Literature DB >> 26848138

Novel Use of Google Glass for Procedural Wireless Vital Sign Monitoring.

Cara A Liebert1, Mohamed A Zayed2, Oliver Aalami3, Jennifer Tran1, James N Lau1.   

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the feasibility and potential utility of head-mounted displays for real-time wireless vital sign monitoring during surgical procedures. Methods In this randomized controlled pilot study, surgery residents (n = 14) performed simulated bedside procedures with traditional vital sign monitors and were randomized to addition of vital sign streaming to Google Glass. Time to recognition of preprogrammed vital sign deterioration and frequency of traditional monitor use was recorded. User feedback was collected by electronic survey. Results The experimental group spent 90% less time looking away from the procedural field to view traditional monitors during bronchoscopy (P = .003), and recognized critical desaturation 8.8 seconds earlier; the experimental group spent 71% (P = .01) less time looking away from the procedural field during thoracostomy, and recognized hypotension 10.5 seconds earlier. Trends toward earlier recognition of deterioration did not reach statistical significance. The majority of participants agreed that Google Glass increases situational awareness (64%), is helpful in monitoring vitals (86%), is easy to use (93%), and has potential to improve patient safety (85%). Conclusion In this early feasibility study, use of streaming to Google Glass significantly decreased time looking away from procedural fields and resulted in a nonsignificant trend toward earlier recognition of vital sign deterioration. Vital sign streaming with Google Glass or similar platforms is feasible and may enhance procedural situational awareness.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomedical engineering; ergonomics; human factors study; simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26848138     DOI: 10.1177/1553350616630142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Innov        ISSN: 1553-3506            Impact factor:   2.058


  10 in total

1.  Feasibility and safety of augmented reality-assisted urological surgery using smartglass.

Authors:  H Borgmann; M Rodríguez Socarrás; J Salem; I Tsaur; J Gomez Rivas; E Barret; L Tortolero
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  A Systematic Review of the Use of Google Glass in Graduate Medical Education.

Authors:  Joseph F Carrera; Connor C Wang; William Clark; Andrew M Southerland
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-12

Review 3.  Augmenting Critical Care Patient Monitoring Using Wearable Technology: Review of Usability and Human Factors.

Authors:  Evismar Andrade; Leo Quinlan; Richard Harte; Dara Byrne; Enda Fallon; Martina Kelly; Siobhan Casey; Frank Kirrane; Paul O'Connor; Denis O'Hora; Michael Scully; John Laffey; Patrick Pladys; Alain Beuchée; Gearoid ÓLaighin
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2021-05-25

4.  Evaluation of Google Glass Technical Limitations on Their Integration in Medical Systems.

Authors:  Antonio Martinez-Millana; Jose-Luis Bayo-Monton; Aroa Lizondo; Carlos Fernandez-Llatas; Vicente Traver
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Augmented reality: The use of the PicoLinker smart glasses improves wire insertion under fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Takafumi Hiranaka; Takaaki Fujishiro; Yuichi Hida; Yosaku Shibata; Masanori Tsubosaka; Yuta Nakanishi; Kenjiro Okimura; Harunobu Uemoto
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-12-18

6.  Adherence to AHA Guidelines When Adapted for Augmented Reality Glasses for Assisted Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Johan N Siebert; Frederic Ehrler; Alain Gervaix; Kevin Haddad; Laurence Lacroix; Philippe Schrurs; Ayhan Sahin; Christian Lovis; Sergio Manzano
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 7.  Using Google Glass in Surgical Settings: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nancy J Wei; Bryn Dougherty; Aundria Myers; Sherif M Badawy
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Feasibility of Telesimulation and Google Glass for Mass Casualty Triage Education and Training.

Authors:  C Eric McCoy; Rola Alrabah; Warren Weichmann; Mark I Langdorf; Cameron Ricks; Bharath Chakravarthy; Craig Anderson; Shahram Lotfipour
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-04-26

Review 9.  Smart Glasses for Caring Situations in Complex Care Environments: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Charlotte Romare; Lisa Skär
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 10.  Is the use of augmented reality-assisted surgery beneficial in urological education? A systematic review.

Authors:  Ibraheem Alrishan Alzouebi; Sanad Saad; Tom Farmer; Sophie Green
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2021-08-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.