| Literature DB >> 26852231 |
Sanna Hellberg1, Johanna M U Silvola2, Max Kiugel3, Heidi Liljenbäck4,5, Olli Metsälä6, Tapio Viljanen7, Jari Metso8, Matti Jauhiainen9, Pekka Saukko10, Pirjo Nuutila11,12, Seppo Ylä-Herttuala13,14, Juhani Knuuti15,16, Anne Roivainen17,18,19, Antti Saraste20,21,22.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a risk factor for atherosclerosis associated with oxidative stress, inflammation and cell proliferation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate arterial choline uptake and its relationship to atherosclerotic inflammation in diabetic and non-diabetic hypercholesterolemic mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26852231 PMCID: PMC4744438 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-016-0340-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Characteristics of the study animals
| Tracer | Mouse strain | N of mice (m/f) | Weight (g) | Age (months) | High-fat diet (months) | Injected radioactivity (MBq) | ARG ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18F-FMCH | LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 | 11 (7/4) | 33.2 ± 6.0 | 6.5 ± 0.1 | 4.4 ± 0.0 | 9.4 ± 0.9 | 8 |
| IGF-II/LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 | 11 (6/5) | 32.4 ± 6.8 | 6.4 ± 0.3 | 3.9 ± 0.5 | 10.3 ± 0.6 | 11 | |
| C57BL/6N | 13 (9/4) | 38.2 ± 7.9 | 8.0 ± 2.6 | NA | 11.3 ± 2.2 | 6 | |
| PET/CT IGFII/LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 | 3 (0/3) | 25.0 ± 3.1 | 4.6 ± 0.0 | 2.8 ± 0.0 | 5.7 ± 0.5 | 3 | |
| 18F-FDG | LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 | 12 (8/4) | 35.8 ± 8.8 | 6.6 ± 0.3 | 4.4 ± 0.2 | 11.2 ± 1.8 | 12 |
| IGF-II/LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 | 11 (6/5) | 34.7 ± 7.6 | 6.5 ± 0.4 | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 10.8 ± 1.4 | 11 |
LDLR ApoB non-diabetic atherosclerotic mice, IGF-II/LDLR ApoB diabetic atherosclerotic mice; C57BL/6N healthy control mice; PET/CT positron emission tomography/computed tomography; ARG autoradiography; NA not applicable. The data are expressed as mean ± SD
Fig. 1Histology of atherosclerotic plaques in non-diabetic LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 and diabetic IGF-II/LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 mice. The sections are from aortic roots (scale bar 100 µm) except for Ki-67, which is from aortic arch (scale bar for inset 20 µm). Movat: histology (black = nuclei; yellow = collagen, reticular fibers; blue = ground substance, mucin; red = muscle), Mac-3: macrophages, iNOS: M1 polarized macrophages, MRC-1: M2 polarized macrophages, CD36: macrophage scavenger receptor, Ki-67: proliferative cells
Quantitative results of histology in non-diabetic (LDLR−/−ApoB100/100) and diabetic (IGF-II/LDLR−/−ApoB100/100) atherosclerotic mice
| LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 ( | IGF-II/LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Intima-to-media ratio (plaque size) | 2.7 ± 0.88 | 1.8 ± 0.51 |
| Mac-3 positive area (%) | 15 ± 2.3 | 17 ± 0.98 |
| iNOS positive area (%) | 14 ± 1.3 | 14 ± 1.7 |
| MRC-1 positive area (%) | 30 ± 1.3 | 32 ± 1.2 |
| CD36 positive area (%) | 24 ± 1.6 | 28 ± 0.66 |
In addition to plaque size (intima-to-media ratio), areal percentages of macrophages (Mac-3), M1 polarized macrophages (iNOS), M2 polarized macrophages (MRC-1) and scavenger receptor (CD36) in atherosclerotic lesions in the aortic root are shown. The data are expressed as mean ± SEM. No statistically significant differences were observed between the mouse strains
Fig. 2In vivo and ex vivo PET Imaging. a Whole-body 18F-FMCH PET/CT image of an IGF-II/LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 mouse. b Mean time-activity curves of radioactivity in selected tissues from three mice. c Representative 18F-FMCH PET image of the aorta (left) and heart (right) of atherosclerotic LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 and healthy C57BL/6N mice. High focal uptake can be seen in the aortic arch of the LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 mouse (arrow)
Ex vivo distribution of 18F-FMCH
| LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 | IGF-II/LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 | C57BL/6N | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aorta | 1.5 ± 0.11 | 2.0 ± 0.17a, b | 1.2 ± 0.094 |
