Literature DB >> 26853645

Post-thrombotic syndrome after catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis (CaVenT): 5-year follow-up results of an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Ylva Haig1, Tone Enden1, Ole Grøtta1, Nils-Einar Kløw2, Carl-Erik Slagsvold3, Waleed Ghanima4, Leiv Sandvik5, Geir Hafsahl1, Pål Andre Holme6, Lars Olaf Holmen7, Anne Mette Njaaastad8, Gunnar Sandbæk2, Per Morten Sandset9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post-thrombotic syndrome is a common complication after acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and is associated with reduced quality of life and a substantial cost burden. In the 2-year results of the CaVenT study, additional catheter-directed thrombolysis reduced the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome by 14% compared with conventional therapy, but did not affect quality of life. In this study we report results at the 5-year follow-up, aiming to assess whether findings for post-thrombotic syndrome and quality of life have persisted.
METHODS: Between Jan 3, 2006, and Dec 22, 2009, we recruited patients aged 18-75 years with a first-time high proximal leg DVT from 20 hospitals in the Norwegian southeastern health region. With sealed envelopes, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to standard treatment with compression stockings and anticoagulants (control group) or to standard treatment plus catheter-directed thrombolysis with alteplase within 21 days from symptom onset. Pre-specified outcomes in this analysis were post-thrombotic syndrome at 5 years as assessed with the Villalta score and scores for quality of life at 5 years with EQ-5D and the disease-specific VEINES-QOL/Sym. Analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00251771.
FINDINGS: At 5 year follow-up (last date Oct 14, 2014), data were available for 176 patients (84% of the 209 patients originally randomised)--87 originally assigned to catheter-directed thrombolysis and 89 originally assigned to the control group. 37 patients (43%; 95% CI 33-53) allocated to catheter-directed thrombolysis developed post-thrombotic syndrome, compared with 63 (71%; 95% CI 61-79) allocated to the control group (p<0·0001), corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 28% (95% CI 14-42) and a number needed to treat of 4 (95% CI 2-7). Four (5%) patients assigned to catheter-directed thrombolysis and one (1%) to standard treatment had severe post-thrombotic syndrome (Villalta score ≥ 15 or presence of an ulcer). Quality-of-life scores with either assessment scale did not differ between the treatment groups.
INTERPRETATION: Additional catheter-directed thrombolysis resulted in a persistent and increased clinical benefit during follow-up for up to 5 years, supporting the use of additional catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with extensive proximal DVT. However, allocation to this therapy did not lead to better quality of life. The optimal endovascular thrombolytic approach needs further investigation. FUNDING: Southeastern Norway Regional Health Authority, the Research Council of Norway, University of Oslo, Oslo University Hospital.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26853645     DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00248-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Haematol        ISSN: 2352-3026            Impact factor:   18.959


  63 in total

1.  Venous thromboembolism: 5-year follow-up data from CaVenT.

Authors:  Karina Huynh
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Deep Vein Thrombosis Interventions in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Resmi Ann Charalel; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 3.  Role of venous stenting for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Karen Breen
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2020-12-04

Review 4.  Venous Compression Syndromes: a Review.

Authors:  Sunil Iyer; John F Angle; Andre Uflacker; Aditya M Sharma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-06

5.  The case against catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Jacqueline N Poston; David A Garcia
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-07-24

Review 6.  The case for catheter-directed thrombolysis in selected patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Thita Chiasakul; Adam Cuker
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-07-24

7.  Reduced incidence of vein occlusion and postthrombotic syndrome after immediate compression for deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Elham E Amin; Ingrid M Bistervels; Karina Meijer; Lidwine W Tick; Saskia Middeldorp; Guy Mostard; Marlène van de Poel; Erik H Serné; Hans M Otten; Edith M Klappe; Manuela A Joore; Hugo Ten Cate; Marije Ten Wolde; Arina J Ten Cate-Hoek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Catheter-directed thrombolysis to avoid late consequences of acute deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.944

9.  Gastrointestinal Malignancies and Venous Thromboembolic Disease: Clinical Significance and Endovascular Interventions.

Authors:  Xin Li; Sasan Partovi; Sameer Gadani; Charles Martin; Avi Beck; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Dig Dis Interv       Date:  2020-09-22

10.  Efficacy and Safety of Catheter-directed Thrombolysis in Preventing Post-thrombotic Syndrome: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luai Alhazmi; Abdelmoneim Moustafa; Muhammad A Mangi; Ahmed Alamer; Ehab Eltahawy
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.