Literature DB >> 26851316

Virtual Surgical Planning in Precise Maxillary Reconstruction With Vascularized Fibular Graft After Tumor Ablation.

You-Yuan Wang1, Song Fan2, Han-Qing Zhang3, Zhao-Yu Lin3, Jian-Tao Ye4, Jin-Song Li5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Reconstruction of maxillary and midfacial defects due to tumor ablation is challenging to conventional operation. The purposes of this study are to evaluate the precise 3-dimensional position of the fibular flap in reconstruction of maxillary defects assisted by virtual surgical planning and to assess the postoperative outcomes compared with conventional surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 18 consecutive patients who underwent maxillary reconstruction with a vascularized fibular flap assisted by virtual surgical planning after maxillary or midfacial tumor ablation. Conventional surgery was performed in another 15 patients. Proplan CMF surgical planning (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) was performed preoperatively in the virtual planning group. Fibular flaps were harvested and underwent osteotomy assisted by prefabricated cutting guides, and the maxilla and midface were resected and reconstructed assisted by the prefabricated cutting guides and templates in the virtual planning group. The operative time and fibular flap positions were evaluated in the 2 groups. Postoperative fibular positions of the maxillary reconstruction were compared with virtual plans in the virtual planning group. The postoperative facial appearance and occlusal function were assessed.
RESULTS: The operations were performed successfully without complications. The ischemia time and total operative time were shorter in the virtual planning group than those in the conventional surgery group (P < .05). High precision of the cutting guides and templates was found on both the fibula and maxilla in the virtual planning group. The positions of the fibular flaps, including the vertical and horizontal positions, were more accurate in the virtual planning group than those in the conventional surgery group (P < .05). Bone-to-bone contact between the maxilla and fibular segments was more precise in the virtual planning group (P < .05). Postoperative computed tomography scans showed excellent contour of the fibular flap segments in accordance with the virtual plans in the virtual planning group. All patients were alive with no evidence of disease. Functional mandibular range of motion, good occlusion, and an ideal facial appearance were observed in the virtual planning group.
CONCLUSIONS: Virtual surgical planning appears to achieve precise maxillary reconstruction with a vascularized fibular flap after tumor ablation, as well as an ideal facial appearance and function after dental rehabilitation. The use of prefabricated cutting guides and plates eases fibular flap molding and placement, minimizes operating time, and improves clinical outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26851316     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  10 in total

1.  Virtual Surgical Planning and Hardware Fabrication Prior to Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Atrophic Edentulous Mandible Fractures.

Authors:  Karl Daniel Maloney; Torin Rutner
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2019-02-08

2.  Aesthetic reconstruction of onco-surgical maxillary defects using free scapular flap with and without CAD/CAM customized osteotomy guide.

Authors:  Mohamed Salah Alwadeai; Leena Ali Al-Aroomy; Mostafa Ibrahim Shindy; Ayman Abdel-Wahab Amin; Mohamed Hamdallah Zedan
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.030

3.  Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol.

Authors:  Jens H Højvig; Nicolas J Pedersen; Birgitte W Charabi; Irene Wessel; Lisa T Jensen; Jan Nyberg; Nana Mayman-Holler; Henrik Kehlet; Christian T Bonde
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2020-10-15

4.  Virtual Surgical Planning in Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Suraj Jaisinghani; Nicholas S Adams; Robert J Mann; John W Polley; John A Girotto
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2017-01-09

5.  Intraoperative Change in Defect Size during Maxillary Reconstruction Using Surgical Guides Created by CAD/CAM.

Authors:  Daiki Morita; Toshiaki Numajiri; Hiroko Nakamura; Shoko Tsujiko; Yoshihiro Sowa; Makoto Yasuda; Shigeru Hirano
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-04-20

6.  Fibular osteofasciocutaneous flap in computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction: technical aspects in oral malignancies.

Authors:  M Berrone; E Crosetti; P L Tos; M Pentenero; G Succo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  The use of virtual surgical planning and navigation in the treatment of orbital trauma.

Authors:  Alan Scott Herford; Meagan Miller; Floriana Lauritano; Gabriele Cervino; Fabrizio Signorino; Carlo Maiorana
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-21

8.  Maxillary reconstruction using rectus femoris muscle flap and sagittal mandibular ramus/coronoid process graft pedicled with temporalis muscle.

Authors:  W Wang; B Xu; J Zhu; C Yang; S Shen; Y Qian
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-09-01

9.  Orthodontics First in Hemimandibular Hyperplasia. "Mind the Gap".

Authors:  Stefania Perrotta; Giorgio Lo Giudice; Tecla Bocchino; Luigi Califano; Rosa Valletta
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Surgery in Maxillary Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gustaaf J C van Baar; Kitty Schipper; Tymour Forouzanfar; Lars Leeuwrik; Henri A H Winters; Angela Ridwan-Pramana; Frank K J Leusink
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.