Literature DB >> 26847614

Imparting commercial antimicrobial dressings with low-adherence to burn wounds.

Sogol Asghari1, Sarvesh Logsetty2, Song Liu3.   

Abstract

The objective of our study was to decrease the wound adherence of commercial silver based wound dressings by depositing a non-adherent layer. Our hypothesis was that this non-adherent layer will lower the dressing's adherence to burn wounds without compromising the antimicrobial activity or increasing the cytotoxicity. A polyacrylamide (PAM) hydrogel layer was grafted on two commercial silver antimicrobial dressings (silver nanocrystal dressing (NC) and silver plated dressing (SP)) using a proprietary technique. The grafted PAM served as the non-adherent layer. Dressing adherence was measured with a previously published in vitro gelatin model using an Instron mechanical force testing instrument. The dressings were challenged with two clinically retrieved bacterial strains (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and multidrug resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa) with both a disk diffusion test, and a suspension antibacterial test. The cytotoxicity of samples to human neonatal fibroblast cells was evaluated with 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Both untreated dressings showed high peeling energy: 2070±453J/m(2) (NC) and 669±68J/m(2) (SP), that decreased to 158±119J/m(2) (NC) and 155±138J/m(2) (SP) with the PAM deposition. Addition of the PAM caused no significant difference in zone of inhibition (ZOI) (disk diffusion test) or antibacterial kinetics (suspension test) against both bacteria (p>0.05, n=6) in either dressing. Survival of fibroblasts was improved by the PAM grafting from 48±5% to 60±3% viable cells in the case of NC and from 55±8% to 61±4% viable cells in SP (p<0.05, n=12). It was concluded that PAM as a non-adherent layer significantly decreases the adherence of these two commercial antimicrobial dressings in an in vitro gelatin model while preserving their antimicrobial efficacy, and reducing their cytotoxicity.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burn wound dressing; Hydrogel; Non-adherent dressing; Polyacrylamide; Silver dressing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26847614     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  6 in total

1.  Fluorescence-tunable Ag-DNA biosensor with tailored cytotoxicity for live-cell applications.

Authors:  Nelli Bossert; Donny de Bruin; Maria Götz; Dirk Bouwmeester; Doris Heinrich
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Effect of non-adhering dressings on promotion of fibroblast proliferation and wound healing in vitro.

Authors:  Cornelia Wiegand; Martin Abel; Uta-Christina Hipler; Peter Elsner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Retrospective Study on the Clinical Superiority of the Vacuum-Assisted Closure System with a Silicon-based Dressing over the Conventional Tie-over Bolster Technique in Skin Graft Fixation.

Authors:  Ping-Ruey Chou; Sheng-Hua Wu; Meng-Chien Hsieh; Shu-Hung Huang
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Effect of a DACC-coated dressing on keratinocytes and fibroblasts in wound healing using an in vitro scratch model.

Authors:  Bianka Morgner; Johanna Husmark; Anna Arvidsson; Cornelia Wiegand
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose wound dressings supplemented with biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles from the ligninolytic fungus Anamorphous Bjerkandera sp. R1.

Authors:  Jerónimo Osorio Echavarría; Natalia Andrea Gómez Vanegas; Claudia Patricia Ossa Orozco
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-08-18

Review 6.  Nanomaterials for Wound Dressings: An Up-to-Date Overview.

Authors:  Alexandra Elena Stoica; Cristina Chircov; Alexandru Mihai Grumezescu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.