| Literature DB >> 26849013 |
M Sakurai1, H Kasahara1, K Yoshida2, A Yoshimi3, H Kunimoto1, N Watanabe4, Y Shiraishi5, K Chiba5, H Tanaka6, Y Harada7, H Harada7, T Kawakita8, M Kurokawa3, S Miyano5,6, S Takahashi8, S Ogawa2, S Okamoto1, H Nakajima1.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26849013 PMCID: PMC4771963 DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2015.81
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood Cancer J ISSN: 2044-5385 Impact factor: 11.037
Figure 1Clinical, pathological and molecular data of patient 1. (a) Photographs of BM smears and biopsies. BM smears were stained with May-Grunwald Giemsa staining. BM biopsies were stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) or silver staining. Original magnification; 400 × or 1000 × . (b) Family tree of the pedigree. Filled symbols; affected members, slashed symbols; deceased members, arrow; proband, square; male, circle; female, diamond; sex not determined. AL; acute leukemia, ML; malignant lymphoma. (c) Schematic data of array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on RUNX1 locus. aCGH was performed using custom-made oligonucleotide microarrays (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) covering human chromosome 21, including RUNX1 locus with resolution of several hundred base pairs. A chromosomal region of heterozygous microdeletion is indicated by red arrows. (d) Validated somatic mutations identified in T or non T cells of patient 1. Whole-exome sequencing was performed as described previously.[13] Whole-exome capture was accomplished with the cDNA library prepared by SureSelect Human All Exon V5 (Agilent Technologies). Captured targets were subjected to massively parallel sequencing by Illumina HiSeq 2000 (San Diego, CA, USA). Candidate somatic nucleotide variants were validated by deep sequencing. (e) A proposed model of disease progression and clonal architecture of patient 1. HSCs with haploinsufficient RUNX1 first acquire mutations of TET2 and MLL2, which establishes pre-leukemic state. Premalignant HSCs then acquire RB1 mutation to progress into full-blown myelodysplastic syndrome with myelofibrosis (MF).
Figure 2Clinical, cytogenetic and molecular data of patient 2. (a) Karyotype analysis of BM cells. Arrow indicates additional chromosome 21. (b) Family tree of the pedigree. Filled symbols; affected members, gray symbols; members with thrombocytopenia, arrow; proband, square; male, circle; female. DS; Down syndrome-like phenotype, MR; mental retardation. (c) Schematic data of aCGH on RUNX1 locus. aCGH was performed as described in Figure 1. A chromosomal region of heterozygous microdeletion is indicated by red arrows. FISH probes for 5′- or 3′-RUNX1 locus are indicated by green or red lines, respectively. (d) FISH analysis of BM cells for RUNX1 locus. 99.7% (997/1000) of evaluable cells presented trisomy 21 with abnormal signals for RUNX1 locus. Arrows indicate abnormal chromosome 21 hybridized only with 3′-probe (red signals). Arrowhead indicates normal chromosome 21 hybridized to both 5′- and 3′-probes. (e) Validated somatic mutations identified in BMMNCs of patient 2. Whole-exome and deep sequencing was performed as described in Figure 1. (f) A proposed model of disease progression of patient 2. In transformed cells, abnormal chromosome 21 with haploinsufficient RUNX1 allele duplicated, which collaborated with mutations of ZRSR2 and BCOR genes to initiate myelodysplastic syndrome.