Literature DB >> 26849381

Cost of skeletal complications from bone metastases in six European countries.

J Pereira1, J-J Body2, O Gunther3, H Sleeboom4, G Hechmati5, N Maniadakis6, E Terpos7, Y P Acklin8, J Finek9, R von Moos10.   

Abstract

Objective Patients with bone metastases or lesions secondary to solid tumors or multiple myeloma often experience bone complications (skeletal-related events [SREs]-radiation to bone, pathologic fracture, surgery to bone, and spinal cord compression); however, recent data that can be used to assess the value of treatments to prevent SREs across European countries are limited. This study aimed to provide estimates of health resource utilization (HRU) and cost associated with all SRE types in Europe. HRU data were reported previously; cost data are reported herein. Methods Eligible patients from 49 centers across Austria (n = 57), the Czech Republic (n = 59), Finland (n = 60), Greece (n = 59), Portugal (n = 59), and Sweden (n = 62) had bone metastases or lesions secondary to breast, lung, or prostate cancer, or multiple myeloma, and ≥1 index SRE (a SRE preceded by a SRE-free period of ≥ 6.5 months). SRE-related costs were estimated from a payer perspective using health resource utilization data from patient charts (before and after the index SRE diagnosis). Country-specific unit costs were from 2010 and local currencies were converted to 2010 euros. Results The mean costs across countries were €7043, €5242, €11,101, and €11,509 per radiation to bone, pathologic fracture, surgery to bone, and spinal cord compression event, respectively. Purchasing power parity (PPP)-adjusted mean cost ratios were similar in most countries, with the exception of radiation to bone. Limitations The overall burden of SREs may have been under-estimated owing to home visits and evaluations outside the hospital setting not being reported here. Conclusions All SREs were associated with substantial costs. Variation in SRE-associated costs between countries was most likely driven by differences in treatment practices and unit costs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone metastases; Cost; Europe; Skeletal-related events; Supportive care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26849381     DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1150852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  12 in total

1.  The burden of symptomatic skeletal events in castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients with bone metastases at three Canadian uro-oncology centres.

Authors:  Fred Saad; Neil E Fleshner; Alan So; Jacques Le Lorier; Louise Perrault; Melanie Poulin-Costello; Raina Rogoza; Ewan J D Robson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Denosumab treatment in the management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: clinical evidence and experience.

Authors:  Miriam Hegemann; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Tilman Todenhöfer
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-02-06

3.  Comparative Treatment Persistence with Bone-Targeting Agents Among Asian Patients with Bone Metastases from Solid Tumors: A Multinational Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chin-Yao Shen; Philip Chun-Ming Au; Yeon-Hee Baek; Ching-Lung Cheung; Wei-Pang Chung; Ju Hwan Kim; Nora J Kleinman; Tai-Chung Lam; Tzu-Chi Liao; Tzu-Chieh Lin; Ju-Young Shin; Chor-Wing Sing; Ian Chi Kei Wong; Edward Chia-Cheng Lai
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.807

4.  Harnessing the potential of therapeutic agents to safeguard bone health in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kurt Miller; Günther G Steger; Daniela Niepel; Diana Lüftner
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 5.  Current concepts and trends in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Miriam Hegemann; Moritz Maas; Steffen Rausch; Simon Walz; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Tilman Todenhöfer
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  A real-world study assessing the use of bone-targeted agents and their impact on bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer treated in clinical practice in Europe.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Body; Roger von Moos; Alex Rider; Pamela Hallworth; Debajyoti Bhowmik; Francesca Gatta; Guy Hechmati; Yi Qian
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.072

7.  Prospective observational study to evaluate the persistence of treatment with denosumab in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors in routine clinical practice: final analysis.

Authors:  Ferdinand Haslbauer; Andreas Petzer; Martin Safanda; Antoaneta Tomova; Miriam Porubska; Zoltán Bajory; Daniela Niepel; Christine Jaeger; Katja Bjorklof; Dmitry Kalinin; Richard Greil
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Survival and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression after spinal surgery: a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study.

Authors:  Anick Nater; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2016-03-16

9.  Bone-targeted agent treatment patterns and the impact of bone metastases on patients with advanced breast cancer in real-world practice in six European countries.

Authors:  Roger von Moos; Jean-Jacques Body; Alex Rider; Jonathan de Courcy; Debajyoti Bhowmik; Francesca Gatta; Guy Hechmati; Yi Qian
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.072

Review 10.  State-of-the-art imaging for diagnosis of metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  Amanda Isaac; Danoob Dalili; Daniel Dalili; Marc-André Weber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.