K E Remy1, J Sun1, D Wang1, J Welsh2, S B Solomon1, H G Klein3, C Natanson1, I Cortés-Puch1. 1. Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. 2. NIH Library, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. 3. Department of Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preclinical studies generated the hypothesis that older stored red blood cells (RBCs) can increase transfusion risks. To examine the most updated and complete clinical evidence and compare results between two trial designs, we assessed both observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying the effect of RBC storage age on mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five databases were searched through December 2014 for studies comparing mortality using transfused RBCs having longer and shorter storage times. RESULTS: Analysis of six RCTs found no significant differences in survival comparing current practice (average storage age of 2 to 3 weeks) to transfusion of 1- to 10-day-old RBCs (OR 0·91, 95% CI 0·77-1·07). RBC storage age was lower in RCTs vs. observational studies (P = 0·01). The 31 observational studies found an increased risk of death (OR 1·13, 95% CI 1·03-1·24) (P = 0·01) with increasing age of RBCs, a different mortality effect than RCTs (P = 0·02). CONCLUSION: RCTs established that transfusion of 1- to 10-day-old stored RBCs is not superior to current practice. The apparent discrepancy in mortality between analyses of RCTs and observational studies may in part relate to differences in hypotheses tested and ages of stored RBCs studied. Further trials investigating 1- to 10-day-old stored RBC benefits would seem of lower priority than studies to determine whether 4- to 6-week stored units have safety and efficacy equivalent to the 2- to 3-week-old stored RBCs commonly transfused today.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preclinical studies generated the hypothesis that older stored red blood cells (RBCs) can increase transfusion risks. To examine the most updated and complete clinical evidence and compare results between two trial designs, we assessed both observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying the effect of RBC storage age on mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five databases were searched through December 2014 for studies comparing mortality using transfused RBCs having longer and shorter storage times. RESULTS: Analysis of six RCTs found no significant differences in survival comparing current practice (average storage age of 2 to 3 weeks) to transfusion of 1- to 10-day-old RBCs (OR 0·91, 95% CI 0·77-1·07). RBC storage age was lower in RCTs vs. observational studies (P = 0·01). The 31 observational studies found an increased risk of death (OR 1·13, 95% CI 1·03-1·24) (P = 0·01) with increasing age of RBCs, a different mortality effect than RCTs (P = 0·02). CONCLUSION: RCTs established that transfusion of 1- to 10-day-old stored RBCs is not superior to current practice. The apparent discrepancy in mortality between analyses of RCTs and observational studies may in part relate to differences in hypotheses tested and ages of stored RBCs studied. Further trials investigating 1- to 10-day-old stored RBC benefits would seem of lower priority than studies to determine whether 4- to 6-week stored units have safety and efficacy equivalent to the 2- to 3-week-old stored RBCs commonly transfused today.
Authors: Chenell Donadee; Nicolaas J H Raat; Tamir Kanias; Jesús Tejero; Janet S Lee; Eric E Kelley; Xuejun Zhao; Chen Liu; Hannah Reynolds; Ivan Azarov; Sheila Frizzell; E Michael Meyer; Albert D Donnenberg; Lirong Qu; Darrel Triulzi; Daniel B Kim-Shapiro; Mark T Gladwin Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-07-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Marie E Steiner; Paul M Ness; Susan F Assmann; Darrell J Triulzi; Steven R Sloan; Meghan Delaney; Suzanne Granger; Elliott Bennett-Guerrero; Morris A Blajchman; Vincent Scavo; Jeffrey L Carson; Jerrold H Levy; Glenn Whitman; Pamela D'Andrea; Shelley Pulkrabek; Thomas L Ortel; Larissa Bornikova; Thomas Raife; Kathleen E Puca; Richard M Kaufman; Gregory A Nuttall; Pampee P Young; Samuel Youssef; Richard Engelman; Philip E Greilich; Ronald Miles; Cassandra D Josephson; Arthur Bracey; Rhonda Cooke; Jeffrey McCullough; Robert Hunsaker; Lynne Uhl; Janice G McFarland; Yara Park; Melissa M Cushing; Charles T Klodell; Ravindra Karanam; Pamela R Roberts; Cornelius Dyke; Eldad A Hod; Christopher P Stowell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Herb A Phelan; Alexander L Eastman; Kim Aldy; Elizabeth A Carroll; Paul A Nakonezny; Tiffany Jan; Jessi L Howard; Yixiao Chen; Randall S Friese; Joseph P Minei Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Jordan A Weinberg; Gerald McGwin; Russell L Griffin; Vu Q Huynh; Samuel A Cherry; Marisa B Marques; Donald A Reiff; Jeffrey D Kerby; Loring W Rue Journal: J Trauma Date: 2008-08
Authors: Dean A Fergusson; Paul Hébert; Debora L Hogan; Louise LeBel; Nicole Rouvinez-Bouali; John A Smyth; Koravangattu Sankaran; Alan Tinmouth; Morris A Blajchman; Lajos Kovacs; Christian Lachance; Shoo Lee; C Robin Walker; Brian Hutton; Robin Ducharme; Katelyn Balchin; Tim Ramsay; Jason C Ford; Ashok Kakadekar; Kuppuchipalayam Ramesh; Stan Shapiro Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Meera R Chappidi; Heather J Chalfin; Daniel J Johnson; Max Kates; Nikolai A Sopko; Michael H Johnson; Jen-Jane Liu; Steven M Frank; Trinity J Bivalacqua Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Francesca Rapido; Gary M Brittenham; Sheila Bandyopadhyay; Francesca La Carpia; Camilla L'Acqua; Donald J McMahon; Abdelhadi Rebbaa; Boguslaw S Wojczyk; Jane Netterwald; Hangli Wang; Joseph Schwartz; Andrew Eisenberger; Mark Soffing; Randy Yeh; Chaitanya Divgi; Yelena Z Ginzburg; Beth H Shaz; Sujit Sheth; Richard O Francis; Steven L Spitalnik; Eldad A Hod Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Sofie L Rygård; Andreas B Jonsson; Martin B Madsen; Anders Perner; Lars B Holst; Pär I Johansson; Jørn Wetterslev Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Kenneth E Remy; Mark W Hall; Jill Cholette; Nicole P Juffermans; Kathleen Nicol; Allan Doctor; Neil Blumberg; Philip C Spinella; Philip J Norris; Mary K Dahmer; Jennifer A Muszynski Journal: Transfusion Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Jaroslav G Vostal; Paul W Buehler; Monique P Gelderman; Abdu I Alayash; Alan Doctor; James C Zimring; Simone A Glynn; John R Hess; Harvey Klein; Jason P Acker; Philip C Spinella; Angelo D'Alessandro; Bernhard Palsson; Thomas J Raife; Michael P Busch; Timothy J McMahon; Marcos Intaglietta; Harold M Swartz; Michael A Dubick; Sylvain Cardin; Rakesh P Patel; Charles Natanson; John W Weisel; Jennifer A Muszynski; Philip J Norris; Paul M Ness Journal: Transfusion Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Kevin P Blaine; Irene Cortés-Puch; Junfeng Sun; Dong Wang; Steven B Solomon; Jing Feng; Mark T Gladwin; Daniel B Kim-Shapiro; Swati Basu; Andreas Perlegas; Kamille West; Harvey G Klein; Charles Natanson Journal: Transfusion Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 3.157