Literature DB >> 26847782

Structured Handover in the Pediatric Postanesthesia Care Unit.

Emily Funk, Brad Taicher, Julie Thompson, Kelly Iannello, Brett Morgan, Sharon Hawks.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish a structured handover in the pediatric postanesthesia care unit.
DESIGN: An observational prequality and postquality improvement design was used.
METHODS: Convenience samples of 52 preimplementation and 51 postimplementation handover interactions (N = 103) were observed and compared to a 42-item Introductions, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations, & Questions checklist. Patient care team members' satisfaction was assessed using voluntary electronic surveys. Data were analyzed for descriptive measures and differences in the pre- and postchecklist, and satisfaction total scores were compared using a two-sample t test. FINDING: The implementation of the handover checklist resulted in a statistically significant increase in the percentage of items discussed during five of six handover phases (P < .001). Overall, a significant increase in provider satisfaction was demonstrated from preimplementation to postimplementation (P < .01). The average duration of handover (in minutes) was not significantly different from pre (mean = 5.80 ± 3.80) to post (mean = 6.80 ± 2.30), P = .15.
CONCLUSIONS: A structured handover checklist is associated with increased communication of handover content information and improved provider satisfaction. No statistically significant effect on handover duration time was found.
Copyright © 2016 American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ISBARQ; PACU; SBAR; communication; handover; pediatric

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26847782     DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2014.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perianesth Nurs        ISSN: 1089-9472            Impact factor:   1.084


  7 in total

1.  Operating Room-to-ICU Patient Handovers: A Multidisciplinary Human-Centered Design Approach.

Authors:  Noa Segall; Alberto S Bonifacio; Atilio Barbeito; Rebecca A Schroeder; Sharon R Perfect; Melanie C Wright; James D Emery; B Zane Atkins; Jeffrey M Taekman; Jonathan B Mark
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2016-09

Review 2.  Evidence-Based Guideline on Critical Patient Transport and Handover to ICU.

Authors:  Tesfaye Belaneh Agizew; Henos Enyew Ashagrie; Habtamu Getinet Kassahun; Mamaru Mollalign Temesgen
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 3.  Processes and tools to improve teamwork and communication in surgical settings: a narrative review.

Authors:  Sherry Espin; Alyssa Indar; Marketa Gross; Antoniette Labricciosa; Maryanne D'Arpino
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2020-06

4.  Completeness of the operating room to intensive care unit handover: a matter of time?

Authors:  Fabian Dusse; Johanna Pütz; Andreas Böhmer; Mark Schieren; Robin Joppich; Frank Wappler
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Impact of Structured Clinical Handover Protocol on Communication and Patient Satisfaction.

Authors:  Sayani Ghosh; Lakshmi Ramamoorthy; Biju Pottakat
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2021-03-03

6.  The satisfaction regarding handovers between ambulance and emergency department nurses: an observational study.

Authors:  Gijs Thomas Hovenkamp; Tycho Joan Olgers; Remco Robert Wortel; Milou Esmée Noltes; Bert Dercksen; Jan Cornelis Ter Maaten
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Effects of a stepwise handovers ISBARQ programme among nursing college students.

Authors:  Yoon Goo Noh; Insook Lee
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-06-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.