Literature DB >> 26849405

Inter-Relationship between Low-Dose Hyper-Radiosensitivity and Radiation-Induced Bystander Effects in the Human T98G Glioma and the Epithelial HaCaT Cell Line.

Cristian Fernandez-Palomo1, Colin Seymour1, Carmel Mothersill1.   

Abstract

Over the past several years, investigations in both low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity and increased radioresistance have been a focus of radiation oncology and biology research, since both conditions occur primarily in tumor cell lines. There has been significant progress in elucidating their signaling pathways, however uncertainties exist when they are studied together with radiation-induced bystander effects. Therefore, the aim of this work was to further investigate this relationship using the T98G glioma and HaCaT cell lines. T98G glioma cells have demonstrated a strong transition from hyper-radiosensitivity to induced radioresistance, and HaCaT cells do not show low-dose hypersensitivity. Both cell lines were paired using a mix-and-match protocol, which involved growing nonirradiated cells in culture media from irradiated cells and covering all possible combinations between them. The end points analyzed were clonogenic cell survival and live calcium measurements through the cellular membrane. Our data demonstrated that T98G cells produced bystander signals that decreased the survival of both reporter T98G and HaCaT cells. The bystander effect occurred only when T98G cells were exposed to doses below 1 Gy, which was corroborated by the induction of calcium fluxes. However, when bystander signals originated from HaCaT cells, the survival fraction increased in reporter T98G cells while it decreased in HaCaT cells. Moreover, the corresponding calcium data showed no calcium fluxes in T98G cells, while HaCaT cells displayed a biphasic calcium profile. In conclusion, our findings indicate a possible link between low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity and bystander effects. This relationship varies depending on which cell line functions as the source of bystander signals. This further suggests that the bystander mechanisms are more complex than previously expected and caution should be taken when extrapolating bystander results across all cell lines and all radiation doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26849405     DOI: 10.1667/RR14208.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  10 in total

1.  Dose rate effects of low-LET ionizing radiation on fish cells.

Authors:  Nguyen T K Vo; Colin B Seymour; Carmel E Mothersill
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Role of Mitochondria in Radiation Responses: Epigenetic, Metabolic, and Signaling Impacts.

Authors:  Dietrich Averbeck; Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Coupling of cell fate selection model enhances DNA damage response and may underlie BE phenomenon.

Authors:  Gökhan Demirkıran; Güleser Kalaycı Demir; Cüneyt Güzeliş
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.615

Review 4.  Relevance of Non-Targeted Effects for Radiotherapy and Diagnostic Radiology; A Historical and Conceptual Analysis of Key Players.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Andrej Rusin; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Isolated Clones of a Human Colorectal Carcinoma Cell Line Display Variation in Radiosensitivity Following Gamma Irradiation.

Authors:  Rhea Desai; Colin Seymour; Carmel Mothersill
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 2.623

6.  Datasets of in vitro clonogenic assays showing low dose hyper-radiosensitivity and induced radioresistance.

Authors:  Szabolcs Polgár; Paul N Schofield; Balázs G Madas
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 8.501

7.  Integrated Modelling of Cell Responses after Irradiation for DNA-Targeted Effects and Non-Targeted Effects.

Authors:  Yusuke Matsuya; Kohei Sasaki; Yuji Yoshii; Go Okuyama; Hiroyuki Date
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Biological Entanglement-Like Effect After Communication of Fish Prior to X-Ray Exposure.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Richard Smith; Jiaxi Wang; Andrej Rusin; Cris Fernandez-Palomo; Jennifer Fazzari; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 9.  Molecular mechanism of bystander effects and related abscopal/cohort effects in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Rong Wang; Tingyang Zhou; Wei Liu; Li Zuo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-06

10.  Synchrotron X-Ray Radiation-Induced Bystander Effect: An Impact of the Scattered Radiation, Distance From the Irradiated Site and p53 Cell Status.

Authors:  Pavel Lobachevsky; Helen B Forrester; Alesia Ivashkevich; Joel Mason; Andrew W Stevenson; Chris J Hall; Carl N Sprung; Valentin G Djonov; Olga A Martin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.