| Literature DB >> 26848687 |
Taoran Zhao1, Xinghui Zhao2, Ju Liu3, Yingying Meng4, Yingying Feng5, Ting Fang6, Jinlong Zhang7, Xiuxu Yang8, Jianmin Li9, Junjie Xu10, Wei Chen11.
Abstract
Edema toxin (ET), which is composed of a potent adenylate cyclase (AC), <hemical">span class="Disease">edema factor (EF), and protective antigen (PA), is one of the major toxicity factors of Bacillus anthracis. In this study, we introduced mutations in full-length EF to generate alanine EF(H351A) and arginine EF(H351R) variants. In vitro activity analysis displayed that the adenylyl cyclase activity of both the mutants was significantly diminished compared with the wild-type EF. When the native and mutant toxins were administered subcutaneously in a mouse footpad edema model, severe acute swelling was evoked by wild-type ET, while the symptoms induced by mutant toxins were very minor. Systemic administration of these EF variants caused non-lethal hepatotoxicity. In addition, EF(H351R) exhibited slightly higher activity in causing more severe edema than EF(H351A). Our findings demonstrate that the toxicity of ET is not abolished by substitution of EF residue His351 by alanine or arginine. These results also indicate the potential of the mouse footpad edema model as a sensitive method for evaluating both ET toxicity and the efficacy of candidate therapeutic agents.Entities:
Keywords: anthrax toxin; edema factor; evaluation model
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26848687 PMCID: PMC4773788 DOI: 10.3390/toxins8020035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Figure 1Purification of wild-type EF, EF(H351A) and EF(H351R) proteins expressed in E. coli M15 strain. (a) SDS-PAGE analysis of Ni-NTA affinity purified wild-type EF: M, molecular weight marker; lane 1, total soluble fraction; lane 2, elution fraction; (b) SDS-PAGE analysis of SP-sepharose cation-exchange chromatography purified wild-type EF: M, molecular weight marker; lane 1, total soluble fraction; lane 2, elution fraction. Similar results were obtained following purification of EF(H351A) and EF(H351R) proteins using the same procedures; (c) SDS-PAGE (10% gel) analysis of 1 μg of purified EF, EF(H351A), and EF(H351R): M, molecular weight marker; Lane 1, EF; lane 2, EF(H351A); lane 3, EF(H351R).
Figure 2In vitro adenylate cyclase activity assay of EF, EF(H351A), or EF(H351R). (a) CHO cells were incubated for 2 h with forskolin (50 μg/mL and 5 μg/mL), SQ22536(50 μg/mL and 5 μg/mL) or DMSO control. Intracellular cAMP was measured using an EIA kit; (b) CHO cells were incubated for 2 h with PA (1 μg/mL) and EF, EF(H351A), or EF(H351R) at the indicated concentrations. Intracellular cAMP was measured using an EIA kit. An average of 13 pmol of cAMP/107 CHO cells was detected in control cells (untreated cells or cells treated with only one toxin component). Results are expressed as mean ± standard error. Statistical significance: (** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05).
Figure 3ET-induced footpad edema in mice. 25 μg of forskolin or SQ22536 dissolved in 25 μL DMSO were injected subcutaneously into the footpad; 25 μL of DMSO was administered as the solvent control. (a) Footpad thickness was measured at 0, 5, 17, and 49 h after injection; (b) cAMP levels in the treated footpads tissue. Mice were injected subcutaneously with 500 ng EF and 1000 ng PA (in 25 μL PBS), 500 ng EF(H351R) and 1000 ng PA or 500 ng EF(H351A) and 1000 ng PA; (c) Footpad thickness was measured at 0, 12, 24, 53, and 76 h after injection; (d) cAMP levels in the treated footpads tissue; (e) Comparison of right footpads treated with 1000 ng PA only (1), 500 ng EF and 1000 ng PA (2), 500 ng EF(H351R) and 1000 ng PA (3), or 500 ng EF(H351A) and 1000 ng PA (4). Mutant EF(H351A) induced modest edema, while wild-type EF caused much higher levels of edema; (f) and (g) Serial doses (0.5, 5, 50, 500, and 2500 ng) of EF, EF(H351R) or EF(H351A) in combination with double concentrations of PA were subcutaneously injected into the footpad; the degree edema at 24 h and 53 h after injection are shown. Significant differences between the groups are indicated by p-values. The p-values of the indicated groups versus the solvent control group are shown. Data represent the mean ± standard error of the mean based on n = 3 mice per treatment. At least two biological replicates were performed for each experiment. (** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05).
Figure 4Systemic effects of wild-type and His351 EF mutants. (a) Survival rate of groups of three C57BL/6 mice challenged with wild-type or mutant EF (50 μg) and PA (100 μg). Mice challenged with EF (wild-type) + PA died within 12 h, while none died in the groups challenged with EF(H351R) + PA or EF(H351A) + PA, or in the control groups (EF or PA only). Mice were injected intravenously with PBS, EF (100 μg) and PA (200 μg), or EF(H351A) (100 μg) and PA (200 μg); (b) Histology of liver and lung tissues of mice treated with ET or ET(H351A). Mice treated with EF in combination with PA died within 3 h, and were immediately necropsied. Mice treated EF(H351A) in combination with PA were euthanized 6 h later by CO2 inhalation and immediately necropsied. In the liver, sinusoid stenosis (left arrow), scattered necrotic lesions, and inflammatory cell infiltration (right arrow) were found in mice treated with EF(H351A) in combination with PA, while more marked necrotic lesions and inflammatory cell infiltration (right arrow) accompanied by hemorrhaging (left arrow) were identified in mice treated with EF in combination with and PA. In the lungs, hemorrhaging, edema, and inflammatory cell infiltration (arrows) were found around the trachea and bronchus in mice treated with EF in combination with PA but not in those treated with EF(H351A) in combination with PA; (c) and (d) cAMP levels in liver and lung tissues of mice treated with ET or ET (H351A). Mice were euthanized by CO2 inhalation 2 h after injection and immediately necropsied. Significant differences between the groups are indicated by p-values. The p-values of the indicated groups versus the solvent control group are shown. Data represent the mean ± standard error of the mean based on n = 3 mice per treatment. At least two biological replicates were performed for each experiment. (** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05).
Constituents of buffers used.
| Solution | Ingredient | pH |
|---|---|---|
| Buffer A | 50 mM sodium phosphate, 300 mM sodium chloride | 8.0 |
| Buffer B1 | 1% Glycerin and 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol added to buffer A | 8.0 |
| Buffer B2 | 20 mM imidazole added to buffer B1 | 8.0 |
| Buffer B3 | 100 mM imidazole added to buffer B1 | 8.0 |
| Buffer C | 20 mM potassium phosphate, 1 mM EDTA, 1% glycerin and 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol | 7.0 |