Literature DB >> 26852066

Familial dilated cardiomyopathy diagnosis is commonly overlooked at the time of transplant listing.

Sara B Seidelmann1, Olga Laur2, John Hwa2, Eugene Depasquale2, Lavanya Bellumkonda2, Lissa Sugeng2, Pawel Pomianowski2, Jeffrey Testani3, Michael Chen2, William McKenna4, Daniel Jacoby5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and clinical characteristics of familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDCM) among patients with end stage heart failure (ESHF) has yet to be elucidated. We sought to determine the prevalence of FDCM in ESHF in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry and compare this with center specific data from a large tertiary teaching hospital. Patients with a banked UNOS diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) whose care originated at our center then underwent detailed pedigree analysis in order to determine the true prevalence of FDCM. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 16,091 patients with DCM from all centers were identified in the UNOS registry of whom 492 carried the diagnosis of FDCM (3.1%). Patients with the diagnosis of FDCM tended to be younger (42 versus 49 years old in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM), p=0.001), were less likely to have diabetes (7.8% versus 16.5% in IDCM, p<0.0001), had slightly lower creatinine (1.2 versus 1.4 in IDCM, p=0.0001) and were more likely to have a panel reactive antibody level ≥ 20% (62.1% versus 44.7% in IDCM, p<0.0001). Consecutive living adult patients with ESHF were identified from the UNOS registry that had been treated at the Yale Center for Advanced Heart Failure (YCAHF). After excluding all diagnoses that did not include any form of non-ischemic DCM, 73 patients met the inclusion criteria. Center-specific UNOS data showed pre-pedigree analysis diagnosis of FDCM in 4.12% of patients (3 out of 73), consistent with that found in the UNOS database for all centers. However, after detailed family history and pedigree analysis, 19 (26%) of 73 patients were found to have FDCM, while the remaining 54 were found to have IDCM. Echocardiographic findings including mitral regurgitation, mitral valve annulus and left ventricular end diastolic dimension were not significantly different between groups when adjusting for multiple testing.
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of FDCM was missed in the majority of patients with end stage heart failure enrolled in the UNOS database, as sampled from a large, tertiary care teaching hospital in the United States. Echocardiographic findings are unlikely to aid in the differentiation between DCM and FDCM. Detailed pedigree analysis can successfully identify undiagnosed FDCM and should be encouraged prior to transplant listing as it has important implications for early detection and treatment of disease in family members.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiomyopathy; end-stage heart failure; familial dilated cardiomyopathy; pedigree analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26852066      PMCID: PMC5423783          DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  13 in total

1.  Progression of familial and non-familial dilated cardiomyopathy: long term follow up.

Authors:  V V Michels; D J Driscoll; F A Miller; T M Olson; E J Atkinson; C L Olswold; D J Schaid
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Update 2011: clinical and genetic issues in familial dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ray E Hershberger; Jill D Siegfried
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  The frequency of familial dilated cardiomyopathy in a series of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  V V Michels; P P Moll; F A Miller; A J Tajik; J S Chu; D J Driscoll; J C Burnett; R J Rodeheffer; J H Chesebro; H D Tazelaar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-01-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Clinical characteristics of 304 kindreds evaluated for familial dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Jessica D Kushner; Deirdre Nauman; Donna Burgess; Susan Ludwigsen; Sharie B Parks; George Pantely; Emily Burkett; Ray E Hershberger
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.712

5.  Desmosomal protein gene mutations in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy undergoing cardiac transplantation: a clinicopathological study.

Authors:  Pablo Garcia-Pavia; Petros Syrris; Clara Salas; Alison Evans; Jesus G Mirelis; Marta Cobo-Marcos; Carlos Vilches; Belen Bornstein; Javier Segovia; Luis Alonso-Pulpon; Perry M Elliott
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Clinical profiles of four large pedigrees with familial dilated cardiomyopathy: preliminary recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  K A Crispell; A Wray; H Ni; D J Nauman; R E Hershberger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Familial dilated cardiomyopathy: cardiac abnormalities are common in asymptomatic relatives and may represent early disease.

Authors:  M K Baig; J H Goldman; A L Caforio; A S Coonar; P J Keeling; W J McKenna
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Frequency and phenotypes of familial dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  E Grünig; J A Tasman; H Kücherer; W Franz; W Kübler; H A Katus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  [Familial dilated cardiomyopathy in patients transplanted for idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy].

Authors:  Lorenzo Monserrat; Manuel Hermida; Beatriz Bouzas; Ignacio Mosquera; Niall Mahon; Jesús Peteiro; Nemesio Alvarez; Manuel Penas-Lado; Marisa Crespo; Alfonso Castro-Beiras
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.753

10.  Familial dilated cardiomyopathy in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  P J Keeling; Y Gang; G Smith; H Seo; S E Bent; V Murday; A L Caforio; W J McKenna
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-05
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Should Primary Prevention ICDs Still Be Placed in Patients with Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy? A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Harsha V Ganga; Abhishek Maan; E Kevin Heist
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Epidemiology of the inherited cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  William J McKenna; Daniel P Judge
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  A Genome-Wide Association Study of Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy in African Americans.

Authors:  Huichun Xu; Gerald W Dorn; Amol Shetty; Ankita Parihar; Tushar Dave; Shawn W Robinson; Stephen S Gottlieb; Mark P Donahue; Gordon F Tomaselli; William E Kraus; Braxton D Mitchell; Stephen B Liggett
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2018-02-26

Review 4.  Importance of Genetic Testing in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Applications and Challenges in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Arsonval Lamounier Júnior; Filipe Ferrari; Renato Max; Luiz Eduardo Fonteles Ritt; Ricardo Stein
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Contemporary characteristics and outcomes of adults with familial dilated cardiomyopathy listed for heart transplantation.

Authors:  Mohamed Khayata; Sadeer G Al-Kindi; Guilherme H Oliveira
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-26

Review 6.  Sex-Related Differences in Genetic Cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Alessia Argirò; Carolyn Ho; Sharlene M Day; Jolanda van der Velden; Elisabetta Cerbai; Sara Saberi; Jil C Tardiff; Neal K Lakdawala; Iacopo Olivotto
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 6.106

7.  Diagnostic yield of genetic testing in heart transplant recipients with prior cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Hanne M Boen; Bart L Loeys; Maaike Alaerts; Johan B Saenen; Inge Goovaerts; Lut Van Laer; Anne Vorlat; Tom Vermeulen; Constantijn Franssen; Patrick Pauwels; Inez Rodrigus; Hein Heidbuchel; Emeline M Van Craenenbroeck
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 13.569

Review 8.  Sex Differences, Genetic and Environmental Influences on Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Angita Jain; Nadine Norton; Katelyn A Bruno; Leslie T Cooper; Paldeep S Atwal; DeLisa Fairweather
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.