Literature DB >> 26852101

Effect of surface potential on epithelial cell adhesion, proliferation and morphology.

Hsun-Yun Chang1, Wei-Lun Kao2, Yun-Wen You3, Yi-Hsuan Chu2, Kuo-Jui Chu2, Peng-Jen Chen3, Chen-Yi Wu2, Yu-Hsuan Lee3, Jing-Jong Shyue4.   

Abstract

Cell adhesion is the basis of individual cell survival, division and motility. Hence, understanding the effects that the surface properties have on cell adhesion, proliferation and morphology are crucial. In particular, surface charge/potential has been identified as an important factor that affects cell behavior. However, how cells respond to incremental changes in surface potential remains unclear. By using binary self-assembled monolayer (SAM) modified Au surfaces that are similar in mechanical/chemical properties and provide a series of surface potentials, the effect of surface potential on the behavior of cells can be studied. In this work, the effect of surface potential on epithelial cells, including human embryonic kidney (HEK293T) and human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2), were examined. The results showed that the adhesion density of epithelial cells increased with increasing surface potential, which is similar to but varied more significantly compared with fibroblasts. The proliferation rate is found to be independent of surface potential in both cell types. Furthermore, epithelial cells show no morphological change with respect to surface potential, whereas the morphology of the fibroblasts clearly changed with the surface potential. These differences between the cell types were rationalized by considering the difference in extracellular matrix composition. Laminin-dominant epithelial cells showed higher adhesion density and less morphological change than did fibronectin-dominant fibroblasts because the more significant adsorption of positively charged laminin on the surface enhanced the adhesion of epithelial cells. In contrast, due to the dominance of negatively charged fibronectin that adsorbed weakly on the surface, fibroblasts had to change their morphology to fit the inhomogeneous fibronectin-adsorbed area.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell adhesion; Epithelial cell; Self-assembled monolayer (SAM); Surface potential

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26852101     DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.01.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces        ISSN: 0927-7765            Impact factor:   5.268


  5 in total

Review 1.  Augmenting endogenous repair of soft tissues with nanofibre scaffolds.

Authors:  Mathew Baldwin; Sarah Snelling; Stephanie Dakin; Andrew Carr
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Tuning Cell Behavior on 3D Scaffolds Fabricated by Atmospheric Plasma-Assisted Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Maria Cámara-Torres; Ravi Sinha; Paolo Scopece; Thomas Neubert; Kristina Lachmann; Alessandro Patelli; Carlos Mota; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 3.  Electrical Stimulation Enabled via Electrospun Piezoelectric Polymeric Nanofibers for Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Guangbo Xia; Beibei Song; Jian Fang
Journal:  Research (Wash D C)       Date:  2022-08-02

4.  Influence of P(VDF-TrFE) Membranes with Different Surface Potentials on the Activity and Angiogenic Function of Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Mingwei Cheng; Peijun Zhu; Shuo Yang; Chunhua Lai; Shulan Xu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Poly(amidoamine)-alginate hydrogels: directing the behavior of mesenchymal stem cells with charged hydrogel surfaces.

Authors:  André Schulz; Alisa Katsen-Globa; Esther J Huber; Sabine C Mueller; Asger Kreiner; Norbert Pütz; Michael M Gepp; Benjamin Fischer; Frank Stracke; Hagen von Briesen; Julia C Neubauer; Heiko Zimmermann
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 3.896

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.