Literature DB >> 26848937

Measuring the impact of non-monetary incentives on facility delivery in rural Zambia: a clustered randomised controlled trial.

P Wang1, A L Connor1, E Guo1, M Nambao2, P Chanda-Kapata3, N Lambo4, C Phiri2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In Zambia, only 56% of rural women deliver in a health facility, and improving facility delivery rates is a priority of the Zambian government. 'Mama kit' incentives - small packages of childcare items provided to mothers conditional on delivering their baby in a facility - may encourage facility delivery. This study measured the impact and cost-effectiveness of a US$4 mama kit on rural facility delivery rates in Zambia.
METHODS: A clustered randomised controlled trial was used to measure the impact of mama kits on facility delivery rates in thirty rural health facilities in Serenje and Chadiza districts. Facility-level antenatal care and delivery registers were used to measure the percentage of women attending antenatal care who delivered at a study facility during the intervention period. Results from the trial were then used to model the cost-effectiveness of mama kits at-scale in terms of cost per death averted.
RESULTS: The mama kits intervention resulted in a statistically significant increase in facility delivery rates. The multivariate logistic regression found that the mama kits intervention increased the odds of delivering at a facility by 63% (P-value < 0.01, 95% CI: 29%, 106%), or an increase of 9.9 percentage points, yielding a cost-effectiveness of US$5183 per death averted.
CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation confirms that low-cost mama kits can be a cost-effective intervention to increase facility delivery rates in rural Zambia. Mama kits alone are unlikely to completely solve safe delivery challenges but should be embedded in larger maternal and child health programmes.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accouchement institutionnel; ensayo aleatorizado y controlado; essai contrôlé randomisé; incentives; incentivos; incitations; institutional delivery; maternal health; newborn health; parto hospitalario; randomised controlled trial; salud del neonato; salud materna; santé maternelle; santé néonatale

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26848937     DOI: 10.1111/tmi.12678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Med Int Health        ISSN: 1360-2276            Impact factor:   2.622


  4 in total

1.  Increasing utilisation of skilled facility-based maternal healthcare services in rural Zambia: the role of safe motherhood action groups.

Authors:  Cephas Sialubanje; Karlijn Massar; Larah Horstkotte; Davidson H Hamer; Robert A C Ruiter
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 3.223

2.  Impact of the Safe Childbirth Checklist on health worker childbirth practices in Luapula province of Zambia: a pre-post study.

Authors:  Sandra Mudhune; Sydney Chauwa Phiri; Marta R Prescott; Elizabeth A McCarthy; Aaron Banda; Prudence Haimbe; Francis Dien Mwansa; Angel Mwiche; Francis Bwalya; Micheck Kabamba; Hilda Shakwelele; Margaret L Prust
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Associations between birth kit use and maternal and neonatal health outcomes in rural Jigawa state, Nigeria: A secondary analysis of data from a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jessica Leight; Vandana Sharma; Willa Brown; Laura Costica; Fatima Abdulaziz Sule; Martina Bjorkman Nyqvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Interventions to increase facility births and provision of postpartum care in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.

Authors:  Bienvenu Salim Camara; Alexandre Delamou; Fassou Mathias Grovogui; Bregje Christina de Kok; Lenka Benova; Alison Marie El Ayadi; Rene Gerrets; Koen Peeters Grietens; Thérèse Delvaux
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.