| Literature DB >> 26852257 |
Christopher Frye1, Rohini Deshpande2, Scott Estes3, Kathy Francissen4, John Joly4, Anthony Lubiniecki5, Trent Munro2, Reb Russell6, Tongtong Wang7, Karin Anderson8.
Abstract
Recently, several health authorities have requested substantial detail from sponsor firms regarding the practices employed to generate the production cell line for recombinant DNA-(rDNA) derived biopharmaceuticals. Two possible inferences from these regulatory agency questions are that (1) assurance of "clonality" of the production cell line is of major importance to assessing the safety and efficacy of the product and (2), without adequate proof of "clonality", additional studies of the cell line and product are often required to further ensure the product's purity and homogeneity. Here we address the topic of "clonality" in the broader context of product quality assurance by current technologies and practices, as well as discuss some of the relevant science and historical perspective. We agree that the clonal derivation of a production cell line is one factor with potential impact, but it is only one of many factors. Further, we believe that regulatory emphasis should be primarily placed on ensuring product quality of the material actually administered to patients, and on ensuring process consistency and implementing appropriate control strategies through the life cycle of the products.Entities:
Keywords: Biopharmaceuticals; Chinese hamster ovary cells; Clonality; ICH guidelines; Product control strategy; Production cell line
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26852257 DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2016.01.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biologicals ISSN: 1045-1056 Impact factor: 1.856