Literature DB >> 26847075

Incidence and predictors of clinically relevant cardiac perforation associated with systematic implantation of active-fixation pacing and defibrillation leads: a single-centre experience with over 3800 implanted leads.

Óscar Cano1, Ana Andrés2,3, Pau Alonso2,3, Joaquín Osca2, María-José Sancho-Tello2, José Olagüe2, Luis Martínez-Dolz2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Active-fixation leads have been associated with higher incidence of cardiac perforation. Large series specifically evaluating this complication are lacking. We sought to evaluate the incidence and predictors of clinically relevant cardiac perforation in a consecutive series of patients implanted with active-fixation pacing and defibrillation leads. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective observational study including all consecutive patients implanted with an active-fixation pacing/defibrillation lead at our institution from July 2008 to July 2015. The incidence of clinically relevant cardiac perforation and cardiac tamponade was evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictors of cardiac perforation. Acute and long-term management of these patients was also investigated. A total of 3822 active-fixation pacing (n = 3035) and defibrillation (n = 787) leads were implanted in 2200 patients. Seventeen patients (0.8%) had clinically relevant cardiac perforation (13 acute and 4 subacute perforations), and 13 (0.5%) had cardiac tamponade resolved with pericardiocentesis. None of the patients with cardiac perforation required surgical treatment. In multivariate analysis, an age >80 years (OR 3.84, 95% CI 1.14-12.87, P = 0.029), female sex (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.07-9.22, P = 0.037), and an apical position of the right ventricular lead (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.17-9.67, P = 0.024) were independent predictors of cardiac perforation.
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of active-fixation leads is associated with a low incidence of clinically relevant cardiac perforation. Older and female patients have a higher risk of perforation as well as those patients receiving the ventricular lead in an apical position. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2016. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active-fixation leads; Cardiac perforation; Cardiac tamponade; Implantable cardioverter defibrillator; Pacemaker

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26847075     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  18 in total

1.  Unexpected early complication of implantable-cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdelhafez; Nancy Wassef; Kai Hogrefe; Mohsin Farooq
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-06-06

2.  Pleural Effusion Secondary to Atrial Perforation During COVID-19 Period.

Authors:  Eduardo Laviña Soriano; Yunelsy Anta Mejías; Lucía Gil Abadía; Olga Mediano
Journal:  Arch Bronconeumol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Classical fluoroscopy criteria poorly predict right ventricular lead septal positioning by comparison with echocardiography.

Authors:  Fabien Squara; Didier Scarlatti; Philippe Riccini; Gauthier Garret; Pamela Moceri; Emile Ferrari
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Aortic root widening: "pro et contra".

Authors:  Balaji Srimurugan; Neethu Krishna; Rajesh Jose; Kirun Gopal; Praveen Kerala Varma
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-02-22

Review 5.  Complications in Device Therapy: Spectrum, Prevalence, and Management.

Authors:  J Llewellyn; D Garner; A Rao
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2022-08-06

6.  Repositioning a Displaced Right Ventricular Pacing Lead via Percutaneous Approach in Three Patients.

Authors:  Ahmad Yaminisharif; Seyed Hossein Ahmadi Tafti; Ali Hosseinsabet; Akbar Shafiee
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 7.  State-of-the-art narrative review: multimodality imaging in electrophysiology and cardiac device therapies.

Authors:  Balint Laczay; Divyang Patel; Richard Grimm; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

8.  Missed diagnosis: Dual right ventricular lead perforation resulting in chest pain.

Authors:  Daniel W Nelson; Caroline Vloka; Jule Wetherbee
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2016-10-03

9.  Delayed pacemaker lead perforations: Why unusual presentations should prompt an early multidisciplinary team approach.

Authors:  John An Kuang Chao; Michael S Firstenberg
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

10.  Subacute right ventricular pacemaker lead perforation: evaluation by echocardiography and cardiac CT.

Authors:  Reinier P J Boxma; Monique G M Kolff-Kamphuis; Ronald M M Gevers; Mohamed Boulaksil
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2017-05-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.