Literature DB >> 26853333

Role of Surgical Versus Clinical Staging in Chemoradiated FIGO Stage IIB-IVA Cervical Cancer Patients-Acute Toxicity and Treatment Quality of the Uterus-11 Multicenter Phase III Intergroup Trial of the German Radiation Oncology Group and the Gynecologic Cancer Group.

Simone Marnitz1, Peter Martus2, Christhardt Köhler3, Carmen Stromberger4, Elke Asse5, Peter Mallmann6, Heinz Schmidberger7, Renato José Affonso Júnior8, João Soares Nunes9, Jalid Sehouli10, Volker Budach4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Uterus-11 trial was designed to evaluate the role of surgical staging in patients with cervical cancer before primary chemoradiation therapy (CRT). The present report provides the toxicity data stratified by the treatment arm and technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 255 patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB-IVA) were randomized to either surgical staging followed by CRT (arm A) or clinical staging followed by CRT (arm B). Patients with para-aortic metastases underwent extended field radiation therapy (RT). Brachytherapy was mandatory. The present report presents the acute therapy-related toxicities stratified by treatment arm and radiation technique.
RESULTS: A total of 240 patients were eligible (n=121 in arm A; n=119 in arm B). Of the 240 patients, 236 (98.3%) underwent external beam RT with a median total dose of 50.4 Gy. The mean treatment duration was 53 days. Of the patients, 60% underwent intensity modulated RT (IMRT). A total of 234 patients (97.5%) underwent chemotherapy, and 231 (96.3%) underwent brachytherapy, with a median single dose of 6 Gy covering the tumor to a median nominal total dose of 28 Gy. Treatment was well tolerated, with 0% grade ≥3 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity, 6% grade 3 nausea, 3% grade 3 vomiting, and <2% grade 3 diarrhea. More patients after surgical staging experienced grade 2 anemia (54.3% in arm A vs 45.3% in arm B; P=.074) and grade 2 leukocytopenia (41.4% vs 31.6%; P=.56). Of the patients who received IMRT versus a 3-dimensional technique, 65.3% versus 33.7% presented with grade 2 anemia. Grade 3 gastrointestinal and grade 2 bladder toxicity were significantly reduced with the use of IMRT.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and severity of acute therapy-related toxicity compared favorably with those from other randomized trials. Excellent adherence to treatment and treatment quality was achieved compared with patterns of care analyses. Surgical staging led to a doubled number of patients treated with extended field RT. The question of whether surgical staging is beneficial in the context of primary CRT requires further study.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26853333     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.10.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  8 in total

1.  [Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients-response is not survival].

Authors:  Simone Marnitz; Nadine Gharbi
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Does para-aortic irradiation reduce the risk of distant metastasis in advanced cervical cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Lucas Gomes Sapienza; Maria José Leite Gomes; Vinicius Fernando Calsavara; Mario M Leitao; Glauco Baiocchi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Junzo Chino; Christina M Annunziata; Sushil Beriwal; Lisa Bradfield; Beth A Erickson; Emma C Fields; KathrynJane Fitch; Matthew M Harkenrider; Christine H Holschneider; Mitchell Kamrava; Eric Leung; Lilie L Lin; Jyoti S Mayadev; Marc Morcos; Chika Nwachukwu; Daniel Petereit; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-18

Review 4.  Para-aortic lymph node involvement in cervical cancer: Implications for staging, outcome and treatment.

Authors:  T S Shylasree; Lavanya Gurram; Ushashree Das
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.274

5.  Role of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in abandoned radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Salim Abraham Barquet-Muñoz; Gabriel Jaime Rendón-Pereira; Denise Acuña-González; Monica Vanessa Heymann Peñate; Luis Alonso Herrera-Montalvo; Lenny Nadia Gallardo-Alvarado; David Francisco Cantú-de León; René Pareja
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Surgical or imaging lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ritchie Delara; Jie Yang; Skye Buckner-Petty; Paul Magtibay; Kristina Butler
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Surgical versus clinical staging prior to primary chemoradiation in patients with cervical cancer FIGO stages IIB-IVA: oncologic results of a prospective randomized international multicenter (Uterus-11) intergroup study.

Authors:  Simone Marnitz; Audrey Tieko Tsunoda; Peter Martus; Marcelo Vieira; Renato Jose Affonso Junior; João Nunes; Volker Budach; Hermann Hertel; Alexander Mustea; Jalid Sehouli; Jens-Peter Scharf; Uwe Ulrich; Andreas Ebert; Iris Piwonski; Christhardt Kohler
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 8.  Advances in management of locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hima Bindu Musunuru; Phillip M Pifer; Pranshu Mohindra; Kevin Albuquerque; Sushil Beriwal
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.274

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.