Literature DB >> 26847433

Environmental endocrine disruptors: Effects on the human male reproductive system.

M F Sweeney1, N Hasan2, A M Soto1,2,3, C Sonnenschein4,5,6.   

Abstract

Incidences of altered development and neoplasia of male reproductive organs have increased during the last 50 years, as shown by epidemiological data. These data are associated with the increased presence of environmental chemicals, specifically "endocrine disruptors," that interfere with normal hormonal action. Much research has gone into testing the effects of specific endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) on the development of male reproductive organs and endocrine-related cancers in both in vitro and in vivo models. Efforts have been made to bridge the accruing laboratory findings with the epidemiological data to draw conclusions regarding the relationship between EDCs, altered development and carcinogenesis. The ability of EDCs to predispose target fetal and adult tissues to neoplastic transformation is best explained under the framework of the tissue organization field theory of carcinogenesis (TOFT), which posits that carcinogenesis is development gone awry. Here, we focus on the available evidence, from both empirical and epidemiological studies, regarding the effects of EDCs on male reproductive development and carcinogenesis of endocrine target tissues. We also critique current research methodology utilized in the investigation of EDCs effects and outline what could possibly be done to address these obstacles moving forward.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carcinogenesis; Developmental origins of adult disease; Endocrine disruption; Male breast cancer; Male reproduction; Prostate cancer; Testicular cancer; Tissue organization field theory

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26847433      PMCID: PMC4803593          DOI: 10.1007/s11154-016-9337-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord        ISSN: 1389-9155            Impact factor:   6.514


  187 in total

1.  Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor during pregnancy in the mouse alters mammary development through direct effects on stromal and epithelial tissues.

Authors:  Betina J Lew; Ravikumar Manickam; B Paige Lawrence
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls in blood and the risk for testicular cancer.

Authors:  Lennart Hardell; Bert Van Bavel; Gunilla Lindström; Michael Carlberg; Mikael Eriksson; Ann Charlotte Dreifaldt; Hans Wijkström; Hans Starkhammar; Arne Hallquist; Torgny Kolmert
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2004-10

Review 3.  Phthalate ester toxicity in Leydig cells: developmental timing and dosage considerations.

Authors:  Ren-Shan Ge; Guo-Rong Chen; Cigdem Tanrikut; Matthew P Hardy
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.143

4.  Reproductive tract lesions in male mice exposed prenatally to diethylstilbestrol.

Authors:  J A McLachlan; R R Newbold; B Bullock
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Evolution of mRNA polyadenylation between oocyte maturation and first embryonic cleavage in cattle and its relation with developmental competence.

Authors:  T A L Brevini; P Lonergan; F Cillo; C Francisci; L A Favetta; T Fair; F Gandolfi
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.609

Review 6.  Hypospadias and urethral development.

Authors:  L S Baskin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  The tissue organization field theory of cancer: a testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory.

Authors:  Ana M Soto; Carlos Sonnenschein
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 8.  Neoplasia as development gone awry: the role of endocrine disruptors.

Authors:  Ana M Soto; Maricel V Maffini; Carlos Sonnenschein
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2007-10-31

9.  Risk of total and aggressive prostate cancer and pesticide use in the Agricultural Health Study.

Authors:  Stella Koutros; Laura E Beane Freeman; Jay H Lubin; Sonya L Heltshe; Gabriella Andreotti; Kathryn Hughes Barry; Curt T DellaValle; Jane A Hoppin; Dale P Sandler; Charles F Lynch; Aaron Blair; Michael C R Alavanja
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 10.  Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  Lisa J Martin; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Transgenerational Effects of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals on Male and Female Reproduction.

Authors:  Emily Brehm; Jodi A Flaws
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 2.  Developmental origins of male subfertility: role of infection, inflammation, and environmental factors.

Authors:  Undraga Schagdarsurengin; Patrick Western; Klaus Steger; Andreas Meinhardt
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 9.623

3.  The use of purified rat Leydig cells complements the H295R screen to detect chemical-induced alterations in testosterone production.

Authors:  Nicole L Botteri Principato; Juan D Suarez; Susan C Laws; Gary R Klinefelter
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  Endocrine disruptor phthalates in bottled water: daily exposure and health risk assessment in pregnant and lactating women.

Authors:  Maryam Zare Jeddi; Noushin Rastkari; Reza Ahmadkhaniha; Masud Yunesian
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 5.  An old culprit but a new story: bisphenol A and "NextGen" bisphenols.

Authors:  Caroline V Sartain; Patricia A Hunt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  Exposure to the environmental endocrine disruptor TCDD and human reproductive dysfunction: Translating lessons from murine models.

Authors:  Kaylon L Bruner-Tran; Juan Gnecco; Tianbing Ding; Dana R Glore; Virginia Pensabene; Kevin G Osteen
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 7.  An approach to classifying occupational exposures to endocrine disrupting chemicals by sex hormone function using an expert judgment process.

Authors:  R Prichystalova; E Caron-Beaudoin; L Richardson; E Dirkx; A Amadou; T Zavodna; R Cihak; V Cogliano; J Hynes; L Pelland-St-Pierre; M A Verner; M van Tongeren; V Ho
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 8.  Male fertility and skin diseases.

Authors:  M Badawy Abdel-Naser; Christos C Zouboulis
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 9.  Effects of endocrine disruptors on fetal testis development, male puberty, and transition age.

Authors:  Francesco Cargnelutti; Andrea Di Nisio; Francesco Pallotti; Iva Sabovic; Matteo Spaziani; Maria Grazia Tarsitano; Donatella Paoli; Carlo Foresta
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.633

10.  Analysis of Estrogenic Activity in Maryland Coastal Bays Using the MCF-7 Cell Proliferation Assay.

Authors:  Rehab Elfadul; Roman Jesien; Ahmed Elnabawi; Paulinus Chigbu; Ali Ishaque
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.