Literature DB >> 26849955

The numerical analysis of non-Newtonian blood flow in human patient-specific left ventricle.

Siamak N Doost1, Liang Zhong2, Boyang Su3, Yosry S Morsi4.   

Abstract

Recently, various non-invasive tools such as the magnetic resonance image (MRI), ultrasound imaging (USI), computed tomography (CT), and the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) have been widely utilized to enhance our current understanding of the physiological parameters that affect the initiation and the progression of the cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) associated with heart failure (HF). In particular, the hemodynamics of left ventricle (LV) has attracted the attention of the researchers due to its significant role in the heart functionality. In this study, CFD owing its capability of predicting detailed flow field was adopted to model the blood flow in images-based patient-specific LV over cardiac cycle. In most published studies, the blood is modeled as Newtonian that is not entirely accurate as the blood viscosity varies with the shear rate in non-linear manner. In this paper, we studied the effect of Newtonian assumption on the degree of accuracy of intraventricular hemodynamics. In doing so, various non-Newtonian models and Newtonian model are used in the analysis of the intraventricular flow and the viscosity of the blood. Initially, we used the cardiac MRI images to reconstruct the time-resolved geometry of the patient-specific LV. After the unstructured mesh generation, the simulations were conducted in the CFD commercial solver FLUENT to analyze the intraventricular hemodynamic parameters. The findings indicate that the Newtonian assumption cannot adequately simulate the flow dynamic within the LV over the cardiac cycle, which can be attributed to the pulsatile and recirculation nature of the flow and the low blood shear rate.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational fluid dynamics; Fluid–structure interaction; Hemodynamics; Left ventricle; Non-Newtonian; Shear rates

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26849955     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  12 in total

1.  Modeling Left Ventricular Blood Flow Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics.

Authors:  Andrés Caballero; Wenbin Mao; Liang Liang; John Oshinski; Charles Primiano; Raymond McKay; Susheel Kodali; Wei Sun
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.495

2.  Non-Newtonian blood rheology impacts left atrial stasis in patient-specific simulations.

Authors:  Alejandro Gonzalo; Manuel García-Villalba; Lorenzo Rossini; Eduardo Durán; Davis Vigneault; Pablo Martínez-Legazpi; Oscar Flores; Javier Bermejo; Elliot McVeigh; Andrew M Kahn; Juan C Del Alamo
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.648

Review 3.  Simulation of Mechanical Heart Valve Dysfunction and the Non-Newtonian Blood Model Approach.

Authors:  Aolin Chen; Adi Azriff Bin Basri; Norzian Bin Ismail; Masaaki Tamagawa; Di Zhu; Kamarul Arifin Ahmad
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Non-Newtonian Effects on Patient-Specific Modeling of Fontan Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Zhenglun Wei; Shelly Singh-Gryzbon; Phillip M Trusty; Connor Huddleston; Yingnan Zhang; Mark A Fogel; Alessandro Veneziani; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Computational investigation of left ventricular hemodynamics following bioprosthetic aortic and mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  Fei Xu; Emily L Johnson; Chenglong Wang; Arian Jafari; Cheng-Hau Yang; Michael S Sacks; Adarsh Krishnamurthy; Ming-Chen Hsu
Journal:  Mech Res Commun       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.254

6.  Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software.

Authors:  Johannes Töger; Per M Arvidsson; Jelena Bock; Mikael Kanski; Gianni Pedrizzetti; Marcus Carlsson; Håkan Arheden; Einar Heiberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Heart blood flow simulation: a perspective review.

Authors:  Siamak N Doost; Dhanjoo Ghista; Boyang Su; Liang Zhong; Yosry S Morsi
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Left Ventricular Trabeculations Decrease the Wall Shear Stress and Increase the Intra-Ventricular Pressure Drop in CFD Simulations.

Authors:  Federica Sacco; Bruno Paun; Oriol Lehmkuhl; Tinen L Iles; Paul A Iaizzo; Guillaume Houzeaux; Mariano Vázquez; Constantine Butakoff; Jazmin Aguado-Sierra
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Impact of Aortoseptal Angle Abnormalities and Discrete Subaortic Stenosis on Left-Ventricular Outflow Tract Hemodynamics: Preliminary Computational Assessment.

Authors:  Jason A Shar; Kathleen N Brown; Sundeep G Keswani; Jane Grande-Allen; Philippe Sucosky
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-02-27

10.  Hemodynamic Analysis of VenaTech Convertible Vena Cava Filter Using Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Authors:  Jingying Wang; Wen Huang; Yue Zhou; Fangzhou Han; Dong Ke; Chunhian Lee
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.