| Literature DB >> 26852670 |
Di-Yan Wang1, Cheng-Hung Li1, Shao-Sian Li2, Tsung-Rong Kuo1, Chin-Ming Tsai1, Tin-Reui Chen1, Ying-Chiao Wang2, Chun-Wei Chen2, Chia-Chun Chen1,3.
Abstract
The design of active and stable semiconducting composites with enhanced photoresponse from visible light to near infrared (NIR) is a key to improve solar energy harvesting for photolysis of water in photoelectrochemical cell. In this study, we prepared earth abundant semiconducting composites consisting of iron pyrite and Titanium oxide as a photoanode (FeS2/TiO2 photoanode) for photoelectrochemical applications. The detailed structure and atomic compositions of FeS2/TiO2 photoanode was characterized by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), inductively coupled plasma with atomic emission spectroscopy (ICPAES) and Raman spectroscopy. Through the proper sulfurization treatment, the FeS2/TiO2 photoanode exhibited high photoresponse from visible light extended to near infrared range (900 nm) as well as stable durability test for 4 hours. We found that the critical factors to enhance the photoresponse are on the elimination of surface defect of FeS2 and on the enhancement of interface charge transfer between FeS2 and TiO2. Our overall results open a route for the design of sulfur-based binary compounds for photoelectrochemical applications.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26852670 PMCID: PMC4745049 DOI: 10.1038/srep20397
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) UV-Vis-NIR absorption spectrum of FeS2 NCs. The inset showed the photograph image of the FeS2 NCs solution. (b) TEM image of FeS2 NCs. The average sizes of the NCs are calculated to be ∼15 nm. The inset showed the x-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the FeS2 NCs.
Figure 2(a) Schematic illustration of the PEC device with a FeS2/TiO2 photoanode, and a passive Pt cathode, for light driven water splitting in aqueous solution. (b) The photocurrent–potential (I–V) responses of FeS2/TiO2 photoanode and pure TiO2 in the alkaline electrolyte (pH = 13.5) with SO32−/S2O32− as sacrificial agent under simulated AM 1.5 illumination (100 mW/cm2). (c) The photocurrent–potential (I–V) responses of FeS2/TiO2, and TiO2 photoanodes in the alkaline electrolyte (pH = 13.5) with SO32−/S2O32− as sacrificial agent under NIR laser (808 nm) illumination (300 mW/cm2). (d) Light chopping photocurrent measurements in a three electrode cell using FeS2/TiO2 photoanode as working electrode.
Figure 3(a) The dependence of photocurrent of the FeS2/TiO2 photoanode operated at a bias of 0.1 V as a function of incident power under excitation with an 808 nm laser. (b) The photoconversion efficiency () curves for the FeS2/TiO2 photoanode.
Figure 4(a) Incident photon to current conversion efficiency of TiO2, CdSe/TiO2, as-grown FeS2/TiO2, FeS2/TiO2 and PbS/TiO2 photoanodes. (b) Stability test of the FeS2/TiO2 photoanode in the alkaline electrolyte (pH = 13.5) with SO32−/S2O32− as sacrificial agent under NIR laser (808 nm) illumination (300 mW/cm2).
Figure 5(a) Raman spectra of as-grown FeS2/TiO2 photoanode and FeS2/TiO2 photoanode. (b) The dark current of TiO2/ as-grown FeS2 and TiO2/FeS2 devices.