Literature DB >> 26849620

Heterogeneous Preference and Local Nonlinearity in Consensus Decision Making.

Andrew T Hartnett1,2, Emmanuel Schertzer3,4, Simon A Levin2, Iain D Couzin2,5,6.   

Abstract

In recent years, a large body of research has focused on unveiling the fundamental physical processes that living systems utilize to perform functions, such as coordinated action and collective decision making. Here, we demonstrate that important features of collective decision making among higher organisms are captured effectively by a novel formulation of well-characterized physical spin systems, where the spin state is equivalent to two opposing preferences, and a bias in the preferred state represents the strength of individual opinions. We reveal that individuals (spins) without a preference (unbiased or uninformed) play a central role in collective decision making, both in maximizing the ability of the system to achieve consensus (via enhancement of the propagation of spin states) and in minimizing the time taken to do so (via a process reminiscent of stochastic resonance). Which state (option) is selected collectively, however, is shown to depend strongly on the nonlinearity of local interactions. Relatively linear social response results in unbiased individuals reinforcing the majority preference, even in the face of a strongly biased numerical minority (thus promoting democratic outcomes). If interactions are highly nonlinear, however, unbiased individuals exert the opposite influence, promoting a strongly biased minority and inhibiting majority preference. These results enhance our understanding of physical computation in biological collectives and suggest new avenues to explore in the collective dynamics of spin systems.

Year:  2016        PMID: 26849620     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.038701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev Lett        ISSN: 0031-9007            Impact factor:   9.161


  5 in total

1.  Heterogeneity Improves Speed and Accuracy in Social Networks.

Authors:  Bhargav Karamched; Megan Stickler; William Ott; Benjamin Lindner; Zachary P Kilpatrick; Krešimir Josić
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 9.185

2.  Collective decision-making by rational agents with differing preferences.

Authors:  Richard P Mann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Avoiding costly mistakes in groups: The evolution of error management in collective decision making.

Authors:  Alan N Tump; Max Wolf; Pawel Romanczuk; Ralf H J M Kurvers
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 4.  Collective animal navigation and migratory culture: from theoretical models to empirical evidence.

Authors:  Andrew M Berdahl; Albert B Kao; Andrea Flack; Peter A H Westley; Edward A Codling; Iain D Couzin; Anthony I Dell; Dora Biro
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Group-based rewiring rules of binary opinion competition dynamics.

Authors:  Cheng Jin; Chunji Yin; Xiaogang Jin; Yong Min; Yixiao Li; Nuole Chen; Jiaxuan Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.