PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of patients affected by unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with radiotherapy (ERT) and concurrent gemcitabine-based chemotherapy with or without intraluminal brachytherapy (BT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients underwent weekly gemcitabine (100 mg/m(2)) as a 24-h infusion during the course of three-dimensional radiotherapy (50.4 Gy to the tumor and 39.6 Gy to the nodes). Among them, certain patients received a boost of intraluminal high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with 192 Ir. The outcome of patients was evaluated in terms of response to therapy, local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 27 patients with the diagnosis of unresectable, non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the extrahepatic biliary ducts, treated with radiochemotherapy with gemcitabine. After a dose of 50 Gy, a boost of HDR intraluminal brachytherapy was administered in 6 patients (22%): 4 patients received 15 Gy and 2 patients 20 Gy. With a median follow-up of 16 months (range=3-52 months), for the entire group, 2-year LC was 29% (median=12 months), 2-year MFS was 36% (median 16 months). Two-year and three-year OS were 27% and 7% respectively, with a median of 14 months. Toxicities were acceptable. Median OS in patients treated with brachytherapy boost was 21 months versus 14 months for the group treated with gemcitabine-based radiochemotherapy only; 2-year LC was 53% versus 25%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine appears to be a potent radiation sensitizer, and when combined with radiation therapy, it shows encouraging tumor response. Moreover, patients treated with a boost of brachytherapy after radiochemotherapy seem to have a better local control with an acceptable toxicity. Further investigation is warranted to confirm these data and define the optimal combined treatments. Copyright
PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of patients affected by unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with radiotherapy (ERT) and concurrent gemcitabine-based chemotherapy with or without intraluminal brachytherapy (BT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients underwent weekly gemcitabine (100 mg/m(2)) as a 24-h infusion during the course of three-dimensional radiotherapy (50.4 Gy to the tumor and 39.6 Gy to the nodes). Among them, certain patients received a boost of intraluminal high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with 192 Ir. The outcome of patients was evaluated in terms of response to therapy, local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 27 patients with the diagnosis of unresectable, non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the extrahepatic biliary ducts, treated with radiochemotherapy with gemcitabine. After a dose of 50 Gy, a boost of HDR intraluminal brachytherapy was administered in 6 patients (22%): 4 patients received 15 Gy and 2 patients 20 Gy. With a median follow-up of 16 months (range=3-52 months), for the entire group, 2-year LC was 29% (median=12 months), 2-year MFS was 36% (median 16 months). Two-year and three-year OS were 27% and 7% respectively, with a median of 14 months. Toxicities were acceptable. Median OS in patients treated with brachytherapy boost was 21 months versus 14 months for the group treated with gemcitabine-based radiochemotherapy only; 2-year LC was 53% versus 25%, respectively. CONCLUSION:Gemcitabine appears to be a potent radiation sensitizer, and when combined with radiation therapy, it shows encouraging tumor response. Moreover, patients treated with a boost of brachytherapy after radiochemotherapy seem to have a better local control with an acceptable toxicity. Further investigation is warranted to confirm these data and define the optimal combined treatments. Copyright
Authors: Suguru Yamashita; Michael J Overman; Huamin Wang; Jun Zhao; Masayuki Okuno; Claire Goumard; Ching-Wei Tzeng; Michael Kim; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Matthew H Katz; Jeffrey E Lee; Claudius Conrad Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Krishan R Jethwa; Shilpa Sannapaneni; Trey C Mullikin; William S Harmsen; Molly M Petersen; Phanindra Antharam; Brady Laughlin; Amit Mahipal; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Kenneth W Merrell; Michelle Neben-Wittich; Terence T Sio; Michael G Haddock; Christopher L Hallemeier Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2020-12
Authors: Erqi L Pollom; Muthuraman Alagappan; Lesley S Park; Alice S Whittemore; Albert C Koong; Daniel T Chang Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 4.452