgio Bossini1, Maria Carolina Derêncio Oliveira2, Hueliton Wilian Kido3, Carla Roberta Tim3, Luciana Almeida-Lopes4, Lucimar Retto Da Silva De Avó5, Fernando M Araújo-Moreira6, Nivaldo Antonio Parizotto1.   

Abstract

Burns are injuries caused by direct or indirect contact to chemical, physical, or biological agents. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a promising treatment since it is low-cost, non-invasive, and induces cell proliferation. This study aimed to investigate the effects of LLLT (660 nm) at two different fluences (12.5 J/cm(2) and 25 J/cm(2) ) per point of application on third-degree burns in rats. Thirty rats (Wistar) divided into GC, GL12.5, and GL25 were used in the study, and submitted to burn injury through a soldering iron at 150°C, pressed on their back for 10 s. LLLT was applied immediately, and 2, 4, 6, and 8 days after wound induction. Histological analysis revealed a decreased inflammatory infiltrate in the group treated with 25 J/cm(2) , and intense inflammatory infiltrate in the control group and in the group treated with 12.5 J/cm(2) . The immunostaining of COX-2 was more intense in the control groups and in the group treated with 12.5 J/cm(2) than in the group treated with 25 J/cm(2) . Conversely, VEGF immunomarking was more expressive in the group treated with 25 J/cm(2) than it was in the other two groups. Therefore, our findings suggest that the use of 25 J/cm(2) and 1 J of energy was more effective in stimulating the cellular processes involved in tissue repair on third-degree burns in rats by reducing the inflammatory phase, and stimulating angiogenesis, thus restoring the local microcirculation which is essential for cell migration.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  burns; low-level laser therapy; wound healing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26853699     DOI: 10.1002/jemt.22632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsc Res Tech        ISSN: 1059-910X            Impact factor:   2.769


  7 in total

1.  Effect of photobiomodulation (670 nm) associated with vitamin A on the inflammatory phase of wound healing.

Authors:  A N Otterço; P Brassolatti; A L M Andrade; L R S Avó; P S Bossini; N A E Parizotto
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  Evaluation of the low-level laser therapy application parameters for skin burn treatment in experimental model: a systematic review.

Authors:  Patricia Brassolatti; Ana Laura Martins de Andrade; Paulo Sérgio Bossini; Albaiza Nicoletti Otterço; Nivaldo Antônio Parizotto
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Photobiomodulation of red and green lights in the repair process of third-degree skin burns.

Authors:  Thamyres Maria Silva Simões; José de Alencar Fernandes Neto; Tharcia Kiara Beserra de Oliveira; Cassiano Francisco Weege Nonaka; Maria Helena Chaves de Vasconcelos Catão
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Treatment in the healing of burns with a cold plasma source.

Authors:  Mario Betancourt-Ángeles; Rosendo Peña-Eguiluz; Régulo López-Callejas; Nicasio Alberto Domínguez-Cadena; Antonio Mercado-Cabrera; Jorge Muñoz-Infante; Benjamín Gonzalo Rodríguez-Méndez; Raúl Valencia-Alvarado; José Alberto Moreno-Tapia
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2017-12-20

5.  Photobiomodulation effect of red LED (630 nm) on the free radical levels produced by pulp cells under stress conditions.

Authors:  Jéssica Fernanda Sena Bonvicini; Fernanda Gonçalves Basso; Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa; Carlos José Soares; Ana Paula Turrioni
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 6.  Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) Applied in Bone Reconstructive Surgery Using Bovine Bone Grafts: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marcelie Priscila de Oliveira Rosso; Daniela Vieira Buchaim; Karina Torres Pomini; Bruna Botteon Della Coletta; Carlos Henrique Bertoni Reis; João Paulo Galletti Pilon; Getúlio Duarte Júnior; Rogério Leone Buchaim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats.

Authors:  Patricia Brassolatti; Paulo Sérgio Bossini; Ana Laura Martins de Andrade; Genoveva Lourdes Flores Luna; Juliana Virginio da Silva; Luciana Almeida-Lopes; Marcos Aurélio Napolitano; Lucimar Retto da Silva de Avó; Ângela Merice de Oliveira Leal; Fernanda de Freitas Anibal
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 1.388

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.