Literature DB >> 26852257

Industry view on the relative importance of "clonality" of biopharmaceutical-producing cell lines.

Christopher Frye1, Rohini Deshpande2, Scott Estes3, Kathy Francissen4, John Joly4, Anthony Lubiniecki5, Trent Munro2, Reb Russell6, Tongtong Wang7, Karin Anderson8.   

Abstract

Recently, several health authorities have requested substantial detail from sponsor firms regarding the practices employed to generate the production cell line for recombinant DNA-(rDNA) derived biopharmaceuticals. Two possible inferences from these regulatory agency questions are that (1) assurance of "clonality" of the production cell line is of major importance to assessing the safety and efficacy of the product and (2), without adequate proof of "clonality", additional studies of the cell line and product are often required to further ensure the product's purity and homogeneity. Here we address the topic of "clonality" in the broader context of product quality assurance by current technologies and practices, as well as discuss some of the relevant science and historical perspective. We agree that the clonal derivation of a production cell line is one factor with potential impact, but it is only one of many factors. Further, we believe that regulatory emphasis should be primarily placed on ensuring product quality of the material actually administered to patients, and on ensuring process consistency and implementing appropriate control strategies through the life cycle of the products.
Copyright © 2016 The International Alliance for Biological Standardization. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopharmaceuticals; Chinese hamster ovary cells; Clonality; ICH guidelines; Product control strategy; Production cell line

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26852257     DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2016.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biologicals        ISSN: 1045-1056            Impact factor:   1.856


  12 in total

1.  Recurring genomic structural variation leads to clonal instability and loss of productivity.

Authors:  Arpan A Bandyopadhyay; Sofie A O'Brien; Liang Zhao; Hsu-Yuan Fu; Nandita Vishwanathan; Wei-Shou Hu
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Comprehensive characterization of glutamine synthetase-mediated selection for the establishment of recombinant CHO cells producing monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Soo Min Noh; Seunghyeon Shin; Gyun Min Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Characterization of phenotypic and genotypic diversity in subclones derived from a clonal cell line.

Authors:  Tharmala Tharmalingam; Hedieh Barkhordarian; Nicole Tejeda; Kristi Daris; Sam Yaghmour; Pheng Yam; Fang Lu; Chetan Goudar; Trent Munro; Jennitte Stevens
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2018-05

4.  High throughput, efficacious gene editing & genome surveillance in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  S C Huhn; Y Ou; A Kumar; R Liu; Z Du
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Characterization of CRISPR/Cas9 RANKL knockout mesenchymal stem cell clones based on single-cell printing technology and Emulsion Coupling assay as a low-cellularity workflow for single-cell cloning.

Authors:  Tobias Gross; Csaba Jeney; Darius Halm; Günter Finkenzeller; G Björn Stark; Roland Zengerle; Peter Koltay; Stefan Zimmermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  PTSelect™: A post-transcriptional technology that enables rapid establishment of stable CHO cell lines and surveillance of clonal variation.

Authors:  Vandhana Muralidharan-Chari; Zachary Wurz; Francis Doyle; Matthew Henry; Andreas Diendorfer; Scott A Tenenbaum; Nicole Borth; Edward Eveleth; Susan T Sharfstein
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Directed evolution approach to enhance efficiency and speed of outgrowth during single cell subcloning of Chinese Hamster Ovary cells.

Authors:  Marcus Weinguny; Gerald Klanert; Peter Eisenhut; Andreas Jonsson; Daniel Ivansson; Ann Lövgren; Nicole Borth
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 6.155

8.  Analytical subcloning of a clonal cell line demonstrates cellular heterogeneity that does not impact process consistency or robustness.

Authors:  John J Scarcelli; Megan Hone; Kathryn Beal; Alejaida Ortega; Bruno Figueroa; Jason A Starkey; Karin Anderson
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2018-07-01

Review 9.  Evolution of a comprehensive, orthogonal approach to sequence variant analysis for biotherapeutics.

Authors:  T Jennifer Lin; Kathryn M Beal; Paul W Brown; Heather S DeGruttola; Mellisa Ly; Wenge Wang; Chia H Chu; Robert L Dufield; Gerald F Casperson; James A Carroll; Olga V Friese; Bruno Figueroa; Lisa A Marzilli; Karin Anderson; Jason C Rouse
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.857

10.  Insect High Five™ cell line development using site-specific flipase recombination technology.

Authors:  Mafalda M Dias; João Vidigal; Daniela P Sequeira; Paula M Alves; Ana P Teixeira; António Roldão
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.