Literature DB >> 26847680

Pilot Study of a New Nonradioactive Surgical Guidance Technology for Locating Nonpalpable Breast Lesions.

Charles E Cox1, Norbert Garcia-Henriquez1, M Jordan Glancy1, Pat Whitworth2, John M Cox3, Melissa Themar-Geck4, Ronald Prati4, Michelle Jung1, Scott Russell1, Kristie Appleton2, Jeff King1, Steven C Shivers5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current technique for locating nonpalpable breast lesions is wire localization (WL). Radioactive seed localization and intraoperative ultrasound were developed to improve difficulties with WL. The SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system was developed to improve these methods. The SCOUT system is a non-radioactive, FDA-cleared medical device that uses electromagnetic wave technology to provide real-time guidance during excisional breast procedures.
METHODS: Consenting patients underwent localization and excision using an implantable electromagnetic wave reflective device (reflector) and a detector handpiece with a console. Using image guidance, the reflector was placed up to 7 days before the surgical procedure. The primary end points of the study were successful reflector placement, localization, and retrieval. The secondary end points were percentage of clear margins, reexcision rates, days of placement before excision, and physician comparison with WL.
RESULTS: This study analyzed 50 patients. The reflectors were placed under mammographic guidance (n = 18, 36 %) or ultrasound guidance (n = 32, 64 %). Of the 50 patients, 10 (20 %) underwent excisional biopsy and 40 (80 %) had a lumpectomy. The lesion and reflector were successfully removed in all 50 patients, and no adverse events occurred. Of the 41 patients who had in situ and/or invasive carcinoma identified, 38 (93 %) had clear margins and 3 (7 %) were recommended for reexcision.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the SCOUT system is safe and effective for guiding the excision of nonpalpable breast lesions and a viable alternative to standard localization options. A larger prospective, multi-institution trial of SCOUT currently is underway to validate these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26847680     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-5079-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  12 in total

1.  Can a seed-sized tool from Texas spare clinically node positive breast cancer patients from a complete axillary dissection?

Authors:  David M Fedor; Jeffrey Landercasper
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-08

Review 2.  Innovations in image-guided preoperative breast lesion localization.

Authors:  Ellen Cheang; Richard Ha; Cynthia M Thornton; Victoria L Mango
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Preoperative radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable soft tissue masses: an established localization technique with a new application.

Authors:  Hillary W Garner; Joseph M Bestic; Jeffrey J Peterson; Steven Attia; Daniel E Wessell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Doppler Ultrasound-Visible SignalMark Microspheres are Better Identified than HydroMARK® Clips in a Simulated Intraoperative Setting in Breast and Lung Tissue.

Authors:  Rachel K Voss; Erin P Ward; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Sarah L Blair
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Impact of deformation on a supine-positioned image-guided breast surgery approach.

Authors:  Winona L Richey; Jon S Heiselman; Ma Luo; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  Wireless Breast Localization Using Radio-frequency Identification Tags: The First Reported European Experience in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Umar Wazir; Salim Tayeh; Nicholas Perry; Michael Michell; Anmol Malhotra; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Preoperative Localization of Breast MRI Lesions: MRI-guided Marker Placement With Radioactive Seed Localization as an Alternative to MRI-guided Wire Localization.

Authors:  Nicole Saphier; Jessica Kondraciuk; Elizabeth Morris; Blanca Bernard-Davila; Victoria Mango
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2020-04-23

Review 8.  Image-Guided Localization Techniques for Surgical Excision of Non-Palpable Breast Lesions: An Overview of Current Literature and Our Experience with Preoperative Skin Tattoo.

Authors:  Gianluca Franceschini; Elena Jane Mason; Cristina Grippo; Sabatino D'Archi; Anna D'Angelo; Lorenzo Scardina; Alejandro Martin Sanchez; Marco Conti; Charlotte Trombadori; Daniela Andreina Terribile; Alba Di Leone; Beatrice Carnassale; Paolo Belli; Riccardo Manfredi; Riccardo Masetti
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-02-04

9.  Reflector-Guided Localisation of Non-Palpable Breast Lesions: A Prospective Evaluation of the SAVI SCOUT® System.

Authors:  Umar Wazir; Iham Kasem; Michael J Michell; Tamara Suaris; David Evans; Anmol Malhotra; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Patient and clinician satisfaction and clinical outcomes of Magseed compared with wire-guided localisation for impalpable breast lesions.

Authors:  Aikaterini E Micha; Victoria Sinnett; Kate Downey; Steve Allen; Briony Bishop; Lauren R Hector; Elaine P Patrick; Ruth Edmonds; Peter A Barry; Katherine D C Krupa; Jennifer E Rusby
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.