Kyle W Carter1, Steven L Moulton2. 1. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, 13123 E 16th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, United States. Electronic address: kyle.carter@ucdenver.edu. 2. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, 13123 E 16th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, United States. Electronic address: steven.moulton@childrenscolorado.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Falling from a low height is the most common history given by caregivers of pediatric nonaccidental trauma (NAT) victims evaluated for blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). The purpose of this study is to compare the patterns of injuries seen in children with BAT who are victims of NAT with those seen after a fall-related incident. METHODS: Trauma database query from regional pediatric trauma centers identified patients were who were evaluated for BAT resulting from either NAT or a fall. Study groups included patients younger than five years who were (1) victims or NAT, or (2) fall casualties. RESULTS: Sixty-five NATs and 115 fall casualties were identified. NAT victims had higher ISS, had more severe head injuries according to AIS scores, had more hollow viscus injuries, and had more pancreatic injuries. Fall casualties were more likely to have solid organ injuries. CONCLUSIONS: When evaluating children with a history of blunt abdominal trauma caused by a fall, suspicion for NAT is warranted if the child is younger than five years, has a hollow viscus, pancreatic, and/or severe head injury and has a high ISS. Likewise, isolated splenic or renal injury allays suspicion for NAT.
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Falling from a low height is the most common history given by caregivers of pediatric nonaccidental trauma (NAT) victims evaluated for blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). The purpose of this study is to compare the patterns of injuries seen in children with BAT who are victims of NAT with those seen after a fall-related incident. METHODS:Trauma database query from regional pediatric trauma centers identified patients were who were evaluated for BAT resulting from either NAT or a fall. Study groups included patients younger than five years who were (1) victims or NAT, or (2) fall casualties. RESULTS: Sixty-five NATs and 115 fall casualties were identified. NAT victims had higher ISS, had more severe head injuries according to AIS scores, had more hollow viscus injuries, and had more pancreatic injuries. Fall casualties were more likely to have solid organ injuries. CONCLUSIONS: When evaluating children with a history of blunt abdominal trauma caused by a fall, suspicion for NAT is warranted if the child is younger than five years, has a hollow viscus, pancreatic, and/or severe head injury and has a high ISS. Likewise, isolated splenic or renal injury allays suspicion for NAT.
Authors: Micah G Katz; Stephen J Fenton; Kathryn W Russell; Eric R Scaife; Scott S Short Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Ashley P Marek; Rachel M Nygaard; Ellie M Cohen; Stephanie F Polites; Anne-Marie E Sirany; Sarah E Wildenberg; Terri A Elsbernd; Sherrie Murphy; D Dean Potter; Martin D Zielinski; Chad J Richardson Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2018-07-28