Literature DB >> 26849375

Men and women should be separately investigated in studies of orthostatic challenge due to different gender-related dynamics of autonomic response.

S Reulecke1, S Charleston-Villalobos, A Voss, R González-Camarena, J González-Hermosillo, M J Gaitán-González, G Hernández-Pacheco, R Schroeder, T Aljama-Corrales.   

Abstract

In studies of autonomic regulation during orthostatic challenges only a few nonlinear methods have been considered without investigating the effect of gender in young controls. Especially, the temporal development of the autonomic regulation has not yet been explicitly analyzed using short-term segments in supine position, transition and orthostatic phase (OP). In this study, nonlinear analysis of cardiovascular and respiratory time series was performed to investigate how nonlinear indices are dynamically changing with respect to gender during orthostatic challenges. The analysis was carried out using shifted short-term segments throughout a head-up tilt test in 24 healthy subjects, 12 men (26  ±  4 years) and 12 age-matched women (26  ±  5 years), at supine position and during OP at 70°. The nonlinear methods demonstrated statistical differences in the autonomic regulation between males and females. Orthostatic stress caused significantly decreased heart rate variability due to increased sympathetic activity mainly in men, already at the beginning and during the complete OP, revealed by (a) increased occurrence of specific word types with constant fluctuations as pW111 from symbolic dynamics, (b) augmented fractal correlation properties by the short-term index alpha1 from detrended fluctuation analysis, (c) increased slope indices (21ati and 31ati) from auto-transinformation and (d) augmented time irreversibility indices demonstrating more temporal asymmetries and nonlinear dynamics in men than in women. After tilt-up, both men and women increased their sympathetic activity but in a different way. Time-dependent gender differences during orthostatic challenge were shown directly between men and women or indirectly comparing baseline and different temporal stages of OP. The proposed dynamical study of autonomic regulation has the advantage of screening the fluctuations of the sympathetic and vagal activities that can be quantified by the temporal behavior of nonlinear indices. The findings in this paper strongly suggest the need for gender separation in studies of the dynamics of autonomic regulation during orthostatic challenge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26849375     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/37/3/314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  4 in total

1.  Body Size Predicts Cardiac and Vascular Resistance Effects on Men's and Women's Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Joyce M Evans; Siqi Wang; Christopher Greb; Vladimir Kostas; Charles F Knapp; Qingguang Zhang; Eric S Roemmele; Michael B Stenger; David C Randall
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  The Influence of Gender and Anthropometry on Haemodynamic Status at Rest and in Response to Graded Incremental Head-Up Tilt in Young, Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Delphine Sarafian; Jennifer L Miles-Chan
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Time-Frequency Analysis of Cardiovascular and Cardiorespiratory Interactions During Orthostatic Stress by Extended Partial Directed Coherence.

Authors:  Sonia Charleston-Villalobos; Sina Reulecke; Andreas Voss; Mahmood R Azimi-Sadjadi; Ramón González-Camarena; Mercedes J Gaitán-González; Jesús A González-Hermosillo; Guadalupe Hernández-Pacheco; Steffen Schulz; Tomás Aljama-Corrales
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-05       Impact factor: 2.524

4.  Posture-Related Differences in Cardiovascular Function Between Young Men and Women: Study of Noninvasive Hemodynamics in Rural Malawi.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar Choudhary; Roosa-Maria Penninkangas; Arttu Eräranta; Onni Niemelä; Charles Mangani; Kenneth Maleta; Per Ashorn; Ulla Ashorn; Ilkka Pörsti
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.106

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.