| Blood | 0.98 ± 0.076 | 0.58 ± 0.066b | 0.84 ± 0.090 |
| Intestine | 8.1 ± 0.75 | 11 ± 2.0 | 8.7 ± 2.9 |
| Kidney | 49 ± 2.8 | 41 ± 5.1 | 37 ± 3.2 |
| Liver | 19 ± 2.8 | 13 ± 2.0 | 18 ± 2.9 |
| Lungs | 11 ± 0.48 | 13 ± 1.0a | 9.2 ± 0.77 |
| Muscle | 0.91 ± 0.086 | 1.2 ± 0.10 | 0.86 ± 0.12 |
| Myocardium | 6.8 ± 0.44 | 8.4 ± 0.80 | 6.3 ± 0.64 |
| Pancreas | 7.7 ± 0.78 | 8.1 ± 0.86 | 6.0 ± 0.42 |
| Spleen | 6.6 ± 0.30 | 6.7 ± 0.77 | 5.0 ± 0.61 |
| Urine | 20 ± 5.4 | 6.3 ± 2.1 | 15 ± 4.0 |
| White adipose tissue | 0.50 ± 0.12 | 0.51 ± 0.12 | 0.29 ± 0.040 |
The distribution of 18F-FMCH is measured at 20 min post-injection in non-diabetic (LDLR−/−ApoB100/100) and diabetic (IGF-II/LDLR−/−ApoB100/100) atherosclerotic mice and in healthy (C57BL/6N) controls. The results are expressed as percentage of injected radioactivity dose per gram of tissue (mean ± SEM)
aa significant difference as compared with C57BL/6N mice
ba significant difference as compared with LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 mice
Fig. 3Histology and 18F-FMCH and 18F-FDG autoradiography of atherosclerotic aortas in diabetic IGF-II/LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 mice. Scale bar 500 µm. Both tracers show focal uptake in the atherosclerotic plaques (P) in the aortic arch and its branches. W normal vessel wall, A adventitia, C calcification, L lumen
Aortic uptake of 18F-FMCH and 18F-FDG in ex vivo autoradiography
| 18F-FMCH | 18F-FDG | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 | IGF-II/LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 | C57BL/6N | LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 | IGF-II/LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 | |
| Adventitia | 140 ± 9.1 | 160 ± 12 | 100 ± 8.4a | 210 ± 39 | 130 ± 12 |
| Wall | 76 ± 5.8 | 89 ± 6.8 | 69 ± 7.5 | 160 ± 18 | 140 ± 12 |
| Plaque | 190 ± 11 | 240 ± 20a | NA | 320 ± 30 | 290 ± 20 |
| Plaque-to-wall ratio | 2.5 ± 0.10 | 2.6 ± 0.085 | NA | 2.1 ±0.16 | 2.1 ± 0.16 |
| Plaque vs. wall | <0.001 | <0.001 | NA | 0.0023 | <0.001 |
| Plaque vs. adventitia | 0.018 | 0.022 | NA | 0.061 | <0.001 |
Uptake of the tracers in different parts of vascular tissue are measured in non-diabetic (LDLR−/−ApoB100/100) and diabetic (IGF-II/LDLR−/−ApoB100/100) atherosclerotic mice and in healthy (C57BL/6N) controls. The results are expressed as count densities (photo-stimulated luminescence per mm2, mean ± SEM).
NA not applicable
aa significant difference as compared with LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 mice
Fig. 418F-FMCH uptake and the density of macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques in diabetic IGF-II/LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 mice. a Macrophage immunostaining (Mac-3, brown) of aortic plaque. The dotted line separates areas of visually high and low macrophage density. Scale bar 100 µm. b Binary image from ImageJ software shows Mac-3-positive staining as black, and the areal percentage of positive staining is measured. c Autoradiograph of the plaque shows high radioactivity co-localizing with the Mac-3-positive staining. d Quantitative uptake of 18F-FMCH in plaque areas with low, intermediate or high areal percentage of Mac-3-positive staining
Fig. 5Correlation of 18F-FMCH uptake and plasma levels of lipids, metabolic markers and cytokines. Pooled data from non-diabetic LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 and diabetic IGF-II/LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 mice. PLTP phospholipid transfer protein; PON-1 paraoxonase-1; IL-6 interleukin-6; RANTES cytokine regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted
Fig. 6Comparison of 18F-FMCH and 18F-FDG target-to-background ratios in non-diabetic LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 and diabetic IGF-II/LDLR−/−ApoB100/100 atherosclerotic mice. The plaque-to-wall uptake ratio measured from autoradiography is higher with 18F-FMCH as compared with 18F-FDG in diabetic mice. The 18F-FMCH aorta-to-blood ratio measured ex vivo by gamma counting is lower as compared with 18F-FDG in non-diabetic mice. 18F-FMCH shows a significantly higher aorta-to-myocardium ratio in both mouse strains