Literature DB >> 26849121

Atmospheric Mercury Transfer to Peat Bogs Dominated by Gaseous Elemental Mercury Dry Deposition.

Maxime Enrico1,2, Gaël Le Roux1, Nicolas Marusczak2, Lars-Eric Heimbürger2, Adrien Claustres1, Xuewu Fu2, Ruoyu Sun2, Jeroen E Sonke2.   

Abstract

Gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) is the dominant form of mercury in the atmosphere. Its conversion into oxidized gaseous and particulate forms is thought to drive atmospheric mercury wet deposition to terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, where it can be subsequently transformed into toxic methylmercury. The contribution of mercury dry deposition is however largely unconstrained. Here we examine mercury mass balance and mercury stable isotope composition in a peat bog ecosystem. We find that isotope signatures of living sphagnum moss (Δ(199)Hg = -0.11 ± 0.09‰, Δ(200)Hg = 0.03 ± 0.02‰, 1σ) and recently accumulated peat (Δ(199)Hg = -0.22 ± 0.06‰, Δ(200)Hg = 0.00 ± 0.04‰, 1σ) are characteristic of GEM (Δ(199)Hg = -0.17 ± 0.07‰, Δ(200)Hg = -0.05 ± 0.02‰, 1σ), and differs from wet deposition (Δ(199)Hg = 0.73 ± 0.15‰, Δ(200)Hg = 0.21 ± 0.04‰, 1σ). Sphagnum covered during three years by transparent and opaque surfaces, which eliminate wet deposition, continue to accumulate Hg. Sphagnum Hg isotope signatures indicate accumulation to take place by GEM dry deposition, and indicate little photochemical re-emission. We estimate that atmospheric mercury deposition to the peat bog surface is dominated by GEM dry deposition (79%) rather than wet deposition (21%). Consequently, peat deposits are potential records of past atmospheric GEM concentrations and isotopic composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26849121     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b06058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  13 in total

1.  Tundra uptake of atmospheric elemental mercury drives Arctic mercury pollution.

Authors:  Daniel Obrist; Yannick Agnan; Martin Jiskra; Christine L Olson; Dominique P Colegrove; Jacques Hueber; Christopher W Moore; Jeroen E Sonke; Detlev Helmig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Variations in the isotopic composition of stable mercury isotopes in typical mangrove plants of the Jiulong estuary, SE China.

Authors:  Lumin Sun; Bingyan Lu; Dongxing Yuan; Wenbo Hao; Ying Zheng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Mercury and arsenic in the surface peat soils of the Changbai Mountains, northeastern China: distribution, environmental controls, sources, and ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Zucheng Wang; Hongyan Zhao; Matthew Peros; Qiannan Yang; Shasha Liu; Hongkai Li; Shengzhong Wang; Zhaojun Bu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Global warming accelerates uptake of atmospheric mercury in regions experiencing glacier retreat.

Authors:  Xun Wang; Ji Luo; Wei Yuan; Che-Jen Lin; Feiyue Wang; Chen Liu; Genxu Wang; Xinbin Feng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mercury biogeochemical cycling: A synthesis of recent scientific advances.

Authors:  Mae Sexauer Gustin; Michael S Bank; Kevin Bishop; Katlin Bowman; Brian Branfireun; John Chételat; Chris S Eckley; Chad R Hammerschmidt; Carl Lamborg; Seth Lyman; Antonio Martínez-Cortizas; Jonas Sommar; Martin Tsz-Ki Tsui; Tong Zhang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Mercury stable isotopes constrain atmospheric sources to the ocean.

Authors:  Martin Jiskra; Lars-Eric Heimbürger-Boavida; Marie-Maëlle Desgranges; Mariia V Petrova; Aurélie Dufour; Beatriz Ferreira-Araujo; Jérémy Masbou; Jérôme Chmeleff; Melilotus Thyssen; David Point; Jeroen E Sonke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 69.504

Review 7.  A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land use.

Authors:  Daniel Obrist; Jane L Kirk; Lei Zhang; Elsie M Sunderland; Martin Jiskra; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

8.  Transfer of marine mercury to mountain lakes.

Authors:  Sophia V Hansson; Jeroen Sonke; Didier Galop; Gilles Bareille; Séverine Jean; Gaël Le Roux
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Mercury evasion from a boreal peatland shortens the timeline for recovery from legacy pollution.

Authors:  Stefan Osterwalder; Kevin Bishop; Christine Alewell; Johannes Fritsche; Hjalmar Laudon; Staffan Åkerblom; Mats B Nilsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Photoreduction of gaseous oxidized mercury changes global atmospheric mercury speciation, transport and deposition.

Authors:  Alfonso Saiz-Lopez; Sebastian P Sitkiewicz; Daniel Roca-Sanjuán; Josep M Oliva-Enrich; Juan Z Dávalos; Rafael Notario; Martin Jiskra; Yang Xu; Feiyue Wang; Colin P Thackray; Elsie M Sunderland; Daniel J Jacob; Oleg Travnikov; Carlos A Cuevas; A Ulises Acuña; Daniel Rivero; John M C Plane; Douglas E Kinnison; Jeroen E Sonke
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.